| Literature DB >> 26640795 |
Rui Liu1, Cheng Han1, Di Wu1, Xinghai Xia1, Jianqiu Gu1, Haixia Guan1, Zhongyan Shan1, Weiping Teng1.
Abstract
We systematically identified the prevalence of hyperuricemia and gout in mainland China and provided informative data that can be used to create appropriate local public health policies. Relevant articles from 2000 to 2014 were identified by searching 5 electronic databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Chinese Wanfang, CNKI, and Chongqing VIP. All of the calculations were performed using the Stata 11.0 and SPSS 20.0 software. The eligible articles (n = 36; 3 in English and 33 in Chinese) included 44 studies (38 regarding hyperuricemia and 6 regarding gout). The pooled prevalence of hyperuricemia and gout was 13.3% (95% CI: 11.9%, 14.6%) and 1.1% (95% CI: 0.7%, 1.5%), respectively. Although publication bias was observed, the results did not change after a trim and fill test, indicating that that impact of this bias was likely insignificant. The prevalence of hyperuricemia and gout was high in mainland China. The subgroup analysis suggested that the geographical region, whether the residents dwell in urban or rural and coastal or inland areas, the economic level, and sex may be associated with prevalence.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26640795 PMCID: PMC4657091 DOI: 10.1155/2015/762820
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Characteristics of studies on the prevalence of hyperuricemia and gout.
| First author | Publication year | Area | Diagnostic criterion ( | Rural/urban | Inland/coastal | Study year | Sample size | Case | Prevalence (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of hyperuricemia | |||||||||
| Shi [ | 2013 | Shijingshan, Beijing | ≥420/≥350 | Urban | Inland | 2012 | 3961 | 438 | 11.06 |
| Ma [ | 2014 | Xichengqu, Beijing | ≥417/≥357 | Urban | Inland | 2012 | 834 | 100 | 11.99 |
| Li [ | 2013 | Bortala, Xinjiang | >420/>350 | Rural | Inland | 2009 | 2046 | 261 | 12.76 |
| Zheng [ | 2010 | Wenzhou, Zhejiang | ≥417/≥357 | Urban | Inland | 2008 | 1520 | 114 | 7.50 |
| Sun [ | 2008 | Dalian, Liaoning | ≥420/≥350 | Rural | Coastal | 2007 | 1024 | 100 | 9.77 |
| Hou [ | 2010 | Dalian, Liaoning | >420/>350 | Rural | Coastal | 2007 | 1021 | 97 | 9.50 |
| Wang [ | 2010 | Baoshan, Yunnan | >420/>350 | Urban | Coastal | 2009 | 1501 | 210 | 13.99 |
| Yu [ | 2010 | Foshan, Guangdong | ≥417/≥357 | Urban | Coastal | 2008 | 7403 | 1117 | 15.09 |
| Wu [ | 2008 | Guangzhou, Guangdong | ≥417/≥357 | Urban | Inland | 2007 | 2788 | 578 | 20.73 |
| Zou [ | 2011 | Guilin, Guangxi | ≥420/≥360 | Urban | Inland | 2009 | 6273 | 1477 | 23.55 |
| Wang [ | 2008 | Zhoushan, Zhejiang | >420/>360 | Rural | Inland | 2007 | 1438 | 158 | 10.99 |
| Meng [ | 2012 | Gaoyou, Jiangsu | ≥420/≥360 | Rural | Inland | 2010 | 4504 | 538 | 11.94 |
| Shen [ | 2014 | Wuxi, Jiangsu | ≥417/≥357 | Urban | Inland | 2009 | 3723 | 754 | 20.25 |
| Song [ | 2014 | Nanchang, Jiangxi | >420/>350 | Urban | Inland | 2011 | 3795 | 795 | 20.95 |
