Literature DB >> 26637198

Prognostic value of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bulky stage Ib2 and IIa cervical squamous cell cancer patients.

Yun Liang1, Bingjian Lü1, Xiaoduan Chen1, Jiale Qin2, Xiaodong Cheng2, Xing Xie2, Weiguo Lü3.   

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely used to treat patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Optimal pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy has proven to be a good prognostic indicator for patient survival, but the prognostic significance of a partial response remains unclear. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic predictors for patients with partial response. We included in the study 190 patients with bulky stage Ib2 or IIa cervical squamous cell cancer, who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. A novel pathological grading system, including optimal response (complete disappearance of tumor, grade 1), viable tumor cells occupying <(2)/3 (grade 2) or >(2)/3 (grade 3) of the tumor bed area and extra-cervical tumor deposits (grade 4), was developed and associations with disease-free survival and overall survival were studied. Survival analysis was conducted using log-rank testing and Cox regression analysis. We found statistically significant differences between 4 different pathological response groups both in terms of disease-free survival (p = 0.001) and overall survival (p = 0.003). Combining adjacent survival curves in the pathological grading system allowed us to identify response grade 2 patients with disease-free and overall survival similar to those of optimal response patients (p = 0.000, p = 0.002). Multivariate analyses showed that the pathological response grading system is the only independent predictor for progression-free survival and overall survival (p = 0.001 and p = 0.007). A response grading system based on pathological parameters may be useful to predict both progression-free and overall survival in bulky stage Ib2 and IIa cervical squamous cell cancer patients treated with NAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical squamous cell cancer; Disease-free survival; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Overall survival; Tumor regression

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26637198     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-015-1888-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  20 in total

1.  Randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comparing paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin with ifosfamide and cisplatin followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: the SNAP01 (Studio Neo-Adjuvante Portio) Italian Collaborative Study.

Authors:  Alessandro Buda; Roldano Fossati; Nicoletta Colombo; Francesca Fei; Irene Floriani; Desiderio Gueli Alletti; Dionyssios Katsaros; Fabio Landoni; Andrea Lissoni; Carmine Malzoni; Enrico Sartori; Paolo Scollo; Valter Torri; Paolo Zola; Costantino Mangioni
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Morphological effects of radiochemotherapy on cervical carcinoma: a morphological study of 50 cases of hysterectomy specimens after neoadjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Gian Franco Zannoni; Valerio Gaetano Vellone; Arnaldo Carbone
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.762

3.  Outcome of stage IB2-IIB patients with bulky uterine cervical cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Kazunori Uegaki; Muneaki Shimada; Seiya Sato; Imari Deura; Jun Naniwa; Shinya Sato; Tetsuro Oishi; Hiroaki Itamochi; Tasuku Harada; Junzo Kigawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival.

Authors:  Keith N Ogston; Iain D Miller; Simon Payne; Andrew W Hutcheon; Tarun K Sarkar; Ian Smith; A Schofield; Steven D Heys
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Histological regression of squamous esophageal carcinoma assessed by percentage of residual viable cells after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is an important prognostic factor.

Authors:  Daniel King Hung Tong; Simon Law; Dora Lai Wan Kwong; Kwok Wah Chan; Alfred King Yin Lam; Kam Ho Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Long-term survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  P Benedetti-Panici; S Greggi; G Scambia; M Amoroso; M G Salerno; F Maneschi; G Cutillo; M P Paratore; N Scorpiglione; S Mancuso
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  [Results of different postoperative adjuvant therapies for stage Ib-IIa cervical carcinoma with risk factors].

Authors:  Hong-wu Wen; Wei-ping Huang; Tong-yu Liu; Ke Ma; Xia Tao; Li-rong Zhu; Qin-ping Liao
Journal:  Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2013-12

8.  Analysis of prognostic factors for patients with bulky squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Eriko Takatori; Tadahiro Shoji; Hideo Omi; Masahiro Kagabu; Fumiharu Miura; Satoshi Takeuchi; Seisuke Kumagai; Akira Yoshizaki; Akira Sato; Toru Sugiyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Brachytherapy for isolated vaginal recurrences from endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  A Colombo; G Cormio; F Placa; F Landoni; A Ardizzoia; A Gabriele; A Lissoni
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec

10.  Adjuvant chemotherapy, a valuable alternative option in selected patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shuang Li; Ting Hu; Yile Chen; Hang Zhou; Xiong Li; Xiaodong Cheng; Ru Yang; Shixuan Wang; Xing Xie; Ding Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Meta-analysis showing that early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts better survival among cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Zhilan Chen; Yachen Shi; Shixuan Wang; Qiping Lu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-21

2.  Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ and FOXP3+ lymphocytes before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yun Liang; Weiguo Lü; Xiaofei Zhang; Bingjian Lü
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 2.644

3.  Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy Improved the Prognosis in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients With Optimal Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Xiaojie Feng; Hongmin Chen; Lei Li; Ling Gao; Li Wang; Xupeng Bai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Cervical cancer systemic inflammation score: a novel predictor of prognosis.

Authors:  Ru-Ru Zheng; Min Huang; Chu Jin; Han-Chu Wang; Jiang-Tao Yu; Lin-Chai Zeng; Fei-Yun Zheng; Feng Lin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.