Gaëtan Rensonnet1, Benoît Scherrer2, Simon K Warfield2, Benoît Macq1, Maxime Taquet1,2. 1. ICTEAM Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. 2. Computational Radiology Laboratory, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the validity of the superposition approximation for crossing fascicles, i.e., the assumption that the total diffusion-weighted MRI signal is the sum of the signals arising from each fascicle independently, even when the fascicles intermingle in a voxel. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations were used to study the impact of the approximation on the diffusion-weighted MRI signal and to assess whether this approximate model allows microstructural features of interwoven fascicles to be accurately estimated, despite signal differences. RESULTS: Small normalized signal differences were observed, typically 10-3-10-2. The use of the approximation had little impact on the estimation of the crossing angle, the axonal density index, and the radius index in clinically realistic scenarios wherein the acquisition noise was the predominant source of errors. In the absence of noise, large systematic errors due to the superposition approximation only persisted for the radius index, mainly driven by a low sensitivity of diffusion-weighted MRI signals to small radii in general. CONCLUSION: The use of the superposition approximation rather than a model of interwoven fascicles does not adversely impact the estimation of microstructural features of interwoven fascicles in most current clinical settings. Magn Reson Med 79:2332-2345, 2018.
PURPOSE: To assess the validity of the superposition approximation for crossing fascicles, i.e., the assumption that the total diffusion-weighted MRI signal is the sum of the signals arising from each fascicle independently, even when the fascicles intermingle in a voxel. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations were used to study the impact of the approximation on the diffusion-weighted MRI signal and to assess whether this approximate model allows microstructural features of interwoven fascicles to be accurately estimated, despite signal differences. RESULTS: Small normalized signal differences were observed, typically 10-3-10-2. The use of the approximation had little impact on the estimation of the crossing angle, the axonal density index, and the radius index in clinically realistic scenarios wherein the acquisition noise was the predominant source of errors. In the absence of noise, large systematic errors due to the superposition approximation only persisted for the radius index, mainly driven by a low sensitivity of diffusion-weighted MRI signals to small radii in general. CONCLUSION: The use of the superposition approximation rather than a model of interwoven fascicles does not adversely impact the estimation of microstructural features of interwoven fascicles in most current clinical settings. Magn Reson Med 79:2332-2345, 2018.
Authors: David S Tuch; Timothy G Reese; Mette R Wiegell; Nikos Makris; John W Belliveau; Van J Wedeen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Benoit Scherrer; Armin Schwartzman; Maxime Taquet; Mustafa Sahin; Sanjay P Prabhu; Simon K Warfield Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-09-12 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Maxime Taquet; Benoit Scherrer; Nicolas Boumal; Jurriaan M Peters; Benoit Macq; Simon K Warfield Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Gaëtan Rensonnet; Benoît Scherrer; Gabriel Girard; Aleksandar Jankovski; Simon K Warfield; Benoît Macq; Jean-Philippe Thiran; Maxime Taquet Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-09-30 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jonathan Rafael-Patino; David Romascano; Alonso Ramirez-Manzanares; Erick Jorge Canales-Rodríguez; Gabriel Girard; Jean-Philippe Thiran Journal: Front Neuroinform Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 4.081