Literature DB >> 26617264

Impaired acquisition of new words after left temporal lobectomy despite normal fast-mapping behavior.

David E Warren1, Daniel Tranel2, Melissa C Duff3.   

Abstract

Word learning has been proposed to rely on unique brain regions including the temporal lobes, and the left temporal lobe appears to be especially important. In order to investigate the role of the left temporal lobe in word learning under different conditions, we tested whether patients with left temporal lobectomies (N=6) could learn novel words using two distinct formats. Previous research has shown that word learning in contrastive fast mapping conditions may rely on different neural substrates than explicit encoding conditions (Sharon et al., 2011). In the current investigation, we used a previously reported word learning task that implemented two distinct study formats (Warren and Duff, 2014): a contrastive fast mapping condition in which a picture of a novel item was displayed beside a picture of a familiar item while the novel item's name was presented aurally ("Click on the numbat."); and an explicit encoding (i.e., control) condition in which a picture of a novel item was displayed while its name was presented aurally ("This is a numbat."). After a delay, learning of the novel words was evaluated with memory tests including three-alternative forced-choice recognition, free recall, cued recall, and familiarity ratings. During the fast-mapping study condition both the left temporal lobectomy and healthy comparison groups performed well, but at test only the comparison group showed evidence of novel word learning. Our findings indicate that unilateral resection of the left temporal lobe including the hippocampus and temporal pole can severely impair word learning, and that fast-mapping study conditions do not promote subsequent word learning in temporal lobectomy populations.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hippocampus; Language; Left temporal lobe; Memory; Unilateral temporal lobectomy; Word learning

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26617264      PMCID: PMC4698347          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  47 in total

1.  A role for left temporal pole in the retrieval of words for unique entities.

Authors:  T J Grabowski; H Damasio; D Tranel; L L Ponto; R D Hichwa; A R Damasio
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions.

Authors:  W B SCOVILLE; B MILNER
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1957-02       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Memory outcome after selective amygdalohippocampectomy in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Ulrike Gleissner; Christoph Helmstaedter; Johannes Schramm; Christian E Elger
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.864

4.  Dissociated verbal and nonverbal retrieval and learning following left anterior temporal damage.

Authors:  D Tranel
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 5.  A unified framework for the functional organization of the medial temporal lobes and the phenomenology of episodic memory.

Authors:  Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Word learning in 6-month-olds: fast encoding-weak retention.

Authors:  Manuela Friedrich; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Not so fast: hippocampal amnesia slows word learning despite successful fast mapping.

Authors:  David E Warren; Melissa C Duff
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 8.  Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age?

Authors:  Chris Rorden; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 9.  The medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; Craig E L Stark; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Fast mapping rapidly integrates information into existing memory networks.

Authors:  Marc N Coutanche; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-09-15
View more
  7 in total

1.  Fast mappers, slow learners: Word learning without hippocampus is slow and sparse irrespective of methodology.

Authors:  David E Warren; Melissa C Duff
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.065

2.  Dissociating action and abstract verb comprehension post-stroke.

Authors:  Nicholas Riccardi; Grigori Yourganov; Chris Rorden; Julius Fridriksson; Rutvik H Desai
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Small Sets of Novel Words Are Fully Retained After 1-Week in Typically Developing Children and Down Syndrome: A Fast Mapping Study.

Authors:  Stella Sakhon; Kelly Edwards; Alison Luongo; Melanie Murphy; Jamie Edgin
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Fast Mapping of Novel Words in the Adult Brain.

Authors:  Marina J Vasilyeva; Veronika M Knyazeva; Aleksander A Aleksandrov; Yury Shtyrov
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Rapid acquisition through fast mapping: stable memory over time and role of prior knowledge.

Authors:  Cuihong Li; Zhongyu Hu; Jiongjiong Yang
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Cross-Situational Statistical Learning of New Words Despite Bilateral Hippocampal Damage and Severe Amnesia.

Authors:  David E Warren; Tanja C Roembke; Natalie V Covington; Bob McMurray; Melissa C Duff
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Little evidence for Fast Mapping (FM) in adults: A review and discussion.

Authors:  Elisa Cooper; Andrea Greve; Richard N Henson
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.065

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.