Literature DB >> 7497751

A decision tree for the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in nontraumatic chest pain patients at hospital admission.

J Mair1, J Smidt, P Lechleitner, F Dienstl, B Puschendorf.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To find an accurate algorithm for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in nontraumatic chest pain patients on presentation to the emergency department.
DESIGN: In a prospective clinical study, we compared the diagnostic performances of clinical symptoms, presenting ECG, creatinine kinase, creatine kinase MB activity and mass concentration, myoglobin, and cardiac troponin T test results of hospital admission blood samples. By classification and regression trees, a decision tree for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was developed.
SETTING: Emergency room of a Department of Internal Medicine (University Hospital). PATIENTS: One hundred fourteen nontraumatic chest pain patients (median delay from onset of chest pain to hospital admission, 3 h; range, 0.33 to 22): 26 Q-wave and 19 non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions, 49 patients with unstable angina pectoris, and 20 patients with chest pain caused by other diseases. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Of each parameter taken by itself, the ECG was tendentiously most informative (areas under receiver operating characteristic plots: 0.87 +/- 0.04 [ECG], 0.80 +/- 0.08 [myoglobin], 0.80 +/- 0.04 [creatine kinase MB mass], 0.77 +/- 0.04 [creatine kinase activity], 0.69 +/- 0.06 [clinical symptoms] 0.67 +/- 0.06 [creatine kinase MB activity], 0.67 +/- 0.05 [troponin T]). In patients presenting 3 h or less after the onset of chest pain, ECG signs of acute transmural myocardial ischemia were the best discriminator between patients with and without myocardial infarction. In patients presenting more than 3 h, however, creatine kinase MB mass concentrations (discriminator value, 6.7 micrograms/L) were superior to the ECG, clinical symptoms, and all other biochemical markers tested. This algorithm for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction was superior to each parameter by itself and was characterized by 0.91 sensitivity, a 0.90 specificity, a 0.90 positive and negative predictive value, and a 0.90 efficiency.
CONCLUSIONS: We found an algorithm that could accurately separate the myocardial infarction patients from the others on admission to the emergency department. Therefore, this classifier could be a valuable diagnostic aid for rapid confirmation of a suspected myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7497751     DOI: 10.1378/chest.108.6.1502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  13 in total

1.  AMI screening using linguistic fuzzy rules.

Authors:  Raja Noor Ainon; Awang M Bulgiba; Adel Lahsasna
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Subpopulations of older foster youths with differential risk of diagnosis for alcohol abuse or dependence.

Authors:  Thomas E Keller; Jennifer E Blakeslee; Stephenie C Lemon; Mark E Courtney
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 3.  Glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB in diagnosis of myocardial ischaemic injury and infarction.

Authors:  E G Krause; G Rabitzsch; F Noll; J Mair; B Puschendorf
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.396

4.  An introduction to tree-structured modeling with application to quality of life data.

Authors:  Xiaogang Su; Andres Azuero; June Cho; Elizabeth Kvale; Karen M Meneses; M Patrick McNees
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Comparison of conventional risk factors in middle-aged versus elderly diabetic and nondiabetic patients with myocardial infarction: prediction with decision-analytic model.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Mahmoodi; Mohammad Reza Baneshi; Azam Rastegari
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.565

6.  Management strategies for patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  Maame Yaa A B Yiadom; Joshua M Kosowsky
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-02

Review 7.  A Review of Automated Methods for Detection of Myocardial Ischemia and Infarction Using Electrocardiogram and Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Sardar Ansari; Negar Farzaneh; Marlena Duda; Kelsey Horan; Hedvig B Andersson; Zachary D Goldberger; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Kayvan Najarian
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-10-16

8.  A simple statistical model for prediction of acute coronary syndrome in chest pain patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jonas Björk; Jakob L Forberg; Mattias Ohlsson; Lars Edenbrandt; Hans Ohlin; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Clinical parameters predicting failure of empirical antibacterial therapy in early onset neonatal sepsis, identified by classification and regression tree analysis.

Authors:  Tuuli Metsvaht; Heti Pisarev; Mari-Liis Ilmoja; Ulle Parm; Lea Maipuu; Mirjam Merila; Piia Müürsepp; Irja Lutsar
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology.

Authors:  Erik P Hess; George A Wells; Allan Jaffe; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2008-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.