Literature DB >> 26615981

Degeneracy in model parameter estimation for multi-compartmental diffusion in neuronal tissue.

Ileana O Jelescu1, Jelle Veraart1, Els Fieremans1, Dmitry S Novikov1.   

Abstract

The ultimate promise of diffusion MRI (dMRI) models is specificity to neuronal microstructure, which may lead to distinct clinical biomarkers using noninvasive imaging. While multi-compartment models are a common approach to interpret water diffusion in the brain in vivo, the estimation of their parameters from the dMRI signal remains an unresolved problem. Practically, even when q space is highly oversampled, nonlinear fit outputs suffer from heavy bias and poor precision. So far, this has been alleviated by fixing some of the model parameters to a priori values, for improved precision at the expense of accuracy. Here we use a representative two-compartment model to show that fitting fails to determine the five model parameters from over 60 measurement points. For the first time, we identify the reasons for this poor performance. The first reason is the existence of two local minima in the parameter space for the objective function of the fitting procedure. These minima correspond to qualitatively different sets of parameters, yet they both lie within biophysically plausible ranges. We show that, at realistic signal-to-noise ratio values, choosing between the two minima based on the associated objective function values is essentially impossible. Second, there is an ensemble of very low objective function values around each of these minima in the form of a pipe. The existence of such a direction in parameter space, along which the objective function profile is very flat, explains the bias and large uncertainty in parameter estimation, and the spurious parameter correlations: in the presence of noise, the minimum can be randomly displaced by a very large amount along each pipe. Our results suggest that the biophysical interpretation of dMRI model parameters crucially depends on establishing which of the minima is closer to the biophysical reality and the size of the uncertainty associated with each parameter.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biophysical mechanisms of MR diffusion; high order diffusion MR methods; microstructure; modeling; normal brain; parameter estimation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26615981      PMCID: PMC4920129          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  56 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion tensor imaging and aging - a review.

Authors:  Michael Moseley
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Oscillating gradient measurements of water diffusion in normal and globally ischemic rat brain.

Authors:  Mark D Does; Edward C Parsons; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Is the "biexponential diffusion" biexponential?

Authors:  Valerij G Kiselev; Kamil A Il'yasov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  An analytical model of restricted diffusion in bovine optic nerve.

Authors:  G J Stanisz; A Szafer; G A Wright; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  N-acetyl-aspartate levels correlate with intra-axonal compartment parameters from diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Elan J Grossman; Ivan I Kirov; Oded Gonen; Dmitry S Novikov; Matthew S Davitz; Yvonne W Lui; Robert I Grossman; Matilde Inglese; Els Fieremans
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Extracellular space diffusion in central nervous system: anisotropic diffusion measured by elliptical surface photobleaching.

Authors:  Marios C Papadopoulos; Jung Kyung Kim; A S Verkman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Compartmental study of diffusion and relaxation measured in vivo in normal and ischemic rat brain and trigeminal nerve.

Authors:  M D Does; J C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  In vivo magnetic resonance diffusion measurement in the brain of patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  H B Larsson; C Thomsen; J Frederiksen; M Stubgaard; O Henriksen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Evaluation of extra- and intracellular apparent diffusion in normal and globally ischemic rat brain via 19F NMR.

Authors:  T Q Duong; J J Ackerman; H S Ying; J J Neil
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Quantification of anisotropy and fiber orientation in human brain histological sections.

Authors:  Matthew D Budde; Jacopo Annese
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-01
View more
  95 in total

1.  In vivo quantification of demyelination and recovery using compartment-specific diffusion MRI metrics validated by electron microscopy.

Authors:  Ileana O Jelescu; Magdalena Zurek; Kerryanne V Winters; Jelle Veraart; Anjali Rajaratnam; Nathanael S Kim; James S Babb; Timothy M Shepherd; Dmitry S Novikov; Sungheon G Kim; Els Fieremans
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Evaluating kurtosis-based diffusion MRI tissue models for white matter with fiber ball imaging.

Authors:  Jens H Jensen; Emilie T McKinnon; G Russell Glenn; Joseph A Helpern
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Population-based Bayesian regularization for microstructural diffusion MRI with NODDIDA.

Authors:  Meghdoot Mozumder; Jose M Pozo; Santiago Coelho; Alejandro F Frangi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-05-26       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Using diffusion anisotropy to study cerebral cortical gray matter development.

Authors:  Christopher D Kroenke
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Assessing the validity of the approximation of diffusion-weighted-MRI signals from crossing fascicles by sums of signals from single fascicles.

Authors:  Gaëtan Rensonnet; Benoît Scherrer; Simon K Warfield; Benoît Macq; Maxime Taquet
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  High-gradient diffusion MRI reveals distinct estimates of axon diameter index within different white matter tracts in the in vivo human brain.

Authors:  Susie Y Huang; Qiyuan Tian; Qiuyun Fan; Thomas Witzel; Barbara Wichtmann; Jennifer A McNab; J Daniel Bireley; Natalya Machado; Eric C Klawiter; Choukri Mekkaoui; Lawrence L Wald; Aapo Nummenmaa
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 3.270

7.  Design and validation of diffusion MRI models of white matter.

Authors:  Ileana O Jelescu; Matthew D Budde
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2017-11-28

8.  Rotationally-invariant mapping of scalar and orientational metrics of neuronal microstructure with diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Dmitry S Novikov; Jelle Veraart; Ileana O Jelescu; Els Fieremans
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory.

Authors:  Jelle Veraart; Dmitry S Novikov; Daan Christiaens; Benjamin Ades-Aron; Jan Sijbers; Els Fieremans
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Towards microstructure fingerprinting: Estimation of tissue properties from a dictionary of Monte Carlo diffusion MRI simulations.

Authors:  Gaëtan Rensonnet; Benoît Scherrer; Gabriel Girard; Aleksandar Jankovski; Simon K Warfield; Benoît Macq; Jean-Philippe Thiran; Maxime Taquet
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.