Literature DB >> 26631509

An Analysis of the Sensitivity of Proteogenomic Mapping of Somatic Mutations and Novel Splicing Events in Cancer.

Kelly V Ruggles1, Zuojian Tang1, Xuya Wang1, Himanshu Grover1, Manor Askenazi2, Jennifer Teubl1, Song Cao3, Michael D McLellan3, Karl R Clauser4, David L Tabb5, Philipp Mertins4, Robbert Slebos5, Petra Erdmann-Gilmore3, Shunqiang Li3, Harsha P Gunawardena6, Ling Xie6, Tao Liu7, Jian-Ying Zhou8, Shisheng Sun8, Katherine A Hoadley6, Charles M Perou6, Xian Chen6, Sherri R Davies3, Christopher A Maher3, Christopher R Kinsinger9, Karen D Rodland7, Hui Zhang8, Zhen Zhang8, Li Ding3, R Reid Townsend3, Henry Rodriguez9, Daniel Chan8, Richard D Smith7, Daniel C Liebler5, Steven A Carr4, Samuel Payne10, Matthew J Ellis11, David Fenyő12.   

Abstract

Improvements in mass spectrometry (MS)-based peptide sequencing provide a new opportunity to determine whether polymorphisms, mutations, and splice variants identified in cancer cells are translated. Herein, we apply a proteogenomic data integration tool (QUILTS) to illustrate protein variant discovery using whole genome, whole transcriptome, and global proteome datasets generated from a pair of luminal and basal-like breast-cancer-patient-derived xenografts (PDX). The sensitivity of proteogenomic analysis for singe nucleotide variant (SNV) expression and novel splice junction (NSJ) detection was probed using multiple MS/MS sample process replicates defined here as an independent tandem MS experiment using identical sample material. Despite analysis of over 30 sample process replicates, only about 10% of SNVs (somatic and germline) detected by both DNA and RNA sequencing were observed as peptides. An even smaller proportion of peptides corresponding to NSJ observed by RNA sequencing were detected (<0.1%). Peptides mapping to DNA-detected SNVs without a detectable mRNA transcript were also observed, suggesting that transcriptome coverage was incomplete (∼80%). In contrast to germline variants, somatic variants were less likely to be detected at the peptide level in the basal-like tumor than in the luminal tumor, raising the possibility of differential translation or protein degradation effects. In conclusion, this large-scale proteogenomic integration allowed us to determine the degree to which mutations are translated and identify gaps in sequence coverage, thereby benchmarking current technology and progress toward whole cancer proteome and transcriptome analysis.
© 2016 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26631509      PMCID: PMC4813688          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M115.056226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  31 in total

1.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Aaron McKenna; Matthew Hanna; Eric Banks; Andrey Sivachenko; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrew Kernytsky; Kiran Garimella; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Mark Daly; Mark A DePristo
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Screening the human exome: a comparison of whole genome and whole transcriptome sequencing.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Cirulli; Abanish Singh; Kevin V Shianna; Dongliang Ge; Jason P Smith; Jessica M Maia; Erin L Heinzen; James J Goedert; David B Goldstein
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 13.583

3.  De novo assembly and validation of planaria transcriptome by massive parallel sequencing and shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Catherine Adamidi; Yongbo Wang; Dominic Gruen; Guido Mastrobuoni; Xintian You; Dominic Tolle; Matthias Dodt; Sebastian D Mackowiak; Andreas Gogol-Doering; Pinar Oenal; Agnieszka Rybak; Eric Ross; Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado; Stefan Kempa; Christoph Dieterich; Nikolaus Rajewsky; Wei Chen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  A bioinformatics workflow for variant peptide detection in shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Jing Li; Zengliu Su; Ze-Qiang Ma; Robbert J C Slebos; Patrick Halvey; David L Tabb; Daniel C Liebler; William Pao; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Pindel: a pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads.