| Shao [ | 2003 | Nanjing, Jiangsu | ≥417/≥357 | Urban | Inland | 2003 | 7778 | 1038 | 13.35 |
| Zhou [ | 2013 | Ningbo, Zhejiang | >420/>370 | Urban | Coastal | 2008 | 2110 | 190 | 9.00 |
| Huang [ | 2013 | Ningbo, Zhejiang | >420/>360 | Urban | Coastal | 2012 | 1754 | 195 | 11.12 |
| Xin [ | 2013 | Qingdao, Shandong | >420/>350 | Urban | Coastal | 2011 | 5165 | 748 | 14.48 |
| Tian [ | 2008 | Qingdao, Shandong | >420/>350 | Urban | Coastal | 2006 | 2363 | 471 | 19.93 |
| Tian [ | 2008 | Qingdao, Shandong | >420/>350 | Rural | Coastal | 2006 | 2467 | 405 | 16.42 |
| Dong [ | 2004 | Qingdao, Shandong | >420/>350 | Urban | Coastal | 2002 | 2190 | 402 | 18.36 |
| Zhang [ | 2006 | Haiyang, Shandong | >416.36/>356.88 | Rural | Coastal | 2004 | 5372 | 649 | 12.08 |
| Wang [ | 2010 | Shenyang, Liaoning | >420/>350 | Urban | Inland | 2009 | 675 | 78 | 11.56 |
| Chen [ | 2008 | Chengdu, Sichuan | ≥428 | Urban | Inland | 2006 | 2566 | 400 | 15.59 |
| Guo [ | 2012 | Taiyuan, Shanxi | ≥420 | Urban | Inland | 2010 | 4228 | 371 | 8.77 |
| Wang [ | 2010 | Wenzhou, Zhejiang | >420/>350 | Urban | Coastal | 2008 | 3478 | 260 | 7.48 |
| Shao [ | 2011 | Wenzhou, Zhejiang | >420/>350 | Urban | Coastal | 2008 | 3480 | 260 | 7.47 |
| Pan [ | 2014 | Changzhou, Jiangsu | >420/>380 | Rural | Inland | 2008 | 3122 | 573 | 18.35 |
| Duan [ | 2013 | Korla, Xinjiang | >417/>357 | Urban | Inland | 2009 | 2046 | 261 | 12.76 |
| Zhang [ | 2014 | Xingtai, Hebei | >420/>350 | Rural | Inland | 2013 | 2109 | 177 | 8.39 |
| Mou [ | 2013 | Yantai, Shandong | ≥380 | Urban | Coastal | 2012 | 635 | 66 | 10.39 |
| Li [ | 2010 | Yan'an, Shaanxi | >417/>357 | Urban | Inland | 2008 | 1290 | 71 | 5.50 |
| Chen [ | 2009 | Dali, Yunnan | >420/>350 | Urban | Inland | 2006 | 7505 | 923 | 12.30 |
| Jin [ | 2009 | Zhuhai, Guangdong | >420/>360 | Rural | Coastal | 2007 | 1112 | 164 | 14.75 |
| Cai [ | 2009 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang | >420/>360 | Urban | Inland | 2008 | 4155 | 702 | 16.90 |
| You [ | 2014 | Mongolian | ≥416/≥357 | Urban | Inland | 2009 | 630 | 120 | 19.05 |
| You [ | 2014 | Mongolian | ≥416/≥357 | Rural | Coastal | 2009 | 179 | 23 | 12.85 |
| Zhang [ | 2011 | Tianjin | >420/>360 | Urban | Coastal | 2009 | 17762 | 2160 | 12.16 |
|
| |||||||||
| Prevalence of gout | |||||||||
| Yu [ | 2010 | Foshan, Guangdong | — | Urban | Coastal | 2008 | 7403 | 77 | 1.04 |
| Wu [ | 2008 | Guangzhou, Guangdong | — | Urban | Inland | 2007 | 2788 | 40 | 1.43 |
| Song [ | 2014 | Nanchang, Jiangxi | — | Urban | Inland | 2011 | 3795 | 58 | 1.53 |
| Shao [ | 2003 | Nanjing, Jiangsu | — | Urban | Inland | 2003 | 7778 | 105 | 1.35 |
| Zhang [ | 2006 | Haiyang, Shandong | — | Rural | Coastal | 2004 | 5372 | 23 | 0.43 |
| Zhang [ | 2014 | Xingtai, Hebei | — | Rural | Inland | 2013 | 2109 | 26 | 1.23 |
Gout classification criteria.
|
Yu et al. [ | Wu et al., Song et al., Shao et al., Zhang et al., and Zhang et al. [ |
|---|---|
| Classification criteria for gout [ | ARA preliminary classification criteria for acute gout 1977 [ |
Figure 1Flow diagram for the literature-search process.
