Literature DB >> 26614526

Sutureless aortic valve replacement with Perceval bioprosthesis: are there predicting factors for postoperative pacemaker implantation?

Ferdinand Vogt1, Steffen Pfeiffer1, Angelo Maria Dell'Aquila2, Theodor Fischlein1, Giuseppe Santarpino3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) with sutureless bioprostheses has become an alternative to conventional AVR for patients with intermediate to high operative risk. However, this technique is associated with an increased risk of postoperative conduction disorders.
METHODS: We analysed 258 patients who underwent AVR with the Perceval prosthesis from July 2010 to September 2014 at our centre. Electrocardiography were obtained at baseline to record preoperatively the presence of conduction disorders. Preoperative risk factors, intraoperative procedures and complications (61 variables) were compared between patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM group) and without (no-PPM group) need for postoperative PPM implantation.
RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-nine patients underwent isolated AVR with the Perceval bioprosthesis, 89 patients had associated surgery and 23 patients underwent redo operations. The mean age was 77.7 ± 5 years, 139 patients were female (46%) and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 13.2 ± 11%. At baseline, 8 patients had already an implanted pacemaker. Postoperatively, 27 patients (10.5%) required new PPM implantation due to complete atrioventricular block. On univariate analysis, age (PPM vs no-PPM group: 80 ± 5 vs 77 ± 5 years, P = 0.009) and preoperative presence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) [overall n = 20 (7.8%); PPM vs no-PPM group: 9 vs 11 (33 vs 4.8%); P < 0.001] were identified as independent predictors of postoperative conduction disorders, but only pre-existing RBBB persisted on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 11.3-C-statistic 0.74, error estimate 0.064, confidence interval 0.672-0.801; P = 0.0002). Among patients undergoing sutureless AVR, the rate of PPM implantation was high.
CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the data collected made it possible to identify preoperatively a subset of patients undergoing sutureless AVR at higher risk of postoperative atrioventricular block. Additional surgical precautions should be implemented to prevent the occurrence of conduction disorders after sutureless AVR.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrophysiology; Heart valve prosthesis; Pacemaker

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26614526      PMCID: PMC4986555          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivv330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  24 in total

1.  Perceval S aortic valve implantation in mini-invasive surgery: the simple sutureless solution.

Authors:  Giuseppe Santarpino; Steffen Pfeiffer; Giovanni Concistrè; Theodor Fischlein
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-05-22

2.  Early and intermediate outcome after aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: Results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  Antonino S Rubino; Giuseppe Santarpino; Herbert De Praetere; Keiichiro Kasama; Magnus Dalén; Ulrik Sartipy; Jarmo Lahtinen; Jouni Heikkinen; Wanda Deste; Francesco Pollari; Peter Svenarud; Bart Meuris; Theodor Fischlein; Carmelo Mignosa; Fausto Biancari
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Executive Summary--a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Pacemaker Implantation).

Authors:  G Gregoratos; M D Cheitlin; A Conill; A E Epstein; C Fellows; T B Ferguson; R A Freedman; M A Hlatky; G V Naccarelli; S Saksena; R C Schlant; M J Silka
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-04-07       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with Perceval S sutureless valve: early outcomes and one-year survival from two European centers.

Authors:  Antonio Miceli; Giuseppe Santarpino; Steffen Pfeiffer; Michele Murzi; Daniyar Gilmanov; Giovanni Concistré; Eugenio Quaini; Marco Solinas; Theodor Fischlein; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Should sutureless aortic valve replacement be preferred only for decreasing aortic crossclamp time?

Authors:  Murat Tavlasoglu; Adem Guler; Fahri Gurkan Yesil
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Postoperative conduction disorders after implantation of the self-expandable sutureless Perceval S bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Astrid G M van Boxtel; Patrick Houthuizen; Mohamed A Soliman Hamad; Jelena Sjatskig; Erwin Tan; Frits W Prinzen; Albert H M van Straten
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2014-05

7.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement: a Canadian multicentre study.