Authors:  Kai Ye; Marcel H Schulz; Quan Long; Rolf Apweiler; Zemin Ning
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Genome remodelling in a basal-like breast cancer metastasis and xenograft.

Authors:  Li Ding; Matthew J Ellis; Shunqiang Li; David E Larson; Ken Chen; John W Wallis; Christopher C Harris; Michael D McLellan; Robert S Fulton; Lucinda L Fulton; Rachel M Abbott; Jeremy Hoog; David J Dooling; Daniel C Koboldt; Heather Schmidt; Joelle Kalicki; Qunyuan Zhang; Lei Chen; Ling Lin; Michael C Wendl; Joshua F McMichael; Vincent J Magrini; Lisa Cook; Sean D McGrath; Tammi L Vickery; Elizabeth Appelbaum; Katherine Deschryver; Sherri Davies; Therese Guintoli; Li Lin; Robert Crowder; Yu Tao; Jacqueline E Snider; Scott M Smith; Adam F Dukes; Gabriel E Sanderson; Craig S Pohl; Kim D Delehaunty; Catrina C Fronick; Kimberley A Pape; Jerry S Reed; Jody S Robinson; Jennifer S Hodges; William Schierding; Nathan D Dees; Dong Shen; Devin P Locke; Madeline E Wiechert; James M Eldred; Josh B Peck; Benjamin J Oberkfell; Justin T Lolofie; Feiyu Du; Amy E Hawkins; Michelle D O'Laughlin; Kelly E Bernard; Mark Cunningham; Glendoria Elliott; Mark D Mason; Dominic M Thompson; Jennifer L Ivanovich; Paul J Goodfellow; Charles M Perou; George M Weinstock; Rebecca Aft; Mark Watson; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson; Elaine R Mardis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes.

Authors:  Joel S Parker; Michael Mullins; Maggie C U Cheang; Samuel Leung; David Voduc; Tammi Vickery; Sherri Davies; Christiane Fauron; Xiaping He; Zhiyuan Hu; John F Quackenbush; Inge J Stijleman; Juan Palazzo; J S Marron; Andrew B Nobel; Elaine Mardis; Torsten O Nielsen; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Philip S Bernard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The utility of mass spectrometry-based proteomic data for validation of novel alternative splice forms reconstructed from RNA-Seq data: a preliminary assessment.

Authors:  Kang Ning; Alexey I Nesvizhskii
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Alternative splice variants, a new class of protein cancer biomarker candidates: findings in pancreatic cancer and breast cancer with systems biology implications.

Authors:  Gilbert S Omenn; Anastasia K Yocum; Rajasree Menon
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.434

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  Moonshot Objectives: Catalyze New Scientific Breakthroughs-Proteogenomics.

Authors:  Karin D Rodland; Paul Piehowski; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  A Curated Resource for Phosphosite-specific Signature Analysis.

Authors:  Karsten Krug; Philipp Mertins; Bin Zhang; Peter Hornbeck; Rajesh Raju; Rushdy Ahmad; Matthew Szucs; Filip Mundt; Dominique Forestier; Judit Jane-Valbuena; Hasmik Keshishian; Michael A Gillette; Pablo Tamayo; Jill P Mesirov; Jacob D Jaffe; Steven A Carr; D R Mani
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 3.  Methods, Tools and Current Perspectives in Proteogenomics.

Authors:  Kelly V Ruggles; Karsten Krug; Xiaojing Wang; Karl R Clauser; Jing Wang; Samuel H Payne; David Fenyö; Bing Zhang; D R Mani
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Single Amino Acid Variant Profiles of Subpopulations in the MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cell Line.

