Mohammad Reza Mahmoodi1, Mohammad Reza Baneshi2, Azam Rastegari2. 1. Cardiovascular Research Center & Nutrition Department, School of Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences. Haft Bagh-E-Alavi Highway, Kerman, Iran. 2. Research Center for Modeling in Health, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to predict occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI) by means of a classification and regression tree (CART) model by conventional risk factors in middle-aged versus elderly (age ⩾65years) diabetic and nondiabetic patients from the Modares Heart Study. METHOD: A total of 469 patients were randomly selected and categorized into two groups according to clinical diabetes status. Group I consisted of 238 diabetic patients and group II consisted of 231 nondiabetic patients. Our population was MI positive. The outcome investigated was diabetes mellitus. We used a decision-analytic model to predict the diagnosis of patients with suspected MI. RESULTS: We constructed 4 predictive patterns using 12 input variables and 1 output variable in terms of their sensitivity, specificity and risk. The differences among patterns were due to inclusion of predictor variables. The CART model suggested different variables of hypertension, mean cell volume, fasting blood sugar, cholesterol, triglyceride and uric acid concentration based on middle-aged and elderly patients at high risk for MI. Levels of biochemical measurements identified as best risk cutoff points. In evaluating the precision of different patterns, sensitivity and specificity were 47.9-84.0% and 56.3-93.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CART model is capable of symbolizing interpretable clinical data for confirming and better prediction of MI occurrence in clinic or in hospital. Therefore, predictor variables in pattern could affect the outcome based on age group variable. Hyperglycemia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and hyperuricemia were serious predictors for occurrence of MI in diabetics.
BACKGROUND: We sought to predict occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI) by means of a classification and regression tree (CART) model by conventional risk factors in middle-aged versus elderly (age ⩾65years) diabetic and nondiabeticpatients from the Modares Heart Study. METHOD: A total of 469 patients were randomly selected and categorized into two groups according to clinical diabetes status. Group I consisted of 238 diabeticpatients and group II consisted of 231 nondiabeticpatients. Our population was MI positive. The outcome investigated was diabetes mellitus. We used a decision-analytic model to predict the diagnosis of patients with suspected MI. RESULTS: We constructed 4 predictive patterns using 12 input variables and 1 output variable in terms of their sensitivity, specificity and risk. The differences among patterns were due to inclusion of predictor variables. The CART model suggested different variables of hypertension, mean cell volume, fasting blood sugar, cholesterol, triglyceride and uric acid concentration based on middle-aged and elderly patients at high risk for MI. Levels of biochemical measurements identified as best risk cutoff points. In evaluating the precision of different patterns, sensitivity and specificity were 47.9-84.0% and 56.3-93.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CART model is capable of symbolizing interpretable clinical data for confirming and better prediction of MI occurrence in clinic or in hospital. Therefore, predictor variables in pattern could affect the outcome based on age group variable. Hyperglycemia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and hyperuricemia were serious predictors for occurrence of MI in diabetics.
Entities:
Keywords:
classification and regression tree model; diabetic; elderly; middle-aged; myocardial infarction; nondiabetic
Authors: Donna K Arnett; Paul G McGovern; David R Jacobs; Eyal Shahar; Sue Duval; Henry Blackburn; Russell V Luepker Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-11-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Michiel J Bos; Peter J Koudstaal; Albert Hofman; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-05-04 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Sean M Donahoe; Garrick C Stewart; Carolyn H McCabe; Satishkumar Mohanavelu; Sabina A Murphy; Christopher P Cannon; Elliott M Antman Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-08-15 Impact factor: 56.272