| Literature DB >> 29703168 |
Tanja Poulain1,2, Thomas Peschel3, Mandy Vogel3,4, Anne Jurkutat3, Wieland Kiess3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have already reported associations of media consumption and/or physical activity with school achievement. However, longitudinal studies investigating independent effects of physical activity and media consumption on school performance are sparse. The present study fills this research gap and, furthermore, assesses relationships of the type of secondary school with media consumption and physical activity.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; Longitudinal; Media consumption; Physical activity; School achievement; Type of school
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29703168 PMCID: PMC5924472 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5489-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Description of the assessed variables at baseline by type of secondary school
| Total | Highest secondary school | Lower secondary schools | Possible range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 850) | (n = 574) | (n = 276) | ||
|
|
|
| ||
| Consumption of screen-based media (hours/day) | ||||
| TV/video | 1.66 (1.29) | 1.27 (1.13) | 2.08 (1.49) | 0-5 |
| Game console | 0.71 (1.14) | 0.54 (.91) | 1.05 (1.46) | 0-5 |
| PC/internet | 1.50 (1.41) | 1.44 (1.34) | 1.64 (1.54) | 0-5 |
| Mobile phone | 1.42 (1.65) | 1.33 (1.60) | 1.61 (1.75) | 0-5 |
| Total screen time | 5.31 (3.66) | 4.79 (3.29) | 6.38 (4.15) | 0-20 |
| Physical activity (training sessions/week) | ||||
| PA organized | 1.76 (1.73) | 1.91 (1.74) | 1.43 (1.67) | 0-6 |
| PA non-organized | 2.17 (2.02) | 2.18 (1.99) | 2.15 (2.08) | 0-6 |
| Total physical activity | 3.93 (2.83) | 4.10 (2.81) | 3.58 (2.88) | 0-12 |
| School grades | ||||
| Mathematics | 2.64 (0.85) | 2.53 (0.85) | 2.89 (0.80) | 1-4 |
| German | 2.34 (0.76) | 2.20 (0.74) | 2.61 (0.72) | 1-4 |
| Physical Education | 2.16 (0.86) | 1.98 (0.78) | 2.53 (0.90) | 1-4 |
Better school achievement is represented by lower school grades (following the German grading system). PA physical activity
Associations of the consumption of different screen-based media and physical activities with type of school (highest vs. lower secondary school) at baseline
| Dependent variables: Screen-based media and physical activity | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent variable | TV/video | Game console | PC/internet | Mobile phone | PA organized | PA non-organized | |
| Type of school a |
| 0.25** | 0.27** | -0.08 | 0.17 | -0.25 | 0.20 |
All associations are adjusted for gender, age, SES, year of data assessment, BMI, and other indicators of screen-based media consumption and physical activity.
b = regression coefficient, non-standardized, PA physical activity
areference = highest secondary school
**p < 0.01
Fig. 1Association of total screen time at baseline with grades in Mathematics at follow-up.
Longitudinal analysis: Prediction of school grades at follow-up by the consumption of different screen-based media and different forms of physical activity at baseline
| Outcomes at follow-up: school grades in | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictors at baseline | Mathematics | German | Physical Education | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| TV/video | -0.01 | -0.06 - 0.05 | -0.02 | -0.07 - 0.03 | 0.07** | 0.02 - 0.13 |
| Game console | 0.04 | -0.02 - 0.11 | 0.02 | -0.04 - 0.08 | 0.01 | -0.06 - 0.07 |
| PC/internet | 0.07* | 0.01 - 0.12 | 0.04 | -0.01 - 0.09 | 0.02 | -0.03 - 0.07 |
| Mobile phone | 0.01 | -0.03 - 0.06 | 0.01 | -0.04 - 0.04 | -0.02 | -0.06 - 0.02 |
| PA organized | -0.01 | -0.04 - 0.03 | -0.02 | -0.05 - 0.01 | -0.03 | -0.06 - 0.01 |
| PA non-organized | 0.03 | -0.01 - 0.05 | -0.01 | -0.03 - 0.02 | -0.07*** | -0.11 - -0.04a |
Better school achievement is reflected by lower school grades (following the German grading system). All associations are adjusted for gender, age, SES, year of data assessment, BMI, type of school, the other predictors, and grades at baseline.
b = regression coefficient, non-standardized, PA physical activity
ain girls only, as revealed by a significant interaction between non-organized PA and grades in Physical Education
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < .001.
Fig. 2Association of total physical activity at baseline with grades in Physical Education at follow-up.
Fig. 3Association of non-organized physical activity at baseline with grades in Physical Education at follow-up as a function of participants’ gender.