OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether overall survival is improving among women in the United States with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated trends in treatment and overall survival for women older than 65 years diagnosed with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 1995 and 2008 using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data. Parametric and semiparametric multivariate survival analyses were used to assess comparative treatment survival rates and factors affecting survival and recurrence. RESULTS: Of 7,938 women who met study criteria, 2.9% received no treatment, 15.4% underwent surgery only, 24.8% received chemotherapy only, 41.8% underwent primary debulking surgery and chemotherapy in an optimal timeframe, and 15.1% had primary debulking surgery and chemotherapy, but the timing was not optimal or patients did not complete all six cycles of chemotherapy. Those who underwent surgery only had similar survival as those who received no treatment (2.2 compared with 1.7 months), whereas those who received chemotherapy only had a better overall survival (14.4 months). Optimal treatment was associated with the longest survival time (P<.001, median overall survival 39.0 months). Additionally, survival time associated with optimal treatment increased over the past decade. However, the proportion of women who received optimal treatment has decreased over the past decade. CONCLUSION: Elderly women with advanced ovarian cancer have the best survival with optimal therapy. When this is not offered or possible, chemotherapy alone offers better survival than surgery alone.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether overall survival is improving among women in the United States with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated trends in treatment and overall survival for women older than 65 years diagnosed with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 1995 and 2008 using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data. Parametric and semiparametric multivariate survival analyses were used to assess comparative treatment survival rates and factors affecting survival and recurrence. RESULTS: Of 7,938 women who met study criteria, 2.9% received no treatment, 15.4% underwent surgery only, 24.8% received chemotherapy only, 41.8% underwent primary debulking surgery and chemotherapy in an optimal timeframe, and 15.1% had primary debulking surgery and chemotherapy, but the timing was not optimal or patients did not complete all six cycles of chemotherapy. Those who underwent surgery only had similar survival as those who received no treatment (2.2 compared with 1.7 months), whereas those who received chemotherapy only had a better overall survival (14.4 months). Optimal treatment was associated with the longest survival time (P<.001, median overall survival 39.0 months). Additionally, survival time associated with optimal treatment increased over the past decade. However, the proportion of women who received optimal treatment has decreased over the past decade. CONCLUSION: Elderly women with advanced ovarian cancer have the best survival with optimal therapy. When this is not offered or possible, chemotherapy alone offers better survival than surgery alone.
Authors: Sonali Patankar; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Yongmei Huang; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: M E van der Burg; M van Lent; M Buyse; A Kobierska; N Colombo; G Favalli; A J Lacave; M Nardi; J Renard; S Pecorelli Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1995-03-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Barbara A Goff; Barbara J Matthews; Michelle Wynn; Howard G Muntz; Denise M Lishner; Laura-Mae Baldwin Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2006-09-26 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Dennis S Chi; Oliver Zivanovic; Kimberly L Levinson; Valentin Kolev; Jae Huh; Joseph Dottino; Ginger J Gardner; Mario M Leitao; Douglas A Levine; Yukio Sonoda; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Carol L Brown; Richard R Barakat Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Michael A Bookman; Mark F Brady; William P McGuire; Peter G Harper; David S Alberts; Michael Friedlander; Nicoletta Colombo; Jeffrey M Fowler; Peter A Argenta; Koen De Geest; David G Mutch; Robert A Burger; Ann Marie Swart; Edward L Trimble; Chrisann Accario-Winslow; Lawrence M Roth Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Giovanni D Aletti; Antonio Santillan; Eric L Eisenhauer; Jae Hu; Giacomo Aletti; Karl C Podratz; Robert E Bristow; Dennis S Chi; William A Cliby Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2007-06-28 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Vivian E von Gruenigen; Helen Q Huang; Jan H Beumer; Heather A Lankes; William Tew; Thomas Herzog; Arti Hurria; Robert S Mannel; Tina Rizack; Lisa M Landrum; Peter G Rose; Ritu Salani; William H Bradley; Thomas J Rutherford; Robert V Higgins; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Gini Fleming Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Joan L Warren; Linda C Harlan; Edward L Trimble; Jennifer Stevens; Melvin Grimes; Kathleen A Cronin Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Alexander Melamed; Alexi Wright; Allison Gockley; Joel T Clemmer; John O Schorge; Marcela G Del Carmen; Nancy L Keating Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Kristin Weeks; Charles F Lynch; Michele West; Ryan Carnahan; Michael O'Rorke; Jacob Oleson; Megan McDonald; Sherri L Stewart; Mary Charlton Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 5.482