Authors:  Zhijing Tan; Song Nie; Sean P McDermott; Max S Wicha; David M Lubman
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  JUMPg: An Integrative Proteogenomics Pipeline Identifying Unannotated Proteins in Human Brain and Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Yuxin Li; Xusheng Wang; Ji-Hoon Cho; Timothy I Shaw; Zhiping Wu; Bing Bai; Hong Wang; Suiping Zhou; Thomas G Beach; Gang Wu; Jinghui Zhang; Junmin Peng
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Proteogenomic Characterization of Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yongchao Dou; Emily A Kawaler; Daniel Cui Zhou; Marina A Gritsenko; Chen Huang; Lili Blumenberg; Alla Karpova; Vladislav A Petyuk; Sara R Savage; Shankha Satpathy; Wenke Liu; Yige Wu; Chia-Feng Tsai; Bo Wen; Zhi Li; Song Cao; Jamie Moon; Zhiao Shi; MacIntosh Cornwell; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Rosalie K Chu; Suhas Vasaikar; Hua Zhou; Qingsong Gao; Ronald J Moore; Kai Li; Sunantha Sethuraman; Matthew E Monroe; Rui Zhao; David Heiman; Karsten Krug; Karl Clauser; Ramani Kothadia; Yosef Maruvka; Alexander R Pico; Amanda E Oliphant; Emily L Hoskins; Samuel L Pugh; Sean J I Beecroft; David W Adams; Jonathan C Jarman; Andy Kong; Hui-Yin Chang; Boris Reva; Yuxing Liao; Dmitry Rykunov; Antonio Colaprico; Xi Steven Chen; Andrzej Czekański; Marcin Jędryka; Rafał Matkowski; Maciej Wiznerowicz; Tara Hiltke; Emily Boja; Christopher R Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Ana I Robles; Henry Rodriguez; David Mutch; Katherine Fuh; Matthew J Ellis; Deborah DeLair; Mathangi Thiagarajan; D R Mani; Gad Getz; Michael Noble; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Pei Wang; Matthew L Anderson; Douglas A Levine; Richard D Smith; Samuel H Payne; Kelly V Ruggles; Karin D Rodland; Li Ding; Bing Zhang; Tao Liu; David Fenyö
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Quantitative Mass Spectrometry to Interrogate Proteomic Heterogeneity in Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma and Validate a Novel Somatic Mutation CDK12-G879V.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Khoa Dang Nguyen; Paul A Rudnick; Nitin Roper; Emily Kawaler; Tapan K Maity; Shivangi Awasthi; Shaojian Gao; Romi Biswas; Abhilash Venugopalan; Constance M Cultraro; David Fenyö; Udayan Guha
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 8.  Clinical potential of mass spectrometry-based proteogenomics.

Authors:  Bing Zhang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Geoffrey S Baird; Karin D Rodland; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Proteogenomic Landscape of Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis and Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Karsten Krug; Eric J Jaehnig; Shankha Satpathy; Lili Blumenberg; Alla Karpova; Meenakshi Anurag; George Miles; Philipp Mertins; Yifat Geffen; Lauren C Tang; David I Heiman; Song Cao; Yosef E Maruvka; Jonathan T Lei; Chen Huang; Ramani B Kothadia; Antonio Colaprico; Chet Birger; Jarey Wang; Yongchao Dou; Bo Wen; Zhiao Shi; Yuxing Liao; Maciej Wiznerowicz; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Xi Steven Chen; Jacob J Kennedy; Amanda G Paulovich; Mathangi Thiagarajan; Christopher R Kinsinger; Tara Hiltke; Emily S Boja; Mehdi Mesri; Ana I Robles; Henry Rodriguez; Thomas F Westbrook; Li Ding; Gad Getz; Karl R Clauser; David Fenyö; Kelly V Ruggles; Bing Zhang; D R Mani; Steven A Carr; Matthew J Ellis; Michael A Gillette
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Human Proteome Project Mass Spectrometry Data Interpretation Guidelines 2.1.

Authors:  Eric W Deutsch; Christopher M Overall; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Mark S Baker; Young-Ki Paik; Susan T Weintraub; Lydie Lane; Lennart Martens; Yves Vandenbrouck; Ulrike Kusebauch; William S Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Ruedi Aebersold; Robert L Moritz; Gilbert S Omenn
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.