Literature DB >> 23592280

Outcome of stage IB2-IIB patients with bulky uterine cervical cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy.

Kazunori Uegaki1, Muneaki Shimada, Seiya Sato, Imari Deura, Jun Naniwa, Shinya Sato, Tetsuro Oishi, Hiroaki Itamochi, Tasuku Harada, Junzo Kigawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We performed a retrospective study to clarify the outcome of stage IB2-IIB patients with bulky cervical cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant treatment.
METHODS: Sixty-five patients with bulky stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer, treated at Tottori University Hospital between 2001 and 2011, were examined retrospectively. The indication for adjuvant treatment was limited to the following pathological high-risk factors: pelvic lymph node (PLN) involvement, parametrial infiltration (PI), and a compromised surgical margin.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 14 non-SCC. Three patients were ineligible for radical hysterectomy after NAC, and underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy. In 62 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy, 13 had only PLN involvement and 6 only PI, and 10 had both PLN involvement and PI. In 33 patients who had no adjuvant treatment, 6 recurred, and only one underwent salvage chemotherapy. In 29 patients who underwent adjuvant treatment, 15 recurred and 11 died. Multivariate Cox proportional analysis revealed that PLN involvement was an independent prognostic factor.
CONCLUSIONS: Even if the indication for adjuvant treatment is limited to only high-risk patients, about 70 % of stage IB2-IIB patients with bulky cervical cancer could be cured by NAC followed by radical hysterectomy. Additionally, about 40 % of those patients could be cured without adjuvant treatment. In contrast, the strategy for patients with PLN involvement, who account for about 35 % of stage IB2-IIB bulky cervical cancer after NAC, should be carefully reconsidered based on quality of life and cost-effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23592280     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-013-0559-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  19 in total

1.  18F-FDG PET/CT can predict nodal metastases but not recurrence in early stage uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Cinzia Crivellaro; Mauro Signorelli; Luca Guerra; Elena De Ponti; Alessandro Buda; Carlotta Dolci; Cecilia Pirovano; Sergio Todde; Robert Fruscio; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer.

Authors:  M A Quinn; J L Benedet; F Odicino; P Maisonneuve; U Beller; W T Creasman; A P M Heintz; H Y S Ngan; S Pecorelli
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.561

3.  What is the standard therapy for bulky stage IB cervical cancer?

Authors:  Bradley J Monk; Wui-Jin Koh
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Chemoradiotherapy: the new standard care for invasive cervical cancer.

Authors:  P G Rose
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Incidence and risk factors of lower-extremity lymphedema after radical surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with FIGO stage I to stage IIA cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jin Hwi Kim; Ji Hyang Choi; Eun Young Ki; Sung Jong Lee; Joo Hee Yoon; Keun Ho Lee; Tae Chul Park; Jong Sup Park; Seog Nyeon Bae; Soo Young Hur
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.437

6.  Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  W A Peters; P Y Liu; R J Barrett; R J Stock; B J Monk; J S Berek; L Souhami; P Grigsby; W Gordon; D S Alberts
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Stromal invasion of the cervix can be excluded from the criteria for using adjuvant radiotherapy following radical surgery for patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Muneaki Shimada; Junzo Kigawa; Masakuni Takahashi; Yukihisa Minagawa; Makoto Okada; Yasunobu Kanamori; Hiroaki Itamochi; Tetsuro Oishi; Takahiro Iba; Naoki Terakawa
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  H M Keys; B N Bundy; F B Stehman; L I Muderspach; W E Chafe; C L Suggs; J L Walker; D Gersell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Radical hysterectomy followed by tailored postoperative therapy in the treatment of stage IB2 cervical cancer: feasibility and indications for adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Annie Yessaian; Alessandra Magistris; Robert A Burger; Bradley J Monk
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Risk factors for lower limb lymphedema after lymph node dissection in patients with ovarian and uterine carcinoma.

Authors:  Harue Tada; Satoshi Teramukai; Masanori Fukushima; Hiroshi Sasaki
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  6 in total

1.  Prognostic value of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bulky stage Ib2 and IIa cervical squamous cell cancer patients.

Authors:  Yun Liang; Bingjian Lü; Xiaoduan Chen; Jiale Qin; Xiaodong Cheng; Xing Xie; Weiguo Lü
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  A Fifteen-Gene Classifier to Predict Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Responses in Patients with Stage IB to IIB Squamous Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Xun Tian; Xin Wang; Zifeng Cui; Jia Liu; Xiaoyuan Huang; Caixia Shi; Min Zhang; Ting Liu; Xiaofang Du; Rui Li; Lei Huang; Danni Gong; Rui Tian; Chen Cao; Ping Jin; Zhen Zeng; Guangxin Pan; Meng Xia; Hongfeng Zhang; Bo Luo; Yonghui Xie; Xiaoming Li; Tianye Li; Jun Wu; Qinghua Zhang; Gang Chen; Zheng Hu
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 16.806

3.  CD34 and Bcl-2 as predictors for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yun Lin; Zhi Li; Mubiao Liu; Haiyan Ye; Jianhui He; Jianguo Chen
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Phase II clinical study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CDDP/CPT-11 regimen in combination with radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer with a bulky mass.

Authors:  Tadahiro Shoji; Eriko Takatori; Yoko Furutake; Anna Takada; Takayuki Nagasawa; Hideo Omi; Masahiro Kagabu; Tatsuya Honda; Fumiharu Miura; Satoshi Takeuchi; Seisuke Kumagai; Akira Yoshizaki; Akira Sato; Toru Sugiyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Chemoradiotherapy in combination with radical surgery is associated with better outcome in cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Dan Zheng; Hua-Ping Mou; Peng Diao; Xiao-Ming Li; Chuan-Li Zhang; Jing Jiang; Jia-Lian Chen; Li-Shuai Wang; Qiu Wang; Guang-Yuan Zhou; Jie Chen; Chuan Lin; Zhi-Ping Yuan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-08

6.  Clinical outcome of FIGO 2018 stage IB3/IIA2 cervical cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery due to lack of radiotherapy equipment: A retrospective comparison with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Jing Zeng; Peisong Sun; Quanhong Ping; Shan Jiang; Yuanjing Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.