Literature DB >> 26630607

Transforming Scientific Inquiry: Tapping Into Digital Data by Building a Culture of Transparency and Consent.

Robert J Smith1, David Grande, Raina M Merchant.   

Abstract

With over 1.7 billion individuals engaged in social media, patients and consumers share more about their lives than ever before through wearable devices, smartphone applications, and social media outlets. This cornucopia of data offers significant opportunity for health researchers and clinicians to track and explore how digital presence contributes to patients' health outcomes and use of health care resources. While patients readily share their information with online communities, it is imperative that they maintain a sense of autonomy over who has access to such data. Recent data breaches of major insurance companies and retailers illustrate the challenges and vulnerabilities related to information safety and privacy. Many Web sites and mobile apps require users to agree to data policies, but how those data are mined, protected, used, and externally shared is frequently nontransparent, resulting in a climate of fear and distrust around all forums of digital information sharing. Although such skepticism is perhaps justified, it should not deter health researchers from attempting to collect and analyze these novel data for the purpose of designing unique health interventions. By clarifying intent around digital data acquisition, simplifying consent procedures, and affirming a commitment to privacy, the authors contend that health researchers can partner with patients to transform the boundaries of scientific inquiry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26630607      PMCID: PMC4811677          DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  15 in total

Review 1.  Securing electronic health records without impeding the flow of information.

Authors:  Rakesh Agrawal; Christopher Johnson
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Tracking suicide risk factors through Twitter in the US.

Authors:  Jared Jashinsky; Scott H Burton; Carl L Hanson; Josh West; Christophe Giraud-Carrier; Michael D Barnes; Trenton Argyle
Journal:  Crisis       Date:  2014

3.  Informed consent in clinical care: practical considerations in the effort to achieve ethical goals.

Authors:  Yael Schenker; Alan Meisel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change.

Authors:  Mitesh S Patel; David A Asch; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data.

Authors:  Meredith A Case; Holland A Burwick; Kevin G Volpp; Mitesh S Patel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Guidelines for using electronic and social media: the regulatory perspective.

Authors:  Nancy Spector; Dawn M Kappel
Journal:  Online J Issues Nurs       Date:  2012-09-30

7.  Mobile health technology evaluation: the mHealth evidence workshop.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar; Wendy J Nilsen; Amy Abernethy; Audie Atienza; Kevin Patrick; Misha Pavel; William T Riley; Albert Shar; Bonnie Spring; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Donald Hedeker; Vasant Honavar; Richard Kravitz; R Craig Lefebvre; David C Mohr; Susan A Murphy; Charlene Quinn; Vladimir Shusterman; Dallas Swendeman
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Using technology to expedite screening and intervention for domestic abuse and neglect.

Authors:  Joellen W Hawkins; Carole W Pearce; Jackie Skeith; Beth Dimitruk; Ritajean Roche
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.462

9.  Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records.

Authors:  Kelly Caine; Rima Hanania
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Adult Willingness to Use Email and Social Media for Peer-to-Peer Cancer Screening Communication: Quantitative Interview Study.

Authors:  Sarah L Cutrona; Douglas W Roblin; Joann L Wagner; Bridget Gaglio; Andrew E Williams; Rosalie Torres Stone; Terry S Field; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2013-11-28
View more
  3 in total

1.  Mobile health ethics and the expanding role of autonomy.

Authors:  Bettina Schmietow; Georg Marckmann
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2019-12

Review 2.  A Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) statement on closed social media (Facebook®) groups for clinical education and consultation: issues of informed consent, patient privacy, and surgeon protection.

Authors:  James G Bittner; Heather J Logghe; Erica D Kane; Ross F Goldberg; Adnan Alseidi; Rajesh Aggarwal; Brian P Jacob
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Acceptability of electronic healthcare predictive analytics for HIV prevention: a qualitative study with men who have sex with men in New York City.

Authors:  Jennifer J Mootz; Henry Evans; Jack Tocco; Christian Vivar Ramon; Peter Gordon; Milton L Wainberg; Michael T Yin
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2020-04-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.