Literature DB >> 28045223

On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality.

Benjamin Bodmer1, Christian Beste1,2.   

Abstract

The ability to inhibit responses is a central sensorimotor function but only recently the importance of sensory processes for motor inhibition mechanisms went more into the research focus. In this regard it is elusive, whether there are differences between sensory modalities to trigger response inhibition processes. Due to functional neuroanatomical considerations strong differences may exist, for example, between the visual and the tactile modality. In the current study we examine what neurophysiological mechanisms as well as functional neuroanatomical networks are modulated during response inhibition. Therefore, a Go/NoGo-paradigm employing a novel combination of visual, tactile, and visuotactile stimuli was used. The data show that the tactile modality is more powerful than the visual modality to trigger response inhibition processes. However, the tactile modality loses its efficacy to trigger response inhibition processes when being combined with the visual modality. This may be due to competitive mechanisms leading to a suppression of certain sensory stimuli and the response selection level. Variations in sensory modalities specifically affected conflict monitoring processes during response inhibition by modulating activity in a frontal parietal network including the right inferior frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex and the temporoparietal junction. Attentional selection processes are not modulated. The results suggest that the functional neuroanatomical networks involved in response inhibition critically depends on the nature of the sensory input. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1941-1951, 2017.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; frontal cortex; parietal cortex; response inhibition; sensory modalities; source localization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28045223      PMCID: PMC6866904          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  44 in total

1.  Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Nick Yeung; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Effects of redundant visual stimuli on temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Eva Kühlwein; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-05

3.  Identification of attention and cognitive control networks in a parametric auditory fMRI study.

Authors:  René Westerhausen; Matthias Moosmann; Kimmo Alho; Stein-Ove Belsby; Heikki Hämäläinen; Svyatoslav Medvedev; Karsten Specht; Kenneth Hugdahl
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Vigilance and intrinsic maintenance of alert state: An ERP study.

Authors:  Anne Bonnefond; Nadège Doignon-Camus; Pascale Touzalin-Chretien; André Dufour
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Ipsilateral cortical connections of motor, premotor, frontal eye, and posterior parietal fields in a prosimian primate, Otolemur garnetti.

Authors:  Pei-Chun Fang; Iwona Stepniewska; Jon H Kaas
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 6.  Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions.

Authors:  René J Huster; Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert; Christina F Lavallee; Michael Falkenstein; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Dissociable electrophysiological subprocesses during response inhibition are differentially modulated by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors.

Authors:  Christian Beste; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Jörg T Epplen; Larissa Arning
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.600

Review 8.  Executive functions.

Authors:  Adele Diamond
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Understanding the role of the primary somatosensory cortex: Opportunities for rehabilitation.

Authors:  M R Borich; S M Brodie; W A Gray; S Ionta; L A Boyd
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Interactions between the Midbrain Superior Colliculus and the Basal Ganglia.

Authors:  Peter Redgrave; Veronique Coizet; Eliane Comoli; John G McHaffie; Mariana Leriche; Nicolas Vautrelle; Lauren M Hayes; Paul Overton
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.856

View more
  16 in total

1.  How the depth of processing modulates emotional interference - evidence from EEG and pupil diameter data.

Authors:  Marie Luise Schreiter; Witold X Chmielewski; Moritz Mückschel; Tjalf Ziemssen; Christian Beste
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  The neurophysiological basis of developmental changes during sequential cognitive flexibility between adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Franziska Giller; Rui Zhang; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The system-neurophysiological basis for how methylphenidate modulates perceptual-attentional conflicts during auditory processing.

Authors:  Nico Adelhöfer; Krutika Gohil; Susanne Passow; Benjamin Teufert; Veit Roessner; Shu-Chen Li; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Distinguishing stimulus and response codes in theta oscillations in prefrontal areas during inhibitory control of automated responses.

Authors:  Moritz Mückschel; Gabriel Dippel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  On the relevance of EEG resting theta activity for the neurophysiological dynamics underlying motor inhibitory control.

Authors:  Charlotte Pscherer; Moritz Mückschel; Lena Summerer; Annet Bluschke; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Somatosensory lateral inhibition processes modulate motor response inhibition - an EEG source localization study.

Authors:  Julia Friedrich; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Paradoxical, causal effects of sensory gain modulation on motor inhibitory control - a tDCS, EEG-source localization study.

Authors:  Julia Friedrich; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A comparative study on the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying effects of methylphenidate and neurofeedback on inhibitory control in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Annet Bluschke; Julia Friedrich; Marie Luise Schreiter; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.881

9.  Neural Basis of Extremely High Temporal Sensitivity: Insights From a Patient With Autism.

Authors:  Masakazu Ide; Takeshi Atsumi; Mrinmoy Chakrabarty; Ayako Yaguchi; Yumi Umesawa; Reiko Fukatsu; Makoto Wada
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Machine learning provides novel neurophysiological features that predict performance to inhibit automated responses.

Authors:  Amirali Vahid; Moritz Mückschel; Andres Neuhaus; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.