Literature DB >> 22036184

Optic flow cues guide flight in birds.

Partha S Bhagavatula1, Charles Claudianos, Michael R Ibbotson, Mandyam V Srinivasan.   

Abstract

Although considerable effort has been devoted to investigating how birds migrate over large distances, surprisingly little is known about how they tackle so successfully the moment-to-moment challenges of rapid flight through cluttered environments [1]. It has been suggested that birds detect and avoid obstacles [2] and control landing maneuvers [3-5] by using cues derived from the image motion that is generated in the eyes during flight. Here we investigate the ability of budgerigars to fly through narrow passages in a collision-free manner, by filming their trajectories during flight in a corridor where the walls are decorated with various visual patterns. The results demonstrate, unequivocally and for the first time, that birds negotiate narrow gaps safely by balancing the speeds of image motion that are experienced by the two eyes and that the speed of flight is regulated by monitoring the speed of image motion that is experienced by the two eyes. These findings have close parallels with those previously reported for flying insects [6-13], suggesting that some principles of visual guidance may be shared by all diurnal, flying animals. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22036184     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  35 in total

1.  Bumblebee flight performance in environments of different proximity.

Authors:  Nellie Linander; Emily Baird; Marie Dacke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Hummingbirds control hovering flight by stabilizing visual motion.

Authors:  Benjamin Goller; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Pigeons trade efficiency for stability in response to level of challenge during confined flight.

Authors:  C David Williams; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Self-motion processing in visual and entorhinal cortices: inputs, integration, and implications for position coding.

Authors:  Malcolm G Campbell; Lisa M Giocomo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Through the eyes of a bird: modelling visually guided obstacle flight.

Authors:  Huai-Ti Lin; Ivo G Ros; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Finding the gap: a brightness-based strategy for guidance in cluttered environments.

Authors:  Emily Baird; Marie Dacke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Visual guidance of forward flight in hummingbirds reveals control based on image features instead of pattern velocity.

Authors:  Roslyn Dakin; Tyee K Fellows; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Comparative analysis of vestibular ecomorphology in birds.

Authors:  Roger B J Benson; Ethan Starmer-Jones; Roger A Close; Stig A Walsh
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Falcons pursue prey using visual motion cues: new perspectives from animal-borne cameras.

Authors:  Suzanne Amador Kane; Marjon Zamani
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Control of self-motion in dynamic fluids: fish do it differently from bees.

Authors:  Christine Scholtyssek; Marie Dacke; Ronald Kröger; Emily Baird
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.