Literature DB >> 21539590

Social amplification of risk in the Internet environment.

Ik Jae Chung1.   

Abstract

This article analyzes the dynamic process of risk amplification in the Internet environment with special emphasis on public concern for environmental risks from a high-speed railway tunnel construction project in South Korea. Environmental organizations and activists serving as social stations collected information about the project and its ecological impact, and communicated this with the general public, social groups, and institutions. The Internet provides social stations and the public with an efficient means for interactive communication and an open space for active information sharing and public participation. For example, while the website of an organization such as an environmental activist group can initially trigger local interest, the Internet allows this information to be disseminated to a much wider audience in a manner unavailable to the traditional media. Interaction among social stations demonstrates an amplifying process of public attention to the risk. Analyses of the volume of readers' comments to online newspaper articles and public opinions posted on message board of public and nonprofit organizations show the ripple effects of the amplification process as measured along temporal, geographical, and sectoral dimensions. Public attention is also influenced by the symbolic connotations of risk information. Interpretations of risk in religious, political, or legal terms intensify public concern for the environmental risk.
© 2011 Society for Risk Analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21539590     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01623.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  8 in total

1.  A cross-hazard analysis of terse message retransmission on Twitter.

Authors:  Jeannette Sutton; C Ben Gibson; Nolan Edward Phillips; Emma S Spiro; Cedar League; Britta Johnson; Sean M Fitzhugh; Carter T Butts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Social media in disaster risk reduction and crisis management.

Authors:  David E Alexander
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Vaccine confidence in China after the Changsheng vaccine incident: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Baohua Liu; Ruohui Chen; Miaomiao Zhao; Xin Zhang; Jiahui Wang; Lijun Gao; Jiao Xu; Qunhong Wu; Ning Ning
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  An Empirical Study on the Influence Path of Environmental Risk Perception on Behavioral Responses In China.

Authors:  Shan Gao; Weimin Li; Shuang Ling; Xin Dou; Xiaozhou Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Environmental and public health co-benefits of consumer switches to immunity-supporting food.

Authors:  Ayesha I T Tulloch; Rachel R Y Oh; Danielle Gallegos
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 6.943

6.  Internet Use and Quality of Life: The Multiple Mediating Effects of Risk Perception and Internet Addiction.

Authors:  Bo Qian; Mengmeng Huang; Mengyi Xu; Yuxiang Hong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Risk sharing on Twitter: Social amplification and attenuation of risk in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Xiaochen Angela Zhang; Raluca Cozma
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2021-08-14

8.  Evolution Model and Simulation Study of the Public Risk Perception of COVID-19.

Authors:  Ao Zhang; Hao Yang; Zhenlei Tian; Shuning Tong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.614

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.