Literature DB >> 26613985

Outcome at 2 Years after Dextrose Gel Treatment for Neonatal Hypoglycemia: Follow-Up of a Randomized Trial.

Deborah L Harris1, Jane M Alsweiler2, Judith M Ansell2, Gregory D Gamble2, Benjamin Thompson3, Trecia A Wouldes4, Tzu-Ying Yu3, Jane E Harding5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years' corrected age in children randomized to treatment with dextrose gel or placebo for hypoglycemia soon after birth (The Sugar Babies Study). STUDY
DESIGN: This was a follow-up study of 184 children with hypoglycemia (<2.6 mM [47 mg/dL]) in the first 48 hours and randomized to either dextrose (90/118, 76%) or placebo gel (94/119, 79%). Assessments were performed at Kahikatea House, Hamilton, New Zealand, and included neurologic function and general health (pediatrician assessed), cognitive, language, behavior, and motor skills (Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition), executive function (clinical assessment and Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool Edition), and vision (clinical examination and global motion perception). Coprimary outcomes were neurosensory impairment (cognitive, language or motor score below -1 SD or cerebral palsy or blind or deaf) and processing difficulty (executive function or global motion perception worse than 1.5 SD from the mean). Statistical tests were two sided with 5% significance level.
RESULTS: Mean (± SD) birth weight was 3093 ± 803 g and mean gestation was 37.7 ± 1.6 weeks. Sixty-six children (36%) had neurosensory impairment (1 severe, 6 moderate, 59 mild) with similar rates in both groups (dextrose 38% vs placebo 34%, relative risk 1.11, 95% CI 0.75-1.63). Processing difficulty also was similar between groups (dextrose 10% vs placebo 18%, relative risk 0.52, 95% CI 0.23-1.15).
CONCLUSIONS: Dextrose gel is safe for the treatment of neonatal hypoglycemia, but neurosensory impairment is common among these children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN 12608000623392.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26613985      PMCID: PMC4769950          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.10.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  29 in total

1.  Brain areas sensitive to coherent visual motion.

Authors:  O J Braddick; J M O'Brien; J Wattam-Bell; J Atkinson; T Hartley; R Turner
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 2.  Brain imaging of the central executive component of working memory.

Authors:  Fabienne Collette; Martial Van der Linden
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia in babies identified as at risk.

Authors:  Deborah L Harris; Philip J Weston; Jane E Harding
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 4.  Neurodevelopmental delay in small babies at term: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Arcangeli; B Thilaganathan; R Hooper; K S Khan; A Bhide
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Revisiting Transitional Hypoglycemia: Only Time Will Tell.

Authors:  Christopher J D McKinlay; Jane E Harding
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 16.193

6.  Dextrose gel for neonatal hypoglycaemia (the Sugar Babies Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Deborah L Harris; Philip J Weston; Matthew Signal; J Geoffrey Chase; Jane E Harding
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Hypoglycemic brain injury.

Authors:  R C Vannucci; S J Vannucci
Journal:  Semin Neonatol       Date:  2001-04

8.  Global motion perception in 2-year-old children: a method for psychophysical assessment and relationships with clinical measures of visual function.

Authors:  Tzu-Ying Yu; Robert J Jacobs; Nicola S Anstice; Nabin Paudel; Jane E Harding; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.

Authors:  Paulette Schmidt; Maureen Maguire; Velma Dobson; Graham Quinn; Elise Ciner; Lynn Cyert; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Bruce Moore; Deborah Orel-Bixler; Maryann Redford; Gui-shuang Ying
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Association Between Transient Newborn Hypoglycemia and Fourth-Grade Achievement Test Proficiency: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Kaiser; Shasha Bai; Neal Gibson; Greg Holland; Tsai Mei Lin; Christopher J Swearingen; Jennifer K Mehl; Nahed O ElHassan
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 16.193

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Approach to hypoglycemia in infants and children.

Authors:  Kajal Gandhi
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2017-10

Review 2.  Hypoglycemia in the preterm neonate: etiopathogenesis, diagnosis, management and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Anudeepa Sharma; Ajuah Davis; Prem S Shekhawat
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2017-10

Review 3.  An emerging evidence base for the management of neonatal hypoglycaemia.

Authors:  Jane E Harding; Deborah L Harris; Joanne E Hegarty; Jane M Alsweiler; Christopher Jd McKinlay
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Association of Neonatal Glycemia With Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 4.5 Years.

Authors:  Christopher J D McKinlay; Jane M Alsweiler; Nicola S Anstice; Nataliia Burakevych; Arijit Chakraborty; J Geoffrey Chase; Gregory D Gamble; Deborah L Harris; Robert J Jacobs; Yannan Jiang; Nabin Paudel; Ryan J San Diego; Benjamin Thompson; Trecia A Wouldes; Jane E Harding
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 16.193

5.  A Quality-Improvement Initiative to Reduce NICU Transfers for Neonates at Risk for Hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Sherry LeBlanc; Jamie Haushalter; Carl Seashore; Karen S Wood; Michael J Steiner; Ashley G Sutton
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Does dextrose gel prevent treatment failure in infants with neonatal hypoglycaemia?

Authors:  Stephanie L Bourque; Paul J Rozance
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.299

7.  Dextrose gels for neonatal transitional hypoglycemia: What are we giving our babies?

Authors:  Alfonso Solimano; Eddie Kwan; Horacio Osiovich; Roger Dyer; Rajavel Elango
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Cost-Utility Analysis of Prophylactic Dextrose Gel vs Standard Care for Neonatal Hypoglycemia in At-Risk Infants.

Authors:  Matthew J Glasgow; Richard Edlin; Jane E Harding
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 9.  Strategies to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes in babies at risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia.

Authors:  Jane M Alsweiler; Deborah L Harris; Jane E Harding; Christopher J D McKinlay
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2021-04-06

10.  Oral dextrose gel to prevent hypoglycaemia in at-risk neonates.

Authors:  Taygen Edwards; Gordon Liu; Joanne E Hegarty; Caroline A Crowther; Jane Alsweiler; Jane E Harding
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.