Literature DB >> 20609464

The incidence of major complications after the performance of extensive upper abdominal surgical procedures during primary cytoreduction of advanced ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinomas.

Dennis S Chi1, Oliver Zivanovic, Kimberly L Levinson, Valentin Kolev, Jae Huh, Joseph Dottino, Ginger J Gardner, Mario M Leitao, Douglas A Levine, Yukio Sonoda, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum, Carol L Brown, Richard R Barakat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the morbidity and mortality associated with extensive upper abdominal surgery (EUAS) performed during primary cytoreduction for advanced ovarian carcinoma.
METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent EUAS during primary cytoreduction for advanced ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer at our institution from 1/01 to 12/06. Major grade 3-5 complications were those that led to invasive radiologic intervention, re-operation, unplanned ICU admission, chronic disability, or death within 30 days of surgery.
RESULTS: There were 141 eligible patients, with a median age of 60 years (range, 38-82). The majority of patients had stage IIIC disease, 103 (73%); serous histology, 131 (93%); and ascites, 118 (84%). There were 229 EUAS procedures performed-diaphragm peritonectomy, 101 (72%); splenectomy, 45 (32%); full-thickness diaphragm resection, 19 (14%); partial hepatectomy, 18 (13%); distal pancreatectomy, 17 (12%); cholecystectomy, 15 (11%); and resection of porta hepatis tumor, 14 (10%). Cytoreductive outcomes were: no gross residual, 42 (30%); residual ≤ 1cm, 85 (60%); and residual >1cm, 14 (10%). Grade 3-5 complications occurred in 31 (22%) patients, including 2 mortalities (1.4%). In 21/31 (68%), the complication was successfully managed with percutaneous drainage of infected or non-infected collections. Overall median survival for all patients was 57 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Rates of major morbidity and mortality following EUAS for primary cytoreduction were 22% and 1.4%, respectively. Approximately two-thirds of complications were readily managed by percutaneous drainage of collections. With an overall median survival of 57 months in a cohort of patients with a large tumor burden, this rate of morbidity and mortality appears acceptable.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20609464     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.05.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  47 in total

1.  Does aggressive surgery improve outcomes? Interaction between preoperative disease burden and complex surgery in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer: an analysis of GOG 182.

Authors:  Neil S Horowitz; Austin Miller; Bunja Rungruang; Scott D Richard; Noah Rodriguez; Michael A Bookman; Chad A Hamilton; Thomas C Krivak; G Larry Maxwell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Predictive value of the Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index on perioperative complications and survival in patients undergoing primary debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Rudy S Suidan; Mario M Leitao; Oliver Zivanovic; Ginger J Gardner; Kara C Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Douglas A Levine; Elizabeth L Jewell; Carol L Brown; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mary E Charlson; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  A Comparison of Thermal Plasma Energy Versus Argon Beam Coagulator-Induced Intestinal Injury After Vaporization in a Porcine Model.

Authors:  Edward J Tanner; Erica Dun; Yukio Sonoda; Alexander B Olawaiye; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Impact of distal pancreatectomy on outcomes of peritoneal surface disease treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Authors:  Andrea N Doud; Reese W Randle; Clancy J Clark; Edward A Levine; Katrina R Swett; Perry Shen; John H Stewart; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Laparoscopic Surgical Algorithm to Triage the Timing of Tumor Reductive Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Nicole D Fleming; Alpa M Nick; Robert L Coleman; Shannon N Westin; Pedro T Ramirez; Pamela T Soliman; Bryan Fellman; Larissa A Meyer; Kathleen M Schmeler; Karen H Lu; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Lymphocele and ovarian cancer: risk factors and impact on survival.

Authors:  Tristan Gauthier; Catherine Uzan; Delphine Lefeuvre; Aminata Kane; Geoffroy Canlorbe; Fredéric Deschamps; Catherine Lhomme; Patricia Pautier; Philippe Morice; Sébastien Gouy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-06-15

Review 7.  Radical surgery in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Deepa Maheswari Narasimhulu; Fady Khoury-Collado; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  National trends in bowel and upper abdominal procedures in ovarian cancer surgery.

Authors:  Joseph A Dottino; Weiguo He; Charlotte C Sun; Hui Zhao; Shuangshuang Fu; Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Rudy S Suidan; Karen H Lu; Sharon H Giordano; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.437

9.  Ovarian Cancer Treatment and Survival Trends Among Women Older Than 65 Years of Age in the United States, 1995-2008.

Authors:  Jenny J Lin; Natalia Egorova; Rebeca Franco; Monica Prasad-Hayes; Nina A Bickell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Feasibility, safety and clinical outcomes of cardiophrenic lymph node resection in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Renee A Cowan; Jill Tseng; Vijayashree Murthy; Radhika Srivastava; Kara C Long Roche; Oliver Zivanovic; Ginger J Gardner; Dennis S Chi; Bernard J Park; Yukio Sonoda
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.