Literature DB >> 7792248

Salmonella contamination in commercial eggs and an egg production facility.

F T Jones1, D V Rives, J B Carey.   

Abstract

Egg samples were collected from various stages of an egg processing operation and from the attached production facility. Salmonella was isolated from 72.0% of all samples collected from the laying house environment. Recovery of Salmonella from flush water, ventilation fan, egg belt, and egg collector samples were (positive samples/total samples collected): 2/2, 4/4, 16/22, and 14/22, respectively. Salmonella was found on 7 of the 90 eggshells sampled before processing and 1 of 90 eggshells sampled after processing, but Salmonella was not found in the 180 eggs analyzed for internal contamination following processing. The one eggshell found positive for Salmonella following processing was detected when the pH of wash water samples was lowest (10.19). The 60 isolates from production facilities included the following Salmonella serotypes: S. agona, S. typhimurium, S. infantis, S. derby, S. heidelberg, S. california, S. montevideo, S. mbandaka, and untypable. The 22 isolates obtained from eggshells prior to processing were serotyped as S. heidelberg and S. montevideo. All five isolates obtained from eggshells after processing were serotyped as S. heidelberg. These data suggest that although the shells of about 1% of commercial eggs are contaminated with Salmonella, contamination of the internal contents of eggs with Salmonella is a rare event.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7792248     DOI: 10.3382/ps.0740753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

1.  Application of rapid dot blot immunoassay for detection of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis in eggs, poultry, and other foods.

Authors:  M A Yoshimasu; J Zawistowski
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effect of a direct-fed microbial (10-G Armor) on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and prevalence of Salmonella in fed-beef heifers.

Authors:  Lauren M Mayer; Kevin Martens; Alyssa B Word; Ben P Holland; Loni L Lucherk; Ty E Lawrence; Travis C Tennant
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-26

Review 3.  Emergence, Dissemination and Antimicrobial Resistance of the Main Poultry-Associated Salmonella Serovars in Brazil.

Authors:  Diéssy Kipper; Andréa Karoline Mascitti; Silvia De Carli; Andressa Matos Carneiro; André Felipe Streck; André Salvador Kazantzi Fonseca; Nilo Ikuta; Vagner Ricardo Lunge
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-03

4.  Effect of Radiant Catalytic Ionization and Ozonation on Salmonella spp. on Eggshells.

Authors:  Katarzyna Grudlewska-Buda; Natalia Wiktorczyk-Kapischke; Ewa Wałecka-Zacharska; Joanna Kwiecińska-Piróg; Grzegorz Gryń; Karolina Jadwiga Skowron; Jakub Korkus; Eugenia Gospodarek-Komkowka; Jarosław Bystroń; Anna Budzyńska; Stefan Kruszewski; Zbigniew Paluszak; Małgorzata Andrzejewska; Monika Wilk; Krzysztof Skowron
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-08-14

5.  Detection of Salmonella spp in commercial eggs in Iran.

Authors:  Mir-Hassan Moosavy; Saber Esmaeili; Fahimeh Bagheri Amiri; Ehsan Mostafavi; Taghi Zahraei Salehi
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2015-02

6.  Commercially laid eggs vs. discarded hatching eggs: contamination by Salmonella spp.

Authors:  Luciana B M Kottwitz; Joice Aparecida Leão; Alberto Back; Dalia dos P Rodrigues; Marciane Magnani; Tereza C R M de Oliveira
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.476

Review 7.  Ceftiofur-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg of poultry origin - a risk profile using the Codex framework.

Authors:  Carolee Carson; Xian-Zhi Li; Agnes Agunos; Daleen Loest; Brennan Chapman; Rita Finley; Manisha Mehrotra; Lauren M Sherk; Réjean Gaumond; Rebecca Irwin
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.451

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.