Literature DB >> 26598238

Protein Structure Is Related to RNA Structural Reactivity In Vivo.

Yin Tang1, Sarah M Assmann2, Philip C Bevilacqua3.   

Abstract

We assessed whether in vivo mRNA structural reactivity and the structure of the encoded protein are related. This is the first investigation of such a relationship that utilizes information on RNA structure obtained in living cells. Based on our recent genome-wide Structure-seq analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana, we report that, as a meta property, regions of individual mRNAs that code for protein domains generally have higher reactivity to DMS (dimethyl sulfate), a chemical that covalently modifies accessible As and Cs, than regions that encode protein domain junctions. This relationship is prominent for proteins annotated for catalytic activity and reversed in proteins annotated for binding and transcription regulatory activity. Upon analyzing intrinsically disordered proteins, we found a similar pattern for disordered regions as compared to ordered regions: regions of individual mRNAs that code for ordered regions have significantly higher DMS reactivity than regions that code for intrinsically disordered regions. Based on these effects, we hypothesize that the decreased DMS reactivity of RNA regions that encode protein domain junctions or intrinsically disordered regions may reflect increased RNA structure that may slow translation, allowing time for the nascent protein domain or ordered region of the protein to fold, thereby reducing protein misfolding. In addition, a drop in DMS reactivity was observed on portions of mRNA sequences that correspond to the C-termini of protein domains, suggesting ribosome protection at these mRNA regions. Structural relationships between mRNAs and their encoded proteins may have evolved to allow efficient and accurate protein folding.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arabidopsis thaliana; RNA structure; Structure-seq; intrinsically disordered protein (IDP); protein domain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26598238     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  5 in total

1.  Challenges in RNA Structural Modeling and Design.

Authors:  Anna Marie Pyle; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  The roles of five conserved lentiviral RNA structures in HIV-1 replication.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Jianbo Chen; Olga A Nikolaitchik; Belete A Desimmie; Steven Busan; Vinay K Pathak; Kevin M Weeks; Wei-Shau Hu
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.616

Review 3.  Physical and Functional Analysis of Viral RNA Genomes by SHAPE.

Authors:  Mark A Boerneke; Jeffrey E Ehrhardt; Kevin M Weeks
Journal:  Annu Rev Virol       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 10.431

Review 4.  Translational gene regulation in plants: A green new deal.

Authors:  Ricardo A Urquidi Camacho; Ansul Lokdarshi; Albrecht G von Arnim
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 9.349

5.  Role of mRNA structure in the control of protein folding.

Authors:  Guilhem Faure; Aleksey Y Ogurtsov; Svetlana A Shabalina; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 16.971

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.