Literature DB >> 26609065

Stochastic focusing coupled with negative feedback enables robust regulation in biochemical reaction networks.

Andreas Milias-Argeitis1, Stefan Engblom2, Pavol Bauer2, Mustafa Khammash3.   

Abstract

Nature presents multiple intriguing examples of processes that proceed with high precision and regularity. This remarkable stability is frequently counter to modellers' experience with the inherent stochasticity of chemical reactions in the regime of low-copy numbers. Moreover, the effects of noise and nonlinearities can lead to 'counterintuitive' behaviour, as demonstrated for a basic enzymatic reaction scheme that can display stochastic focusing (SF). Under the assumption of rapid signal fluctuations, SF has been shown to convert a graded response into a threshold mechanism, thus attenuating the detrimental effects of signal noise. However, when the rapid fluctuation assumption is violated, this gain in sensitivity is generally obtained at the cost of very large product variance, and this unpredictable behaviour may be one possible explanation of why, more than a decade after its introduction, SF has still not been observed in real biochemical systems. In this work, we explore the noise properties of a simple enzymatic reaction mechanism with a small and fluctuating number of active enzymes that behaves as a high-gain, noisy amplifier due to SF caused by slow enzyme fluctuations. We then show that the inclusion of a plausible negative feedback mechanism turns the system from a noisy signal detector to a strong homeostatic mechanism by exchanging high gain with strong attenuation in output noise and robustness to parameter variations. Moreover, we observe that the discrepancy between deterministic and stochastic descriptions of stochastically focused systems in the evolution of the means almost completely disappears, despite very low molecule counts and the additional nonlinearity due to feedback. The reaction mechanism considered here can provide a possible resolution to the apparent conflict between intrinsic noise and high precision in critical intracellular processes.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Keywords:  dynamic disorder; feedback regulation; stochastic chemical kinetics; stochastic focusing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26609065      PMCID: PMC4707857          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  25 in total

1.  Circadian clocks limited by noise.

Authors:  N Barkai; S Leibler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Stochastic focusing: fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation.

Authors:  J Paulsson; O G Berg; M Ehrenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Attenuation of noise in ultrasensitive signaling cascades.

Authors:  Mukund Thattai; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Fast evaluation of fluctuations in biochemical networks with the linear noise approximation.

Authors:  Johan Elf; Måns Ehrenberg
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Molecular discreteness in reaction-diffusion systems yields steady states not seen in the continuum limit.

Authors:  Yuichi Togashi; Kunihiko Kaneko
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2004-08-23

6.  Efficient attenuation of stochasticity in gene expression through post-transcriptional control.

Authors:  Peter S Swain
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Surviving heat shock: control strategies for robustness and performance.

Authors:  H El-Samad; H Kurata; J C Doyle; C A Gross; M Khammash
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Stochastic amplification and signaling in enzymatic futile cycles through noise-induced bistability with oscillations.

Authors:  Michael Samoilov; Sergey Plyasunov; Adam P Arkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Ever-fluctuating single enzyme molecules: Michaelis-Menten equation revisited.

Authors:  Brian P English; Wei Min; Antoine M van Oijen; Kang Taek Lee; Guobin Luo; Hongye Sun; Binny J Cherayil; S C Kou; X Sunney Xie
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2005-12-25       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 10.  Engineering allostery.

Authors:  Srivatsan Raman; Noah Taylor; Naomi Genuth; Stanley Fields; George M Church
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 11.639

View more
  4 in total

1.  Mechanisms of stochastic focusing and defocusing in biological reaction networks: insight from accurate chemical master equation (ACME) solutions.

Authors:  Gamze Gursoy; Anna Terebus
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

2.  Dynamic disorder in simple enzymatic reactions induces stochastic amplification of substrate.

Authors:  Ankit Gupta; Andreas Milias-Argeitis; Mustafa Khammash
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  The dynamic mechanism of noisy signal decoding in gene regulation.

Authors:  Peijiang Liu; Haohua Wang; Lifang Huang; Tianshou Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Inherent regulatory asymmetry emanating from network architecture in a prevalent autoregulatory motif.

Authors:  Md Zulfikar Ali; Vinuselvi Parisutham; Sandeep Choubey; Robert C Brewster
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 8.140

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.