Literature DB >> 24567348

Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.

Heidi J B Witteveen1, Hans S Rietman2, Peter H Veltink3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: User feedback about grasping force and hand aperture is very important in object handling with myoelectric forearm prostheses but is lacking in current prostheses. Vibrotactile feedback increases the performance of healthy subjects in virtual grasping tasks, but no extensive validation on potential users has been performed.
OBJECTIVES: Investigate the performance of upper-limb loss subjects in grasping tasks with vibrotactile stimulation, providing hand aperture, and grasping force feedback. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-over trial.
METHODS: A total of 10 subjects with upper-limb loss performed virtual grasping tasks while perceiving vibrotactile feedback. Hand aperture feedback was provided through an array of coin motors and grasping force feedback through a single miniature stimulator or an array of coin motors. Objects with varying sizes and weights had to be grasped by a virtual hand.
RESULTS: Percentages correctly applied hand apertures and correct grasping force levels were all higher for the vibrotactile feedback condition compared to the no-feedback condition. With visual feedback, the results were always better compared to the vibrotactile feedback condition. Task durations were comparable for all feedback conditions.
CONCLUSION: Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback improves grasping performance of subjects with upper-limb loss. However, it should be investigated whether this is of additional value in daily-life tasks. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study is a first step toward the implementation of sensory vibrotactile feedback for users of myoelectric forearm prostheses. Grasping force feedback is crucial for optimal object handling, and hand aperture feedback is essential for reduction of required visual attention. Grasping performance with feedback is evaluated for the potential users. © The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics 2014.

Keywords:  Upper-limb prosthetics; grasping force feedback; hand aperture feedback; vibrotactile stimulation; virtual grasping tasks

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24567348     DOI: 10.1177/0309364614522260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int        ISSN: 0309-3646            Impact factor:   1.895


  21 in total

1.  Sensory feedback by peripheral nerve stimulation improves task performance in individuals with upper limb loss using a myoelectric prosthesis.

Authors:  Matthew Schiefer; Daniel Tan; Steven M Sidek; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Effect of Dual Tasking on Vibrotactile Feedback Guided Reaching - a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Valay A Shah; Nicoletta Risi; Giulia Ballardini; Leigh A Mrotek; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Haptics (2018)       Date:  2018-06-05

3.  Alpha-band activity in parietofrontal cortex predicts future availability of vibrotactile feedback in prosthesis use.

Authors:  John T Johnson; Daniele de Mari; Harper Doherty; Frank L Hammond; Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Closed-loop control of a prosthetic finger via evoked proprioceptive information.

Authors:  Luis Vargas; He Helen Huang; Yong Zhu; Xiaogang Hu
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Object Recognition via Evoked Sensory Feedback during Control of a Prosthetic Hand.

Authors:  Luis Vargas; He Huang; Yong Zhu; Xiaogang Hu
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2021-10-27

6.  Static and dynamic proprioceptive recognition through vibrotactile stimulation.

Authors:  Luis Vargas; He Helen Huang; Yong Zhu; Xiaogang Hu
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 7.  Toward higher-performance bionic limbs for wider clinical use.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Ivan Vujaklija; Rickard Brånemark; Anthony M J Bull; Hans Dietl; Bernhard Graimann; Levi J Hargrove; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann; He Helen Huang; Thorvaldur Ingvarsson; Hilmar Bragi Janusson; Kristleifur Kristjánsson; Todd Kuiken; Silvestro Micera; Thomas Stieglitz; Agnes Sturma; Dustin Tyler; Richard F Ff Weir; Oskar C Aszmann
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 25.671

8.  Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics.

Authors:  Laura H B Huinink; Hanneke Bouwsema; Dick H Plettenburg; Corry K van der Sluis; Raoul M Bongers
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  High Cable Forces Deteriorate Pinch Force Control in Voluntary-Closing Body-Powered Prostheses.

Authors:  Mona Hichert; David A Abbink; Peter J Kyberd; Dick H Plettenburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Supplemental vibrotactile feedback control of stabilization and reaching actions of the arm using limb state and position error encodings.

Authors:  Alexis R Krueger; Psiche Giannoni; Valay Shah; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.