Literature DB >> 15544806

Efficient attenuation of stochasticity in gene expression through post-transcriptional control.

Peter S Swain1.   

Abstract

Thermal fluctuations can lead to significant, unpredictable concentration changes in intracellular molecules, potentially disrupting the functioning of cellular networks and challenging cellular efficiency. Biochemical systems might therefore be expected to have evolved network architectures and motifs that limit the effects of stochastic disturbances. During gene expression itself, stochasticity, or "noise", in protein concentrations is believed to be determined mostly by mRNA, rather than protein, levels. Here, we demonstrate in silico, and analytically, how a number of commonly occurring network architectures in bacteria use mRNA to efficiently attenuate fluctuations. Genes coded in operons share mRNA, which we show generates strongly correlated expression despite multiple ribosome binding sites. For autogeneous control, we provide general analytic expressions using Langevin theory, and demonstrate that negative translational feedback has a much greater efficiency at reducing stochasticity than negative transcriptional feedback. Using the ribosomal proteins as an example, we also show that translational, rather than transcriptional, feedback best coordinates gene expression during assembly of macromolecular complexes. Our findings suggest that selection of a gene controlled post-transcriptionally may be for the resulting low stochasticity in its expression. Such low noise genes can be speculated to play a central role in the local gene network.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15544806     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.09.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  71 in total

1.  Identifying sources of variation and the flow of information in biochemical networks.

Authors:  Clive G Bowsher; Peter S Swain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Stochastic focusing coupled with negative feedback enables robust regulation in biochemical reaction networks.

Authors:  Andreas Milias-Argeitis; Stefan Engblom; Pavol Bauer; Mustafa Khammash
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Regulated degradation is a mechanism for suppressing stochastic fluctuations in gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Hana El-Samad; Mustafa Khammash
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Operon formation is driven by co-regulation and not by horizontal gene transfer.

Authors:  Morgan N Price; Katherine H Huang; Adam P Arkin; Eric J Alm
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Molecular level stochastic model for competence cycles in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Daniel Schultz; Eshel Ben Jacob; José N Onuchic; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Optimal feedback strength for noise suppression in autoregulatory gene networks.

Authors:  Abhyudai Singh; Joao P Hespanha
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Elimination of fast variables in chemical Langevin equations.

Authors:  Yueheng Lan; Timothy C Elston; Garegin A Papoian
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Quantifying origins of cell-to-cell variations in gene expression.

Authors:  Julia Rausenberger; Markus Kollmann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Translational repression contributes greater noise to gene expression than transcriptional repression.

Authors:  Michał Komorowski; Jacek Miekisz; Andrzej M Kierzek
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Engineering stochasticity in gene expression.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tabor; Travis S Bayer; Zachary B Simpson; Matthew Levy; Andrew D Ellington
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2008-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.