Literature DB >> 22330995

An atlas-based electron density mapping method for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-alone treatment planning and adaptive MRI-based prostate radiation therapy.

Jason A Dowling1, Jonathan Lambert, Joel Parker, Olivier Salvado, Jurgen Fripp, Anne Capp, Chris Wratten, James W Denham, Peter B Greer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prostate radiation therapy dose planning directly on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans would reduce costs and uncertainties due to multimodality image registration. Adaptive planning using a combined MRI-linear accelerator approach will also require dose calculations to be performed using MRI data. The aim of this work was to develop an atlas-based method to map realistic electron densities to MRI scans for dose calculations and digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) generation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Whole-pelvis MRI and CT scan data were collected from 39 prostate patients. Scans from 2 patients showed significantly different anatomy from that of the remaining patient population, and these patients were excluded. A whole-pelvis MRI atlas was generated based on the manually delineated MRI scans. In addition, a conjugate electron-density atlas was generated from the coregistered computed tomography (CT)-MRI scans. Pseudo-CT scans for each patient were automatically generated by global and nonrigid registration of the MRI atlas to the patient MRI scan, followed by application of the same transformations to the electron-density atlas. Comparisons were made between organ segmentations by using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and point dose calculations for 26 patients on planning CT and pseudo-CT scans.
RESULTS: The agreement between pseudo-CT and planning CT was quantified by differences in the point dose at isocenter and distance to agreement in corresponding voxels. Dose differences were found to be less than 2%. Chi-squared values indicated that the planning CT and pseudo-CT dose distributions were equivalent. No significant differences (p > 0.9) were found between CT and pseudo-CT Hounsfield units for organs of interest. Mean ± standard deviation DSC scores for the atlas-based segmentation of the pelvic bones were 0.79 ± 0.12, 0.70 ± 0.14 for the prostate, 0.64 ± 0.16 for the bladder, and 0.63 ± 0.16 for the rectum.
CONCLUSIONS: The electron-density atlas method provides the ability to automatically define organs and map realistic electron densities to MRI scans for radiotherapy dose planning and DRR generation. This method provides the necessary tools for MRI-alone treatment planning and adaptive MRI-based prostate radiation therapy. Crown
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22330995     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  76 in total

Review 1.  Individualized radiotherapy by combining high-end irradiation and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Stephanie E Combs; Fridtjof Nüsslin; Jan J Wilkens
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  mDixon-Based Synthetic CT Generation for PET Attenuation Correction on Abdomen and Pelvis Jointly Using Transfer Fuzzy Clustering and Active Learning-Based Classification.

Authors:  Pengjiang Qian; Yangyang Chen; Jung-Wen Kuo; Yu-Dong Zhang; Yizhang Jiang; Kaifa Zhao; Rose Al Helo; Harry Friel; Atallah Baydoun; Feifei Zhou; Jin Uk Heo; Norbert Avril; Karin Herrmann; Rodney Ellis; Bryan Traughber; Robert S Jones; Shitong Wang; Kuan-Hao Su; Raymond F Muzic
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  A Novel method to generate on-board 4D MRI using prior 4D MRI and on-board kV projections from a conventional LINAC for target localization in liver SBRT.

Authors:  Wendy Harris; Chunhao Wang; Fang-Fang Yin; Jing Cai; Lei Ren
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  MR image-based synthetic CT for IMRT prostate treatment planning and CBCT image-guided localization.

Authors:  Shupeng Chen; Hong Quan; An Qin; Seonghwan Yee; Di Yan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 5.  MRI in medical practice and its future use in radiation oncology. Resume of XXV GOCO Congress (Montpellier) 2017.

Authors:  Xavier Druet; Estrella Acosta Sanchez; Ken Soleakhena; Anne Laprie; Jordi Sáez; Stéphanie Nougaret; Olivier Riou; Elodie Rigal; Laura Kibranian; Miguel Palacios; Ismael Membrive
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-06-05

6.  New concept on an integrated interior magnetic resonance imaging and medical linear accelerator system for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Xun Jia; Zhen Tian; Yan Xi; Steve B Jiang; Ge Wang
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-02

Review 7.  MR-guided radiation therapy: transformative technology and its role in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Chia-Lin Tseng; James M Balter; Feifei Teng; Hemant A Parmar; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based pseudo computed tomography using anatomic signature and joint dictionary learning.

Authors:  Yang Lei; Hui-Kuo Shu; Sibo Tian; Jiwoong Jason Jeong; Tian Liu; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui Mao; Tonghe Wang; Ashesh B Jani; Walter J Curran; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-08-24

Review 9.  MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Peter B Greer; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Investigation of a method for generating synthetic CT models from MRI scans of the head and neck for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Hsu; Yue Cao; Ke Huang; Mary Feng; James M Balter
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.