OBJECTIVE: Previous small studies in Aotearoa New Zealand have indicated a high prevalence of gout. This study sought to determine the prevalence of gout in the entire Aotearoa New Zealand population using national-level health data sets. METHODS: We used hospitalization and drug dispensing claims for allopurinol and colchicine for the entire Aotearoa New Zealand population from the Aotearoa New Zealand Health Tracker (ANZHT) to estimate the prevalence of gout in 2009, stratified by age, gender, ethnicity and socio-economic status (n = 4 295 296). RESULTS: were compared with those obtained from an independent large primary care data set (HealthStat, n = 555 313). Results. The all-ages crude prevalence of diagnosed gout in the ANZHT population was 2.69%. A similar prevalence of 2.89% was observed in the HealthStat population standardized to the ANZHT population for age, gender, ethnicity and deprivation. Analysis of the ANZHT population showed that gout was more common in Māori and Pacific people [relative risk (RR) 3.11 and 3.59, respectively], in males (RR 3.58), in those living in the most socio-economically deprived areas (RR 1.41) and in those aged >65 years (RR >40) (P-value for all <0.0001). The prevalence of gout in elderly Māori and Pacific men was particularly high at >25%. CONCLUSION: Applying algorithms to national administrative data sets provides a readily available method for estimating the prevalence of a chronic condition such as gout, where diagnosis and drug treatment are relatively specific for this disease. We have demonstrated high gout prevalence in the entire Aotearoa New Zealand population, particularly among Māori and Pacific people.
OBJECTIVE: Previous small studies in Aotearoa New Zealand have indicated a high prevalence of gout. This study sought to determine the prevalence of gout in the entire Aotearoa New Zealand population using national-level health data sets. METHODS: We used hospitalization and drug dispensing claims for allopurinol and colchicine for the entire Aotearoa New Zealand population from the Aotearoa New Zealand Health Tracker (ANZHT) to estimate the prevalence of gout in 2009, stratified by age, gender, ethnicity and socio-economic status (n = 4 295 296). RESULTS: were compared with those obtained from an independent large primary care data set (HealthStat, n = 555 313). Results. The all-ages crude prevalence of diagnosed gout in the ANZHT population was 2.69%. A similar prevalence of 2.89% was observed in the HealthStat population standardized to the ANZHT population for age, gender, ethnicity and deprivation. Analysis of the ANZHT population showed that gout was more common in Māori and Pacific people [relative risk (RR) 3.11 and 3.59, respectively], in males (RR 3.58), in those living in the most socio-economically deprived areas (RR 1.41) and in those aged >65 years (RR >40) (P-value for all <0.0001). The prevalence of gout in elderly Māori and Pacific men was particularly high at >25%. CONCLUSION: Applying algorithms to national administrative data sets provides a readily available method for estimating the prevalence of a chronic condition such as gout, where diagnosis and drug treatment are relatively specific for this disease. We have demonstrated high gout prevalence in the entire Aotearoa New Zealand population, particularly among Māori and Pacific people.
Authors: Sharan K Rai; J Antonio Aviña-Zubieta; Natalie McCormick; Mary A De Vera; Kam Shojania; Eric C Sayre; Hyon K Choi Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: José M A Wijnands; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Kristof Thevissen; Ilja C W Arts; Pieter C Dagnelie; Coen D A Stehouwer; Sjef van der Linden; Annelies Boonen Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2014-07-27 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Lisa K Stamp; Tony R Merriman; Murray L Barclay; Jasvinder A Singh; Rebecca L Roberts; Daniel F B Wright; Nicola Dalbeth Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: M S Hershfield; J T Callaghan; W Tassaneeyakul; T Mushiroda; C F Thorn; T E Klein; M T M Lee Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Rosane M S dos Santos; Sara M Oliveira; Cássia R Silva; Carin Hoffmeister; Juliano Ferreira; Jamil Assreuy Journal: Inflamm Res Date: 2013-03-30 Impact factor: 4.575
Authors: Simon Horsburgh; Pauline Norris; Gordon Becket; Bruce Arroll; Peter Crampton; Jacqueline Cumming; Shirley Keown; Peter Herbison Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2014-01-04 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Mohanraj Krishnan; Tanya J Major; Ruth K Topless; Ofa Dewes; Lennex Yu; John M D Thompson; Lesley McCowan; Janak de Zoysa; Lisa K Stamp; Nicola Dalbeth; Jennie Harré Hindmarsh; Nuku Rapana; Ranjan Deka; Winston W H Eng; Daniel E Weeks; Ryan L Minster; Stephen T McGarvey; Satupa'itea Viali; Take Naseri; Muagututi'a Sefuiva Reupena; Phillip Wilcox; David Grattan; Peter R Shepherd; Andrew N Shelling; Rinki Murphy; Tony R Merriman Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Humaira Rasheed; Amanda J Phipps-Green; Ruth Topless; Malcolm D Smith; Catherine Hill; Susan Lester; Maureen Rischmueller; Matthijs Janssen; Timothy L Jansen; Leo A Joosten; Timothy R Radstake; Philip L Riches; Anne-Kathrin Tausche; Frederic Lioté; Alexander So; Andre van Rij; Gregory T Jones; Sally P McCormick; Andrew A Harrison; Lisa K Stamp; Nicola Dalbeth; Tony R Merriman Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 7.580