Literature DB >> 26626457

Factors affecting computed tomography image quality for assessment of mechanical aortic valves.

Young Joo Suh1, Young Jin Kim2, Yoo Jin Hong1, Hye-Jeong Lee1, Jin Hur1, Sae Rom Hong1, Dong Jin Im1, Yun Jung Kim1, Byoung Wook Choi1.   

Abstract

Evaluating mechanical valves with computed tomography (CT) can be problematic because artifacts from the metallic components of valves can hamper image quality. The purpose of this study was to determine factors affecting the image quality of cardiac CT to improve assessment of mechanical aortic valves. A total of 144 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with mechanical valves (ten different types) and who underwent cardiac CT were included. Using a four-point grading system, the image quality of the CT scans was assessed for visibility of the valve leaflets and the subvalvular regions. Data regarding the type of mechanical valve, tube voltage, average heart rate (HR), and HR variability during CT scanning were compared between the non-diagnostic (overall image quality score ≤2) and diagnostic (overall image quality score >2) image quality groups. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of non-diagnostic image quality. The percentage of valve types that incorporated a cobalt-chrome component (two types in total) and HR variability were significantly higher in the non-diagnostic image group than in the diagnostic group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.013, respectively). The average HR and tube voltage were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Valve type was the only independent predictor of non-diagnostic quality. The CT image quality for patients with mechanical aortic valves differed significantly depending on the type of mechanical valve used and on the degree of HR variability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve replacement; Cardiac computed tomography; Image quality; Mechanical valves; Valve type

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26626457     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0817-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis with prospectively ECG-triggered axial CT angiography versus retrospective technique: a phantom study.

Authors:  W-J Yang; Z-L Pan; H Zhang; L-F Pang; Y Guo; K-M Chen
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Automatic Tube Potential Selection with Tube Current Modulation (APSCM) in coronary CT angiography: Comparison of image quality and radiation dose with conventional body mass index-based protocol.

Authors:  Young Jean Park; Young Jin Kim; Ji Won Lee; Hee Yeong Kim; Yoo Jin Hong; Hye-Jeong Lee; Jin Hur; Ji Eun Nam; Byoung Wook Choi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2012-04-06

3.  Combined use of automatic tube potential selection with tube current modulation and iterative reconstruction technique in coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Young Joo Suh; Young Jin Kim; Sae Rom Hong; Yoo Jin Hong; Hye-Jeong Lee; Jin Hur; Byoung Wook Choi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT coronary angiography: a systematic review of radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Kwan-Hoong Ng
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 5.  Echo/Doppler evaluation of hemodynamics after aortic valve replacement: principles of interrogation and evaluation of high gradients.

Authors:  David S Bach
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-03

6.  Multidetector-row computed tomography imaging characteristics of mechanical prosthetic valves.

Authors:  Petr Symersky; Ricardo P J Budde; Mathias Prokop; Bas A J M de Mol
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2011-03

7.  Artefacts in spiral-CT images and their relation to pitch and subject morphology.

Authors:  J E Wilting; J Timmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Evaluation of anatomic valve opening and leaflet morphology in aortic valve bioprosthesis by using multidetector CT: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Fabien Chenot; Patrick Montant; Céline Goffinet; Agnès Pasquet; David Vancraeynest; Emmanuel Coche; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde; Bernhard L Gerber
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Noninvasive coronary angiography using dual-source computed tomography in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Carsten Rist; Thorsten R Johnson; Jens Müller-Starck; Elisabeth Arnoldi; Tobias Saam; Alexander Becker; Alexander W Leber; Bernd J Wintersperger; Christoph R Becker; Maximilian F Reiser; Konstantin Nikolaou
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Artifact reduction strategies for prosthetic heart valve CT imaging.

Authors:  Jesse Habets; Petr Symersky; Tim Leiner; Bas A J M de Mol; Willem P Th M Mali; Ricardo P J Budde
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.