Robert E Bristow1, Jenny Chang2, Argyrios Ziogas2, Leslie M Randall3, Hoda Anton-Culver2. 1. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine-Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA. Electronic address: rbristow@uci.edu. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. 3. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine-Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the impact of hospital and physician ovarian cancer case volume on survival for advanced-stage disease and investigate socio-demographic variables associated with access to high-volume providers. METHODS: Consecutive patients with stage IIIC/IV epithelial ovarian cancer (1/1/96-12/31/06) were identified from the California Cancer Registry. Disease-specific survival analysis was performed using Cox-proportional hazards model. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate for differences in access to high-volume hospitals (HVH) (≥20 cases/year), high-volume physicians (HVP) (≥10 cases/year), and cross-tabulations of high- or low-volume hospital (LVH) and physician (LVP) according to socio-demographic variables. RESULTS: A total of 11,865 patients were identified. The median ovarian cancer-specific survival for all patients was 28.2 months, and on multivariate analysis the HVH/HVP provider combination (HR = 1.00) was associated with superior ovarian cancer-specific survival compared to LVH/LVP (HR = 1.31, 95%CI = 1.16-1.49). Overall, 2119 patients (17.9%) were cared for at HVHs, and 1791 patients (15.1%) were treated by HVPs. Only 4.3% of patients received care from HVH/HVP, while 53.1% of patients were treated by LVH/LVP. Both race and socio-demographic characteristics were independently associated with an increased likelihood of being cared for by the LVH/LVP combination and included: Hispanic race (OR = 1.72, 95%CI = 1.22-2.42), Asian/Pacific Islander race (OR = 1.57, 95%CI = 1.07-2.32), Medicaid insurance (OR = 2.51, 95%CI = 1.46-4.30), and low socioeconomic status (OR = 2.84, 95%CI = 1.90-4.23). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer, the provider combination of HVH/HVP is an independent predictor of improved disease-specific survival. Access to high-volume ovarian cancer providers is limited, and barriers are more pronounced for patients with low socioeconomic status, Medicaid insurance, and racial minorities.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the impact of hospital and physician ovarian cancer case volume on survival for advanced-stage disease and investigate socio-demographic variables associated with access to high-volume providers. METHODS: Consecutive patients with stage IIIC/IV epithelial ovarian cancer (1/1/96-12/31/06) were identified from the California Cancer Registry. Disease-specific survival analysis was performed using Cox-proportional hazards model. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate for differences in access to high-volume hospitals (HVH) (≥20 cases/year), high-volume physicians (HVP) (≥10 cases/year), and cross-tabulations of high- or low-volume hospital (LVH) and physician (LVP) according to socio-demographic variables. RESULTS: A total of 11,865 patients were identified. The median ovarian cancer-specific survival for all patients was 28.2 months, and on multivariate analysis the HVH/HVP provider combination (HR = 1.00) was associated with superior ovarian cancer-specific survival compared to LVH/LVP (HR = 1.31, 95%CI = 1.16-1.49). Overall, 2119 patients (17.9%) were cared for at HVHs, and 1791 patients (15.1%) were treated by HVPs. Only 4.3% of patients received care from HVH/HVP, while 53.1% of patients were treated by LVH/LVP. Both race and socio-demographic characteristics were independently associated with an increased likelihood of being cared for by the LVH/LVP combination and included: Hispanic race (OR = 1.72, 95%CI = 1.22-2.42), Asian/Pacific Islander race (OR = 1.57, 95%CI = 1.07-2.32), Medicaid insurance (OR = 2.51, 95%CI = 1.46-4.30), and low socioeconomic status (OR = 2.84, 95%CI = 1.90-4.23). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer, the provider combination of HVH/HVP is an independent predictor of improved disease-specific survival. Access to high-volume ovarian cancer providers is limited, and barriers are more pronounced for patients with low socioeconomic status, Medicaid insurance, and racial minorities.
Authors: Jason D Wright; Yongmei Huang; Alexander Melamed; Ana I Tergas; Caryn M St Clair; June Y Hou; Fady Khoury-Collado; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Robert E Bristow; Jenny Chang; Argyrios Ziogas; Daniel L Gillen; Lu Bai; Veronica M Vieira Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-01-31 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Robert E Bristow; Jenny Chang; Argyrios Ziogas; Belinda Campos; Leo R Chavez; Hoda Anton-Culver Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-02-14 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Renee A Cowan; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Ginger J Gardner; Douglas A Levine; Kara Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Oliver Zivanovic; William P Tew; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman; Hebert A Vargas Alvarez; Debra M Sarasohn; Svetlana Mironov; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Dennis S Chi Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Larissa A Meyer; Angel M Cronin; Charlotte C Sun; Kristin Bixel; Michael A Bookman; Mihaela C Cristea; Jennifer J Griggs; Charles F Levenback; Robert A Burger; Gina Mantia-Smaldone; Ursula A Matulonis; Joyce C Niland; David M O'Malley; Alexi A Wright Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joseph A Dottino; Weiguo He; Charlotte C Sun; Hui Zhao; Shuangshuang Fu; Karen H Lu; Larissa A Meyer Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 5.482