Rashid L Bashshur1, Gary W Shannon2, Noura Bashshur1, Peter M Yellowlees3. 1. 1 University of Michigan Health System, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan. 2. 2 Department of Geography, University of Kentucky , Lexington, Kentucky. 3. 3 Department of Psychiatry, University of California Davis , Sacramento, California.
Abstract
PROBLEM AND OBJECTIVE: This research derives from the confluence of several factors, namely, the prevalence of a complex array of mental health issues across age, social, ethnic, and economic groups, an increasingly critical shortage of mental health professionals and the associated disability and productivity loss in the population, and the potential of telemental health (TMH) to ameliorate these problems. Definitive information regarding the true merit of telemedicine applications and intervention is now of paramount importance among policymakers, providers of care, researchers, payers, program developers, and the public at large. This is necessary for rational policymaking, prudent resource allocation decisions, and informed strategic planning. This article is aimed at assessing the state of scientific knowledge regarding the merit of telemedicine interventions in the treatment of mental disorders (TMH) in terms of feasibility/acceptance, effects on medication compliance, health outcomes, and cost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We started by casting a wide net to identify the relevant studies and to examine in detail the content of studies that met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. Only studies that met rigorous methodological criteria were included. Necessary details include the specific nature and content of the intervention, the research methodology, clinical focus, technological configuration, and the modality of the intervention. RESULTS: The published scientific literature on TMH reveals strong and consistent evidence of the feasibility of this modality of care and its acceptance by its intended users, as well as uniform indication of improvement in symptomology and quality of life among patients across a broad range of demographic and diagnostic groups. Similarly, positive trends are shown in terms of cost savings. CONCLUSION: There is substantial empirical evidence for supporting the use of telemedicine interventions in patients with mental disorders.
PROBLEM AND OBJECTIVE: This research derives from the confluence of several factors, namely, the prevalence of a complex array of mental health issues across age, social, ethnic, and economic groups, an increasingly critical shortage of mental health professionals and the associated disability and productivity loss in the population, and the potential of telemental health (TMH) to ameliorate these problems. Definitive information regarding the true merit of telemedicine applications and intervention is now of paramount importance among policymakers, providers of care, researchers, payers, program developers, and the public at large. This is necessary for rational policymaking, prudent resource allocation decisions, and informed strategic planning. This article is aimed at assessing the state of scientific knowledge regarding the merit of telemedicine interventions in the treatment of mental disorders (TMH) in terms of feasibility/acceptance, effects on medication compliance, health outcomes, and cost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We started by casting a wide net to identify the relevant studies and to examine in detail the content of studies that met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. Only studies that met rigorous methodological criteria were included. Necessary details include the specific nature and content of the intervention, the research methodology, clinical focus, technological configuration, and the modality of the intervention. RESULTS: The published scientific literature on TMH reveals strong and consistent evidence of the feasibility of this modality of care and its acceptance by its intended users, as well as uniform indication of improvement in symptomology and quality of life among patients across a broad range of demographic and diagnostic groups. Similarly, positive trends are shown in terms of cost savings. CONCLUSION: There is substantial empirical evidence for supporting the use of telemedicine interventions in patients with mental disorders.
Entities:
Keywords:
evidence; mental health disorders; telemedicine; telemental health; telepsychiatry
Authors: David C Mohr; Stacey L Hart; Laura Julian; Claudine Catledge; Lara Honos-Webb; Lea Vella; Edwin T Tasch Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-09
Authors: Mary J Baker-Ericzén; Cynthia D Connelly; Andrea L Hazen; Cecilia Dueñas; John A Landsverk; Sarah McCue Horwitz Journal: Fam Syst Health Date: 2012-06-18 Impact factor: 1.950
Authors: Bruce L Rollman; Bea Herbeck Belnap; Sati Mazumdar; Patricia R Houck; Fang Zhu; William Gardner; Charles F Reynolds; Herbert C Schulberg; M Katherine Shear Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-12
Authors: John S Cacciola; Amy C Camilleri; Deni Carise; Samuel H Rikoon; James R McKay; A Thomas McLellan; Cheryl Wilson; John T Schwarzlose Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Wayne J Katon; Michael Von Korff; Elizabeth H B Lin; Greg Simon; Evette Ludman; Joan Russo; Paul Ciechanowski; Edward Walker; Terry Bush Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2004-10
Authors: Timothy W Brearly; Robert D Shura; Sarah L Martindale; Rory A Lazowski; David D Luxton; Brian V Shenal; Jared A Rowland Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 7.444