Edwin van Dellen1, Marc M Bohlken2, Laurijn Draaisma2, Prejaas K Tewarie3, Remko van Lutterveld4, René Mandl2, Cornelis J Stam5, Iris E Sommer2. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Utrecht, The Netherlands; E.vanDellen@umcutrecht.nl. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 3. Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 4. Center for Mindfulness, University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Shrewsbury, MA; 5. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Individuals with subclinical psychotic symptoms provide a unique window on the pathophysiology of psychotic experiences as these individuals are free of confounders such as hospitalization, negative and cognitive symptoms and medication use. Brain network disturbances of white matter connections are thought to play a central role in the pathophysiology of psychosis. Based on the structural network disconnection hypothesis in schizophrenia, we expect less and weaker connections, and altered brain network organization in individuals with clinical and those with subclinical psychotic symptoms. METHODS: We used diffusion tensor imaging to study 35 patients with a psychotic disorder, 35 subjects with subclinical psychotic symptoms, and 36 healthy controls. The structural brain network was analyzed on 3 levels: connection density, white matter microstructure (fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and magnetic transfer ratio), and network organization. Network organization was studied with minimum spanning tree analysis, a method to reconstruct a backbone of structural highways in the brain. RESULTS: Decreased fractional anisotropy and increased mean diffusivity was found in both groups with psychotic symptoms, while their network topology showed decreased overlap with a healthy reference network. Decreased centrality was found in several brain regions, including parietal hubs and language areas, in both groups with psychotic symptoms. Deviation of network characteristics was more apparent in clinical subjects than in subclinical subjects. DISCUSSION: Weaker connections and decreased centrality of parietal hubs characterize the structural brain network in subjects with psychotic symptoms. These differences are more notable in clinical than in subclinical subjects with psychotic experiences.
BACKGROUND: Individuals with subclinical psychotic symptoms provide a unique window on the pathophysiology of psychotic experiences as these individuals are free of confounders such as hospitalization, negative and cognitive symptoms and medication use. Brain network disturbances of white matter connections are thought to play a central role in the pathophysiology of psychosis. Based on the structural network disconnection hypothesis in schizophrenia, we expect less and weaker connections, and altered brain network organization in individuals with clinical and those with subclinical psychotic symptoms. METHODS: We used diffusion tensor imaging to study 35 patients with a psychotic disorder, 35 subjects with subclinical psychotic symptoms, and 36 healthy controls. The structural brain network was analyzed on 3 levels: connection density, white matter microstructure (fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and magnetic transfer ratio), and network organization. Network organization was studied with minimum spanning tree analysis, a method to reconstruct a backbone of structural highways in the brain. RESULTS: Decreased fractional anisotropy and increased mean diffusivity was found in both groups with psychotic symptoms, while their network topology showed decreased overlap with a healthy reference network. Decreased centrality was found in several brain regions, including parietal hubs and language areas, in both groups with psychotic symptoms. Deviation of network characteristics was more apparent in clinical subjects than in subclinical subjects. DISCUSSION: Weaker connections and decreased centrality of parietal hubs characterize the structural brain network in subjects with psychotic symptoms. These differences are more notable in clinical than in subclinical subjects with psychotic experiences.
Authors: Bruce Fischl; André van der Kouwe; Christophe Destrieux; Eric Halgren; Florent Ségonne; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Larry J Seidman; Jill Goldstein; David Kennedy; Verne Caviness; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Rahul S Desikan; Florent Ségonne; Bruce Fischl; Brian T Quinn; Bradford C Dickerson; Deborah Blacker; Randy L Buckner; Anders M Dale; R Paul Maguire; Bradley T Hyman; Marilyn S Albert; Ronald J Killiany Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-03-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: M Kubicki; H Park; C F Westin; P G Nestor; R V Mulkern; S E Maier; M Niznikiewicz; E E Connor; J J Levitt; M Frumin; R Kikinis; F A Jolesz; R W McCarley; M E Shenton Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-07-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Edwin van Dellen; Iris E Sommer; Marc M Bohlken; Prejaas Tewarie; Laurijn Draaisma; Andrew Zalesky; Maria Di Biase; Jesse A Brown; Linda Douw; Willem M Otte; René C W Mandl; Cornelis J Stam Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Maya J L Schutte; Marc M Bohlken; Guusje Collin; Lucija Abramovic; Marco P M Boks; Wiepke Cahn; Meenakshi Dauwan; Edwin van Dellen; Neeltje E M van Haren; Kenneth Hugdahl; Sanne Koops; René C W Mandl; Iris E C Sommer Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: S J T van Montfort; A J C Slooter; I M J Kant; R R van der Leur; C Spies; J de Bresser; T D Witkamp; J Hendrikse; E van Dellen Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 4.881