Literature DB >> 26609169

Plasma 3-Epi-25-Hydroxycholecalciferol Can Alter the Assessment of Vitamin D Status Using the Current Reference Ranges for Pregnant Women and Their Newborns.

Fariba Aghajafari1, Catherine J Field2, Doreen Rabi3, Bonnie J Kaplan3, Jack A Maggiore4, Maeve O'Beirne3, David A Hanley3, Misha Eliasziw5, Deborah Dewey3, Sue Ross6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D is critical for healthy pregnancies and normal fetal development. It is important to accurately ascertain vitamin D status in mothers and their newborns to establish the optimal vitamin D concentration during pregnancy. There are many different metabolites and epimers of vitamin D in peripheral blood and controversy as to the importance of epimers in estimating vitamin D status in maternal and infant health.
OBJECTIVES: We undertook this study to measure 25-hydroxyvitamin D metabolites and epimers and their relations in maternal and cord blood and to evaluate the impact of the inclusion of epimers on assessing vitamin D status.
METHODS: We performed a substudy in a longitudinal cohort of pregnant women and their infants in Alberta, Canada [APrON (Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition) Study]. Maternal and cord blood plasma collected at the time of newborn delivery was stored at -70°C until testing and assayed for 25-hydroxyergocalciferol [25(OH)D2], 25-hydroxycholecalciferol [25(OH)D3], and 3-epi-25-hydroxycholecalciferol [3-epi-25(OH)D3] by using LC-tandem mass spectrometry. The effect of 3-epi-25(OH)D3 on estimates of vitamin D adequacy was explored by using McNemar's chi-square test at both recommended thresholds of 50 and 75 nmol/L.
RESULTS: Ninety-two pairs of maternal and cord blood samples were obtained. 3-Epi-25(OH)D3 was detected in all samples, comprising 6.0% and 7.8% of 25(OH)D3 in maternal and cord blood, respectively. Positive correlations were found between 25(OH)D3 and 3-epi-25(OH)D3 for both maternal and cord blood (maternal blood: r = 0.34, P = 0.01; cord blood: r = 0.44, P = 0.01). In addition, regression analysis showed a significant association between vitamin D supplementation and 3-epi-25(OH)D3 in maternal and cord blood (β: 0.423; 95% CI: 0.173, 0.672). When 3-epi-25(OH)D3 was not included in plasma vitamin D estimations, 38% of women and 80% of neonates were classified as having an insufficient concentration (<75 nmol/L); however, with 3-epi-25(OH)D3 included, the estimates of insufficiency were significantly lower: 33% and 73% for women and neonates, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Using LC-MS/MS we showed the presence of 3-epi-25(OH)D3 in all samples of pregnant women and their cord blood, and when the 3-epimer was included in the estimation of status the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency (<75 nmol/L) was significantly lower. Our data suggest that the high use of dietary supplements in this group of women contributes to 3-epi-25(OH)D3 concentrations in both maternal and cord blood. Further research on the role of the epimers in characterizing vitamin D status in pregnancy and infancy is imperative.
© 2016 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  25(OH)D; 3-epi-25(OH)D3; LC-MS/MS; cord blood; pregnancy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26609169     DOI: 10.3945/jn.115.220095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  15 in total

Review 1.  Vitamin D Metabolism and Guidelines for Vitamin D Supplementation.

Authors:  Indra Ramasamy
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2020-12

2.  Disparities in Vitamin D Status of Newborn Infants from a Diverse Sociodemographic Population in Montreal, Canada.

Authors:  Hope A Weiler; Catherine A Vanstone; Maryam Razaghi; Nathalie Gharibeh; Sharina Patel; Shu Q Wei; Dayre McNally
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.687

3.  Measurement of Vitamin D for Epidemiologic and Clinical Research: Shining Light on a Complex Decision.

Authors:  Anne Marie Z Jukic; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Pamela L Lutsey
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  The Road Not So Travelled: Should Measurement of Vitamin D Epimers during Pregnancy Affect Our Clinical Decisions?

Authors:  Spyridon N Karras; Kalliopi Kotsa; Elena Angeloudi; Pantelis Zebekakis; Declan P Naughton
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Both Mother and Infant Require a Vitamin D Supplement to Ensure That Infants' Vitamin D Status Meets Current Guidelines.

Authors:  Fariba Aghajafari; Catherine J Field; Amy R Weinberg; Nicole Letourneau
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Pregnant Women with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Are at Increased Risk of Vitamin D Insufficiency: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Sangmin Lee; Amy Metcalfe; Maitreyi Raman; Yvette Leung; Fariba Aghajafari; Nicole Letourneau; Remo Panaccione; Gilaad G Kaplan; Cynthia H Seow
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 9.071

7.  The Current Recommended Vitamin D Intake Guideline for Diet and Supplements During Pregnancy Is Not Adequate to Achieve Vitamin D Sufficiency for Most Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Fariba Aghajafari; Catherine J Field; Bonnie J Kaplan; Doreen M Rabi; Jack A Maggiore; Maeve O'Beirne; David A Hanley; Misha Eliasziw; Deborah Dewey; Amy Weinberg; Sue J Ross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Quality assessment of systematic reviews of vitamin D, cognition and dementia.

Authors:  Fariba Aghajafari; Dimity Pond; Nigel Catzikiris; Ian Cameron
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2018-07

9.  Validation and Determination of 25(OH) Vitamin D and 3-Epi25(OH)D3 in Breastmilk and Maternal- and Infant Plasma during Breastfeeding.

Authors:  Jennifer Gjerde; Marian Kjellevold; Lisbeth Dahl; Torill Berg; Annbjørg Bøkevoll; Maria Wik Markhus
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Epimers of Vitamin D: A Review.

Authors:  Bashar Al-Zohily; Asma Al-Menhali; Salah Gariballa; Afrozul Haq; Iltaf Shah
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.