Literature DB >> 24387496

A dual model HU conversion from MRI intensity values within and outside of bone segment for MRI-based radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer.

Juha Korhonen1, Mika Kapanen2, Jani Keyriläinen3, Tiina Seppälä3, Mikko Tenhunen3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The lack of electron density information in magnetic resonance images (MRI) poses a major challenge for MRI-based radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP). In this study the authors convert MRI intensity values into Hounsfield units (HUs) in the male pelvis and thus enable accurate MRI-based RTP for prostate cancer patients with varying tissue anatomy and body fat contents.
METHODS: T1/T2*-weighted MRI intensity values and standard computed tomography (CT) image HUs in the male pelvis were analyzed using image data of 10 prostate cancer patients. The collected data were utilized to generate a dual model HU conversion technique from MRI intensity values of the single image set separately within and outside of contoured pelvic bones. Within the bone segment local MRI intensity values were converted to HUs by applying a second-order polynomial model. This model was tuned for each patient by two patient-specific adjustments: MR signal normalization to correct shifts in absolute intensity level and application of a cutoff value to accurately represent low density bony tissue HUs. For soft tissues, such as fat and muscle, located outside of the bone contours, a threshold-based segmentation method without requirements for any patient-specific adjustments was introduced to convert MRI intensity values into HUs. The dual model HU conversion technique was implemented by constructing pseudo-CT images for 10 other prostate cancer patients. The feasibility of these images for RTP was evaluated by comparing HUs in the generated pseudo-CT images with those in standard CT images, and by determining deviations in MRI-based dose distributions compared to those in CT images with 7-field intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with the anisotropic analytical algorithm and 360° volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with the Voxel Monte Carlo algorithm.
RESULTS: The average HU differences between the constructed pseudo-CT images and standard CT images of each test patient ranged from -2 to 5 HUs and from 22 to 78 HUs in soft and bony tissues, respectively. The average local absolute value differences were 11 HUs in soft tissues and 99 HUs in bones. The planning target volume doses (volumes 95%, 50%, 5%) in the pseudo-CT images were within 0.8% compared to those in CT images in all of the 20 treatment plans. The average deviation was 0.3%. With all the test patients over 94% (IMRT) and 92% (VMAT) of dose points within body (lower than 10% of maximum dose suppressed) passed the 1 mm and 1% 2D gamma index criterion. The statistical tests (t- and F-tests) showed significantly improved (p ≤ 0.05) HU and dose calculation accuracies with the soft tissue conversion method instead of homogeneous representation of these tissues in MRI-based RTP images.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that it is possible to construct high quality pseudo-CT images by converting the intensity values of a single MRI series into HUs in the male pelvis, and to use these images for accurate MRI-based prostate RTP dose calculations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24387496     DOI: 10.1118/1.4842575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  49 in total

Review 1.  Individualized radiotherapy by combining high-end irradiation and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Stephanie E Combs; Fridtjof Nüsslin; Jan J Wilkens
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  MR image-based synthetic CT for IMRT prostate treatment planning and CBCT image-guided localization.

Authors:  Shupeng Chen; Hong Quan; An Qin; Seonghwan Yee; Di Yan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance image guidance in external beam radiation therapy planning and delivery.

Authors:  Ilamurugu Arivarasan; Chandrasekaran Anuradha; Shanmuga Subramanian; Ayyalusamy Anantharaman; Velayudham Ramasubramanian
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based pseudo computed tomography using anatomic signature and joint dictionary learning.

Authors:  Yang Lei; Hui-Kuo Shu; Sibo Tian; Jiwoong Jason Jeong; Tian Liu; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui Mao; Tonghe Wang; Ashesh B Jani; Walter J Curran; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-08-24

Review 5.  Emerging role of MRI in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hersh Chandarana; Hesheng Wang; R H N Tijssen; Indra J Das
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Dosimetric and workflow evaluation of first commercial synthetic CT software for clinical use in pelvis.

Authors:  Neelam Tyagi; Sandra Fontenla; Jing Zhang; Michelle Cloutier; Mo Kadbi; Jim Mechalakos; Michael Zelefsky; Joe Deasy; Margie Hunt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Effect of region extraction and assigned mass-density values on the accuracy of dose calculation with magnetic resonance-based volumetric arc therapy planning.

Authors:  Keisuke Usui; Keisuke Sasai; Koichi Ogawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-03-14

8.  MRI-based pseudo CT synthesis using anatomical signature and alternating random forest with iterative refinement model.

Authors:  Yang Lei; Jiwoong Jason Jeong; Tonghe Wang; Hui-Kuo Shu; Pretesh Patel; Sibo Tian; Tian Liu; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui Mao; Ashesh B Jani; Walter J Curran; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 9.  MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Peter B Greer; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Image Guided Radiation Therapy Using Synthetic Computed Tomography Images in Brain Cancer.

Authors:  Ryan G Price; Joshua P Kim; Weili Zheng; Indrin J Chetty; Carri Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.