Literature DB >> 26643010

Electromagnetic Contact-Force Sensing Electrophysiological Catheters: How Accurate is the Technology?

Felix Bourier1, Gabriele Hessling1, Sonia Ammar-Busch1, Marc Kottmaier1, Alessandra Buiatti1, Christian Grebmer1, Marta Telishevska1, Verena Semmler1, Carsten Lennerz1, Christine Schneider1, Christof Kolb1, Isabel Deisenhofer1, Tilko Reents1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contact-force (CF) sensing catheters are increasingly used in clinical electrophysiological practice due to their efficacy and safety profile. As data about the accuracy of this technology are scarce, we sought to quantify accuracy based on in vitro experiments. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A custom-made force sensor was constructed that allowed exact force reference measurements registered via a flexible membrane. A Smarttouch Surround Flow (ST SF) ablation catheter (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) was brought in contact with the membrane of the force sensor in order to compare the ST SF force measurements to force sensor reference measurements. ST SF force sensing technology is based on deflection registration between the distal and proximal catheter tip. The experiment was repeated for n = 10 ST SF catheters, which showed no significant difference in accuracy levels. A series of measurements (n = 1200) was carried out for different angles of force acting to the catheter tip (0°/perpendicular contact, 30°, 60°, 90°/parallel contact). The mean absolute differences between reference and ST SF measurements were 1.7 ± 1.8 g (0°), 1.6 ± 1.2 g (30°), 1.4 ± 1.3 g (60°), and 6.6 ± 5.9 g (90°). Measurement accuracy was significantly higher in non-parallel contact when compared with parallel contact (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Catheter force measurements using the ST SF catheters show a high level of accuracy regarding differences to reference measurements and reproducibility. The reduced accuracy in measurements of 90° acting forces (parallel contact) might be clinically important when creating, for example, linear lesions.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  3D mapping systems; Smarttouch Surround Flow catheter; catheter ablation; contact force

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26643010     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  5 in total

Review 1.  3D Mapping for PVI- Geometry, Image Integration and Incorporation of Contact Force Into Work Flow.

Authors:  Martin Borlich; Leon Iden; Krister Kuhnhardt; Ingo Paetsch; Gerhard Hindricks; Philipp Sommer
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-04-30

2.  Increasing the Single-Procedure Success Rate of Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Authors:  Mattias Duytschaever; Mark O'Neill; Martin Martinek
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2017-12

Review 3.  Catheter Ablation to Treat Supraventricular Arrhythmia in Children and Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: What We Know and Where We Are Going.

Authors:  Patricia E Thomas; Scott L Macicek
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2016

4.  Contact force-sensing catheters: performance in an ex vivo porcine heart model.

Authors:  Eduardo Franco; Daniel Rodríguez Muñoz; Roberto Matía; Antonio Hernández-Madrid; Inmaculada Sánchez Pérez; José Luis Zamorano; Javier Moreno
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Prospective Evaluation of Lesion Index-Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation Technique in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: 1-year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Luca De Mattia; Martino Crosato; Stefano Indiani; Elena Causin; Claudia Licciardello; Paolo Antonio Maria Squasi; Alessandro De Leo; Vittorio Calzolari
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-04-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.