Literature DB >> 26624989

A female pelvic bone shape model for air/bone separation in support of synthetic CT generation for radiation therapy.

Lianli Liu1, Yue Cao, Jeffrey A Fessler, Shruti Jolly, James M Balter.   

Abstract

Separating bone from air in MR data is one of the major challenges in using MR images to derive synthetic CT. The problem is further complicated when the anatomic regions filled with air are altered across scans due to air mobility, for instance, in pelvic regions, thereby the air regions estimated using an ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence are invalid in other image series acquired for multispectral classification. This study aims to develop and investigate a female pelvic bone shape model to identify low intensity regions in MRI where air is unlikely to be present in support of synthetic CT generation without UTE imaging. CT scans of 30 patients were collected for the study, 17 of them also have corresponding MR scans. The shape model was built from the CT dataset, where the reference image was aligned to each of the training images using B-spline deformable registration. Principal component analysis was performed on B-spline coefficients for a compact model where shape variance was described by linear combination of principal modes. The model was applied to identify pelvic bone in MR images by deforming the corresponding MR data of the reference image to target MR images, where the search space of the deformation process was constrained within the subspace spanned by principal modes. The local minima in the search space were removed effectively by the shape model, thus supporting an efficient binary search for the optimal solution. We evaluated the model by its efficacy in identifying bone voxels and excluding air regions. The model was tested across the 17 patients that have corresponding MR scans using a leave-one-out cross validation. A simple model using the first leading principal mode only was found to achieve reasonable accuracy, where an averaged 87% of bone voxels were correctly identified. Finally dilation of the optimally fit bone mask by 5 mm was found to cover 96% of bone voxels while minimally impacting the overlap with air (below 0.4%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26624989      PMCID: PMC4718197          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/1/169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  17 in total

1.  A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets.

Authors:  Andy Tsai; Anthony Yezzi; William Wells; Clare Tempany; Dewey Tucker; Ayres Fan; W Eric Grimson; Alan Willsky
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  T1/T2*-weighted MRI provides clinically relevant pseudo-CT density data for the pelvic bones in MRI-only based radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Mika Kapanen; Mikko Tenhunen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  MRI bone segmentation using deformable models and shape priors.

Authors:  Jérome Schmid; Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2008

4.  Modeling of the bony pelvis from MRI using a multi-atlas AE-SDM for registration and tracking in image-guided robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Qinquan Gao; Ping-Lin Chang; Daniel Rueckert; S Mohammed Ali; Daniel Cohen; Philip Pratt; Erik Mayer; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi; Philip Eddie Edwards
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  A dual model HU conversion from MRI intensity values within and outside of bone segment for MRI-based radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Juha Korhonen; Mika Kapanen; Jani Keyriläinen; Tiina Seppälä; Mikko Tenhunen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  An atlas-based electron density mapping method for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-alone treatment planning and adaptive MRI-based prostate radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jason A Dowling; Jonathan Lambert; Joel Parker; Olivier Salvado; Jurgen Fripp; Anne Capp; Chris Wratten; James W Denham; Peter B Greer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Investigation of a method for generating synthetic CT models from MRI scans of the head and neck for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Hsu; Yue Cao; Ke Huang; Mary Feng; James M Balter
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Comparison of segmentation-based attenuation correction methods for PET/MRI: evaluation of bone and liver standardized uptake value with oncologic PET/CT data.

Authors:  Joong Hyun Kim; Jae Sung Lee; In-Chan Song; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Statistical atlases of bone anatomy: construction, iterative improvement and validation.

Authors:  Gouthami Chintalapani; Lotta M Ellingsen; Ofri Sadowsky; Jerry L Prince; Russell H Taylor
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2007

10.  Magnetic resonance-based treatment planning for prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy: creation of digitally reconstructed radiographs.

Authors:  Lili Chen; Thai-Binh Nguyen; Elan Jones; Zuoqun Chen; Wei Luo; Lu Wang; Robert A Price; Alan Pollack; C-M Charlie Ma
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  MR-guided radiation therapy: transformative technology and its role in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Chia-Lin Tseng; James M Balter; Feifei Teng; Hemant A Parmar; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Emerging role of MRI in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hersh Chandarana; Hesheng Wang; R H N Tijssen; Indra J Das
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Dosimetric and workflow evaluation of first commercial synthetic CT software for clinical use in pelvis.

Authors:  Neelam Tyagi; Sandra Fontenla; Jing Zhang; Michelle Cloutier; Mo Kadbi; Jim Mechalakos; Michael Zelefsky; Joe Deasy; Margie Hunt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Hybrid ZTE/Dixon MR-based attenuation correction for quantitative uptake estimation of pelvic lesions in PET/MRI.

Authors:  Andrew P Leynes; Jaewon Yang; Dattesh D Shanbhag; Sandeep S Kaushik; Youngho Seo; Thomas A Hope; Florian Wiesinger; Peder E Z Larson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Synthetic CT for MRI-based liver stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Jeremy S Bredfeldt; Lianli Liu; Mary Feng; Yue Cao; James M Balter
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Female pelvic synthetic CT generation based on joint intensity and shape analysis.

Authors:  Lianli Liu; Shruti Jolly; Yue Cao; Karen Vineberg; Jeffrey A Fessler; James M Balter
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Benchmarking off-the-shelf statistical shape modeling tools in clinical applications.

Authors:  Anupama Goparaju; Krithika Iyer; Alexandre Bône; Nan Hu; Heath B Henninger; Andrew E Anderson; Stanley Durrleman; Matthijs Jacxsens; Alan Morris; Ibolya Csecs; Nassir Marrouche; Shireen Y Elhabian
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 8.  MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Peter B Greer; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Dosimetric evaluation of magnetic resonance-generated synthetic CT for radiation treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hesheng Wang; Kevin Du; Juliet Qu; Hersh Chandarana; Indra J Das
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT for magnetic resonance-only based radiotherapy planning of lung cancer.

Authors:  Hesheng Wang; Hersh Chandarana; Kai Tobias Block; Thomas Vahle; Matthias Fenchel; Indra J Das
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.481

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.