Literature DB >> 15868432

Combined flow cytometry determination of S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy is an independent prognostic factor in node-negative invasive breast carcinoma: analysis of a series of 271 patients with stage I and II breast cancer.

L Moureau-Zabotto1, C Bouchet, D Cesari, S Uzan, J-P Lefranc, M Antoine, C Genestie, E Deniaud-Alexandre, J-F Bernaudin, E Touboul, J Fleury-Feith.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the significance of S-phase fraction (SPF) and DNA ploidy evaluated by DNA flow cytometry as prognostic markers in stage I or II breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 271 patients, treated by surgery, radiotherapy +/- systemic therapy was analyzed (median follow up: 64 months). Standardized flow cytometry cell preparation from frozen samples and consensus rules for data interpretation were followed. Three SPF classes were defined on the basis of tertiles after adjustment for ploidy. Four groups were defined based on combinations of DNA ploidy (DIP: diploid; ANEUP: aneuploid) and SPF: DIP and low SPF (DL, n=37), DIP and medium or high SPF (DMH, n=76), ANEUP and low SPF (AL, n=24), ANEUP and medium or high SPF (AMH, n=68). Local control rate (LCR), disease-free survival (DFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) were correlated with DNA ploidy, SPF, DL to AMH groups, T and N stages, SBR grading, age, and hormonal status on univariate and multivariate analysis (Cox model).
RESULTS: On univariate analysis, DFS and LCR were higher for DIP tumours. High SPF values were associated with shorter DFS. LCR, MFS, DFS, and OS rates were significantly different with an increasingly poorer prognosis from DL to AMH. On multivariate analysis, groups DL to AMH, histological node involvement and T stage were independently associated with MFS, and DFS. In N- patients, DL to AMH remained independent for MFS and DFS. For SBR III tumours, MFS and OS were significantly different in DL to AMH groups. These results strongly support the use of combined evaluation of DNA ploidy and SPF as independent parameters in clinical trials for N- stage I and II breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15868432     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-004-7047-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  7 in total

1.  Expression of connexin 32 and connexin 43 in acute myeloid leukemia and their roles in proliferation.

Authors:  Sha Yi; Yan Chen; Lu Wen; Lijing Yang; Guohui Cui
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Somatic copy number alterations are predictive of progression-free survival in patients with lung adenocarcinoma undergoing radiotherapy.

Authors:  Fan Kou; Lei Wu; Yan Guo; Bailu Zhang; Baihui Li; Ziqi Huang; Xiubao Ren; Lili Yang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 5.347

Review 3.  Revisiting tumour aneuploidy - the place of ploidy assessment in the molecular era.

Authors:  Håvard E Danielsen; Manohar Pradhan; Marco Novelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Can the centrosome be a marker for DNA ploidy in breast cancer?

Authors:  Rita A Sakr; Jocelyne Fleury; Claudie Prengel; Jean-Francois Bernaudin; Serge Uzan; Roman Rouzier; Emile Darai
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Lymph node status as a guide to selection of available prognostic markers in breast cancer: the clinical practice of the future?

Authors:  A Elzagheid; T Kuopio; S Pyrhönen; Y Collan
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 6.  Metastatic and triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and treatment options.

Authors:  Sumayah Al-Mahmood; Justin Sapiezynski; Olga B Garbuzenko; Tamara Minko
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.617

7.  DNA aneuploidy and breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 141,163 cases.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Lei Huang; Jun Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.