| Literature DB >> 26629688 |
Sarah Spengler1, Filip Mess1, Alexander Woll2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The displacement hypothesis predicts that physical activity and media use compete in adolescents; however, findings are inconsistent. A more differentiated approach at determining the co-occurrence of physical activity and media use behaviors within subjects may be warranted. The aim of this study was to determine the co-occurrence of physical activity and media use by identifying clusters of adolescents with specific behavior patterns including physical activity in various settings (school, sports club, leisure time) and different types of media use (watching TV, playing console games, using PC / Internet).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26629688 PMCID: PMC4668009 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142544
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Mean ± SD number of hours per week (PA) / day (media) spent on different leisure activities separated by socio-demographic variables.
| N | Voluntary PA school (h / week) ±SD | PA sports club (h / week) ±SD | PA leisure time (h / week) ±SD | TV (h / day) ±SD | Console games (h / day) ±SD | PC / Internet (h / day) ±SD | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 1031 | 0.4±1.0 |
| 2.1±2.2 |
| 1.4±2.4 |
| 1.7±1.2 |
| 0.8±1.0 |
| 1.3±1.3 | |
|
| 1052 | 0.3±0.8 | 1.5±2.0 | 0.9±1.7 | 1.4±1.1 | 0.2±0.5 | 1.3±1.2 | |||||||
|
|
| 953 | 0.4±0.9 |
| 1.8±1.9 |
| 1.0±1.9 |
| 1.4±1.1 |
| 0.5±0.7 |
| 0.9±1.0 |
|
|
| 1130 | 0.3±0.9 | 1.8±2.3 | 1.2±2.2 | 1.7±1.2 | 0.7±0.9 | 1.7±1.4 | |||||||
|
|
| 196 | 0.4±0.9 | 1.3±2.1 |
| 1.0±2.5 |
| 1.9±1.3 |
| 0.7±1.0 |
| 1.5±1.5 | ||
|
| 1362 | 0.4±0.9 | 1.7±2.0 | 1.1±2.1 | 1.6±1.2 | 0.5±0.9 | 1.3±1.3 | |||||||
|
| 523 | 0.4±1.0 | 2.3±2.3 | 1.2±1.8 | 1.3±1.0 | 0.3±0.7 | 1.2±1.1 | |||||||
|
| 2083 | 0.4±0.9 | 1.8±2.1 | 1.1±2.1 | 1.6±1.2 | 0.5±0.8 | 1.3±1.3 | |||||||
SES = socio-economic status
a significance level examined using Mann-Whitney tests
b significance level examined using Kruskal-Wallis tests
* p < .05
** p < .01
Fig 1Mean hours of PA per week and media use (per day in boys’ clusters.
Fig 2Mean hours of PA per week and media use per day in girls’ clusters.
Z-scores of the final cluster solution in boys and socio-demographic correlates.
| M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | M6 | M7 | M8 | Total | Sig. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 343 (33.3) | 126 (12.2) | 147 (14.3) | 50 (4.8) | 53 (5.1) | 65 (6.3) | 50 (4.8) | 197 (19.1) | 1031 (100) | |||
|
| -.22 | -.21 | -.29 | -.05 | -.12 | 3.06 | -.02 | -.22 | 0 | |||
|
| -.54 | -.46 | -.39 | -.35 | -.31 | .39 | 2.78 | .87 | 0 | |||
|
| -.20 | -.30 | -.14 | -.19 | 3.18 | -.04 | -.05 | -.13 | 0 | |||
|
| -.53 | .42 | .97 | 1.57 | -.16 | 0 | .19 | -.46 | 0 | |||
|
| -.42 | 1.15 | -.39 | 2.98 | -.12 | .04 | -.35 | -.35 | 0 | |||
|
| -.52 | -.21 | 1.32 | 1.63 | .08 | -.14 | .18 | -.38 | 0 | |||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| 60.9 | 41.3 | 22.4 | 26.0 | 45.3 | 49.2 | 24.0 | 51.3 | 46.2 |
| |
|
| 39.1 | 58.7 | 77.6 | 74.0 | 54.7 | 50.8 | 76.0 | 48.7 | 53.8 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| 8.2 | 14.3 | 13.6 | 12.0 | 7.7 | 6.2 | 12.0 | 6.6 | 9.6 |
| |
|
| 65.2 | 71.4 | 61.9 | 78.0 | 71.2 | 67.7 | 58.0 | 56.9 | 64.6 | |||
|
| 26.6 | 14.3 | 24.5 | 10.0 | 21.2 | 26.2 | 30.0 | 36.5 | 25.8 | |||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
SES = socio-economic status
** p < .01
a significantly different to M1 (p<0.0017)
b significantly different to M2 (p<0.0017)
c significantly different to M3 (p<0.0017)
d significantly different to M4 (p<0.0017)
e significantly different to M6 (p<0.0017)
f significantly different to M7 (p<0.0017)
g significantly different to M8 (p<0.0017)
Z-scores of the final cluster solution in girls and socio-demographic correlates.
| F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | Total | Sig. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 443 (42.1) | 97 (9.2) | 164 (15.6) | 65 (6.2) | 54 (5.1) | 105 (10.0) | 124 (11.8) | 1052 (100) | ||
|
| -.32 | -.30 | -.23 | -.13 | -.01 | 2.34 | -.22 | 0 | ||
|
| -.37 | -.37 | -.32 | -.23 | -.11 | .30 | 1.94 | 0 | ||
|
| -.20 | -.04 | -.25 | -.24 | 3.10 | -.02 | -.14 | 0 | ||
|
| -.53 | 1.45 | .76 | .73 | -.11 | -.28 | -.22 | 0 | ||
|
| -.23 | -.13 | -.24 | 3.18 | -.27 | -.12 | -.22 | 0 | ||
|
| -.44 | -.37 | 1.62 | .64 | -.19 | -.35 | -.21 | 0 | ||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
| 49.0 | 45.4 | 25.0 | 49.2 | 38.9 | 54.3 | 52.4 | 45.3 |
|
|
| 51.0 | 54.6 | 75.0 | 50.8 | 61.1 | 45.7 | 47.6 | 54.7 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
| 6.8 | 17.5 | 11.6 | 16.9 | 11.1 | 7.6 | 4.8 | 9.2 |
|
|
| 64.8 | 69.1 | 72.0 | 72.3 | 63.0 | 67.6 | 58.9 | 66.3 | ||
|
| 28.4 | 13.4 | 16.5 | 10.8 | 25.9 | 24.8 | 35.3 | 24.5 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
SES = socio-economic status
** p < .01
a significantly different to F1 (p<0.0023)
b significantly different to F2 (p<0.0023)
c significantly different to F3 (p<0.0023)
d significantly different to F4 (p<0.0023)
e significantly different to F6 (p<0.0023)
f significantly different to F7 (p<0.0023)