BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that telephone-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy (T-CBT) is superior to forms of no treatment controls. No study has examined if the skills-training component to T-CBT provides any benefit beyond that provided by nonspecific factors. OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of a 16-week T-CBT against a strong control for attention and nonspecific therapy effects. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial including 12-month follow-up. SETTING:Telephone administration of psychotherapywith patients in their homes. PARTICIPANTS: Participants had depression and functional impairments due to multiple sclerosis. INTERVENTIONS: A 16-week T-CBT program was compared with 16 weeks of telephone-administered supportive emotion-focused therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder, Beck Depression Inventory score, and Positive Affect scale score of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. RESULTS: Of the 127 participants randomized, 7 (5.5%) dropped out of treatment. There were significant improvement during treatment on all outcome measures (P<.01 for all) and an increase in Positive Affect Scale score. Improvements over 16 weeks of treatment were significantly greater for T-CBT, compared with telephone-administered supportive emotion-focused therapy, for major depressive disorder frequency (P = .02), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (P = .02), and Positive Affect Scale score (P = .008), but not for the Beck Depression Inventory score (P = .29). Treatment gains were maintained during 12-month follow-up; however, differences across treatments were no longer evident (P > .16 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Patients showed significant improvements in depression and positive affect during the 16 weeks of telephone-administered treatment. The specific cognitive-behavioral components of T-CBT produced improvements above and beyond the nonspecific effects of telephone-administered supportive emotion-focused therapy on evaluator-rated measures of depression and self-reported positive affect. Attrition was low.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that telephone-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy (T-CBT) is superior to forms of no treatment controls. No study has examined if the skills-training component to T-CBT provides any benefit beyond that provided by nonspecific factors. OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of a 16-week T-CBT against a strong control for attention and nonspecific therapy effects. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial including 12-month follow-up. SETTING: Telephone administration of psychotherapy with patients in their homes. PARTICIPANTS: Participants had depression and functional impairments due to multiple sclerosis. INTERVENTIONS: A 16-week T-CBT program was compared with 16 weeks of telephone-administered supportive emotion-focused therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder, Beck Depression Inventory score, and Positive Affect scale score of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. RESULTS: Of the 127 participants randomized, 7 (5.5%) dropped out of treatment. There were significant improvement during treatment on all outcome measures (P<.01 for all) and an increase in Positive Affect Scale score. Improvements over 16 weeks of treatment were significantly greater for T-CBT, compared with telephone-administered supportive emotion-focused therapy, for major depressive disorder frequency (P = .02), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (P = .02), and Positive Affect Scale score (P = .008), but not for the Beck Depression Inventory score (P = .29). Treatment gains were maintained during 12-month follow-up; however, differences across treatments were no longer evident (P > .16 for all). CONCLUSIONS:Patients showed significant improvements in depression and positive affect during the 16 weeks of telephone-administered treatment. The specific cognitive-behavioral components of T-CBT produced improvements above and beyond the nonspecific effects of telephone-administered supportive emotion-focused therapy on evaluator-rated measures of depression and self-reported positive affect. Attrition was low.
Authors: Michelle D Vaughan; Joshua N Hook; J Nile Wagley; Don Davis; Christina Hill; Bankole A Johnson; J Kim Penberthy Journal: Addict Disord Their Treat Date: 2012-03
Authors: John C Fortney; Jeffrey M Pyne; Mark J Edlund; David K Williams; Dean E Robinson; Dinesh Mittal; Kathy L Henderson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-05-10 Impact factor: 5.128