Authors:  Amine Mazine; Kevin Teoh; Ismail Bouhout; Gopal Bhatnagar; Marc Pelletier; Pierre Voisine; Philippe Demers; Michel Carrier; Denis Bouchard
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Effect of sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis on intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  Willem Flameng; Marie-Christine Herregods; Hadewich Hermans; Gerry Van der Mieren; Monique Vercalsteren; Gert Poortmans; Jan Van Hemelrijck; Bart Meuris
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Sutureless replacement versus transcatheter valve implantation in aortic valve stenosis: a propensity-matched analysis of 2 strategies in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Giuseppe Santarpino; Steffen Pfeiffer; Jürgen Jessl; Angelo Maria Dell'Aquila; Francesco Pollari; Matthias Pauschinger; Theodor Fischlein
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Natural history of "high-risk" bundle-branch block: final report of a prospective study.

Authors:  J H McAnulty; S H Rahimtoola; E Murphy; H DeMots; L Ritzmann; P E Kanarek; S Kauffman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  11 in total

1.  eComment. The importance of choosing a proper predictor variable selection method in logistic regression analyses.

Authors:  Ugur Kucuk; Hilal Olgun Kucuk; Mehmet Eyuboglu; Mehmet Dogan
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-03

2.  Minimally Invasive Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement With the Perceval S Bioprosthesis Through Ministernotomy: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Krishan Ramsaransing; Vikash Hindori; Athiná Kougioumtzoglou; Abdullah Kaya; Eva Verbeek
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-10-28

Review 3.  Ten-year experience with the Perceval S sutureless prosthesis: lessons learned and future perspectives.

Authors:  Vincent Chauvette; Amine Mazine; Denis Bouchard
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-05-03

4.  Aortic valve replacement using stented or sutureless/rapid deployment prosthesis via either full-sternotomy or a minimally invasive approach: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kei Woldendorp; Mathew P Doyle; Paul G Bannon; Martin Misfeld; Tristan D Yan; Giuseppe Santarpino; Paolo Berretta; Marco Di Eusanio; Bart Meuris; Alfredo Giuseppe Cerillo; Pierluigi Stefàno; Niccolò Marchionni; Jacqueline K Olive; Tom C Nguyen; Marco Solinas; Giacomo Bianchi
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-09

5.  Avoiding oversizing in sutureless valves leads to lower transvalvular gradients and less permanent pacemaker implants postoperatively.

Authors:  Delphine Szecel; Marie Lamberigts; Filip Rega; Peter Verbrugghe; Christophe Dubois; Bart Meuris
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-07-09

6.  Recent improvement in operative techniques lead to lower pacemaker rate after Perceval implant.

Authors:  Olivier Fabre; Mihai Radutoiu; Ionut Carjaliu; Olivier Rebet; Laurence Gautier; Ilir Hysi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-07-09

7.  Surgical technique modifies the postoperative atrioventricular block rate in sutureless prostheses.

Authors:  Miguel González Barbeito; Francisco Estévez-Cid; Patricia Pardo Martínez; Carlos Velasco García de Sierra; Carmen Iglesias Gil; Cristina Quiñones Laguillo; José Joaquín Cuenca Castillo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Transcatheter, sutureless and conventional aortic-valve replacement: a network meta-analysis of 16,432 patients.

Authors:  Declan Lloyd; Jessica G Y Luc; Ben Elias Indja; Vannessa Leung; Nelson Wang; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Recovery of conduction disorders after sutureless aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Ka Yan Lam; Naomi Timmermans; Ferdi Akca; Erwin Tan; Niels J Verberkmoes; Kim de Kort; Mohamed Soliman-Hamad; Albert H M van Straten
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-05-10

10.  Need for permanent pacemaker implantation following implantation of the rapid deployment valve in combined procedures: a single centre cohort study.

Authors:  Oliver Deutsch; Isabell Deisenhofer; Katharina Koch-Buettner; Rüdiger Lange; Markus Krane
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.