Figure 2Forest plot of the pooled prevalence of hyperuricemia in mainland China.
Figure 3Forest plot of the pooled prevalence of gout in mainland China.
Figure 4Regional distribution of pooled prevalence of hyperuricemia in mainland China.
Figure 5Regional distribution of pooled prevalence of gout in mainland China.
Stratified prevalence of hyperuricemia in mainland China.
| Subgroups | Prevalence (%) (95% CI) | Number of studies | Heterogeneity | Case/total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Area | |||||
| Urban | 13.7 (12.0, 15.4) | 27 | 98.4 | <0.001 | 14322/101787 |
| Rural | 12.3 (10.5, 14.1) | 11 | 94.3 | <0.001 | 3154/24581 |
| Coastal/inland | |||||
| Inland | 13.8 (11.8, 15.7) | 23 | 98.3 | <0.001 | 10160/68666 |
| Coast | 12.5 (10.8, 14.2) | 15 | 97.3 | <0.001 | 7316/57702 |
| Location | |||||
| North China | 13.2 (11.5, 14.8) | 13 | 96.3 | <0.001 | 6162/48261 |
| East China | 12.9 (10.2, 15.6) | 12 | 98.6 | <0.001 | 5577/40857 |
| Northwest | 10.3 (5.4, 15.3) | 3 | 97.4 | <0.001 | 593/5382 |
| Northeast | 10.1 (8.9, 11.2) | 3 | 0.0 | 0.376 | 275/2720 |
| Southwest | 13.9 (11.7, 16.1) | 3 | 88.6 | <0.001 | 1533/11572 |
| South China | 18.6 (13.8, 23.3) | 4 | 98.3 | <0.006 | 3336/17576 |
| Economic level | |||||
| High | 13.8 (12.0, 15.6) | 20 | 98.0 | <0.001 | 8094/59811 |
| Low | 12.6 (10.6, 14.7) | 18 | 98.1 | <0.001 | 9382/66557 |
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 19.4 (17.6, 21.1) | 38 | 96.7 | <0.001 | 11644/60768 |
| Female | 7.9 (6.6, 9.3) | 38 | 97.9 | <0.001 | 5859/65654 |
| Total | 13.3 (11.9, 14.6) | 38 | 98.0 | <0.001 | 17476/126368 |
Prevalence of gout in mainland China by different stratification factors.
| Subgroups | Prevalence (%) (95% CI) | Number of studies | Heterogeneity | Case/total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Area | |||||
| Urban | 1.2 (0.7, 1.8) | 4 | 0.0 | 0.830 | 280/21764 |
| Rural | 0.9 (0.2, 1.6) | 2 | 14.0 | 0.313 | 49/7481 |
| Coastal/inland | |||||
| Inland | 1.4 (0.8, 1.9) | 4 | 0.0 | 0.989 | 229/16470 |
| Coastal | 0.8 (0.2, 1.4) | 2 | 0.4 | 0.316 | 100/12775 |
| Study year | |||||
| 2000–2005 | 0.9 (0.0, 1.8) | 2 | 59.1 | 0.118 | 128/13150 |
| 2006–2010 | 1.1 (0.4, 1.8) | 2 | 0.0 | 0.655 | 117/10191 |
| 2011–2014 | 1.4 (0.5, 2.2) | 2 | 0.0 | 0.737 | 84/5904 |
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 1.5 (0.8, 2.1) | 6 | 1.9 | 0.404 | 226/14060 |
| Female | 0.9 (0.0, 1) | 6 | 0.0 | 0.924 | 78/15185 |
| Total | 1.1 (0.7, 1.5) | 6 | 0.0 | 0.644 | 329/29245 |