| Literature DB >> 26604023 |
A Dick Vethaak1, Ian M Davies2, John E Thain3, Matthew J Gubbins2, Concepción Martínez-Gómez4, Craig D Robinson2, Colin F Moffat2, Thierry Burgeot5, Thomas Maes6, Werner Wosniok7, Michelle Giltrap8, Thomas Lang9, Ketil Hylland10.
Abstract
Many maritime countries in Europe have implemented marine environmental monitoring programmes which include the measurement of chemical contaminants and related biological effects. How best to integrate data obtained in these two types of monitoring into meaningful assessments has been the subject of recent efforts by the International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES) Expert Groups. Work within these groups has concentrated on defining a core set of chemical and biological endpoints that can be used across maritime areas, defining confounding factors, supporting parameters and protocols for measurement. The framework comprised markers for concentrations of, exposure to and effects from, contaminants. Most importantly, assessment criteria for biological effect measurements have been set and the framework suggests how these measurements can be used in an integrated manner alongside contaminant measurements in biota, sediments and potentially water. Output from this process resulted in OSPAR Commission (www.ospar.org) guidelines that were adopted in 2012 on a trial basis for a period of 3 years. The developed assessment framework can furthermore provide a suitable approach for the assessment of Good Environmental Status (GES) for Descriptor 8 of the European Union (EU) Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD).Entities:
Keywords: Bioassay; Biomarker; Biomonitoring; Chemical measurements; Environmental; ICES; Impact; MSFD; OSPAR; Pollution effects
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26604023 DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.09.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Environ Res ISSN: 0141-1136 Impact factor: 3.130