Literature DB >> 26613492

Comparative Study of Selected Wave Function and Density Functional Methods for Noncovalent Interaction Energy Calculations Using the Extended S22 Data Set.

Lucie Gráfová1, Michal Pitoňák1, Jan Řezáč1, Pavel Hobza1.   

Abstract

In this paper, an extension of the S22 data set of Jurecka et al. ( Jurečka , P. ; Šponer , J. ; Černý , J. ; Hobza , P. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006 , 8 , 1985. ), the data set of benchmark CCSD(T)/CBS interaction energies of twenty-two noncovalent complexes in equilibrium geometries, is presented. The S22 data set has been extended by including the stretched (one shortened and three elongated) complex geometries of the S22 data set along the main noncovalent interaction coordinate. The goal of this work is to assess the accuracy of the popular wave function methods (MP2-, MP3- and, CCSD-based) and density functional methods (with and without empirical correction for the dispersion energy) for noncovalent complexes based on a statistical evaluation not only in equilibrium, but also in nonequilibrium geometries. The results obtained in this work provide information on whether an accurate and balanced description of the different interaction types and complex geometry distortions can be expected from the tested methods. This information has an important implication in the calculation of large molecular complexes, where the number of distant interacting molecular fragments, often in far from equilibrium geometries, increases rapidly with the system size. The best performing WFT methods were found to be the SCS-CCSD (spin-component scaled CCSD, according to Takatani , T. ; Hohenstein , E. G. ; Sherrill , C. D. J. Chem. Phys. 2008 , 128 , 124111 ), MP2C (dispersion-corrected MP2, according to Hesselmann , A. J. Chem. Phys. 2008 , 128 , 144112 ), and MP2.5 (scaled MP3, according to Pitoňák , M. ; Neogrády , P. ; Černý , J. ; Grimme , S. ; Hobza , P. ChemPhysChem 2009 , 10 , 282. ). Since none of the DFT methods fulfilled the required statistical criteria proposed in this work, they cannot be generally recommended for large-scale calculations. The DFT methods still have the potential to deliver accurate results for large molecules, but most likely on the basis of an error cancellation.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 26613492     DOI: 10.1021/ct1002253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  14 in total

1.  AMOEBA+ Classical Potential for Modeling Molecular Interactions.

Authors:  Chengwen Liu; Jean-Philip Piquemal; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 2.  Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods for Noncovalent Interactions for Chemical and Biochemical Applications.

Authors:  Anders S Christensen; Tomáš Kubař; Qiang Cui; Marcus Elstner
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Parameterization of a B3LYP specific correction for non-covalent interactions and basis set superposition error on a gigantic dataset of CCSD(T) quality non-covalent interaction energies.

Authors:  Severin T Schneebeli; Arteum D Bochevarov; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  An Efficient Method to Evaluate Intermolecular Interaction Energies in Large Systems Using Overlapping Multicenter ONIOM and the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method.

Authors:  Naoya Asada; Dmitri G Fedorov; Kazuo Kitaura; Isao Nakanishi; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 6.475

5.  The BioFragment Database (BFDb): An open-data platform for computational chemistry analysis of noncovalent interactions.

Authors:  Lori A Burns; John C Faver; Zheng Zheng; Michael S Marshall; Daniel G A Smith; Kenno Vanommeslaeghe; Alexander D MacKerell; Kenneth M Merz; C David Sherrill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  A Minimum Quantum Chemistry CCSD(T)/CBS Data Set of Dimeric Interaction Energies for Small Organic Functional Groups: Heterodimers.

Authors:  Hsing-Hsiang Huang; Yi-Siang Wang; Sheng D Chao
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-05-31

7.  The accuracy of quantum chemical methods for large noncovalent complexes.

Authors:  Robert Sedlak; Tomasz Janowski; Michal Pitoňák; Jan Rezáč; Peter Pulay; Pavel Hobza
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Improving intermolecular interactions in DFTB3 using extended polarization from chemical-potential equalization.

Authors:  Anders S Christensen; Marcus Elstner; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Unraveling the performance of dispersion-corrected functionals for the accurate description of weakly bound natural polyphenols.

Authors:  Florent Di Meo; Imene Bayach; Patrick Trouillas; Juan-Carlos Sancho-García
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  S66: A Well-balanced Database of Benchmark Interaction Energies Relevant to Biomolecular Structures.

Authors:  Jan Rezáč; Kevin E Riley; Pavel Hobza
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.