Francesca Gay1, Stefania Oliva1, Maria Teresa Petrucci2, Concetta Conticello3, Lucio Catalano4, Paolo Corradini5, Agostina Siniscalchi6, Valeria Magarotto1, Luděk Pour7, Angelo Carella8, Alessandra Malfitano1, Daniela Petrò9, Andrea Evangelista10, Stefano Spada1, Norbert Pescosta11, Paola Omedè1, Philip Campbell12, Anna Marina Liberati13, Massimo Offidani14, Roberto Ria15, Stefano Pulini16, Francesca Patriarca17, Roman Hajek18, Andrew Spencer19, Mario Boccadoro1, Antonio Palumbo20. 1. Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy. 2. Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. 3. Divisione di Ematologia, Azienda Policlinico-OVE, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy. 4. Policlinico Universitario Federico II, Naples, Italy. 5. Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. 6. UOC Ematologia Ospedale S Eugenio, Rome, Italy. 7. Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. 8. UOC Ematologia IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy. 9. Hematology Department, Niquarda Ca'Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy. 10. Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino and CPO Piemonte, Turin, Italy. 11. Ematologia e Centro TMO Ospedale Centrale Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy. 12. Haematology Department, Cancer Services, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia. 13. A O S Maria di Terni, S C Oncoematologia, Terni, Italy. 14. Division of Hematology, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy. 15. University of Bari Aldo Moro Medical School, Department of Biomedical Science, Internal Medicine G Baccelli Policlinico, Bari, Italy. 16. Dipartimento di Ematologia, Medicina Trasfusionale e Biotecnologie, U O Ematologia Clinica, Ospedale Civile Spirito Santo, Pescara, Italy. 17. Azienda O U di Udine, DISM, Università di Udine, Udine, Italy. 18. Department of Haematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic. 19. Department of Clinical Haematology, Alfred Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 20. Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy. Electronic address: appalumbo@yahoo.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-dose melphalan plus autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard approach in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Our aims were to compare consolidation with high-dose melphalan plus ASCT versus chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone) plus lenalidomide, and maintenance with lenalidomide plus prednisone versus lenalidomide alone. METHODS: We did an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 study at 59 centres in Australia, Czech Republic, and Italy. We enrolled transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed myeloma aged 65 years or younger. Patients received a common induction with four 28-day cycles of lenalidomide (25 mg, days 1-21) and dexamethasone (40 mg, days 1, 8, 15, and 22) and subsequent chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (3 g/m(2)) followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for stem-cell mobilisation and collection. Using a 2 × 2 partial factorial design, we randomised patients to consolidation with either chemotherapy plus lenalidomide (six cycles of cyclophosphamide [300 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, and 15], dexamethasone [40 mg, days 1, 8, 15, and 22], and lenalidomide [25 mg, days 1-21]) or two courses of high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m(2)) and ASCT. We also randomised patients to maintenance with lenalidomide (10 mg, days 1-21) plus prednisone (50 mg, every other day) or lenalidomide alone. A simple randomisation sequence was used to assign patients at enrolment into one of the four groups (1:1:1:1 ratio), but the treatment allocation was disclosed only when the patient reached the end of the induction and confirmed their eligibility for consolidation. Both the patient and the treating clinician did not know the consolidation and maintenance arm until that time. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by intention-to-treat. The trial is ongoing and some patients are still receiving maintenance. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01091831. FINDINGS:389 patients were enrolled between July 6, 2009, and May 6, 2011, with 256 eligible for consolidation (127 high-dose melphalan and ASCT and 129 chemotherapy plus lenalidomide) and 223 eligible for maintenance (117 lenalidomide plus prednisone and 106 lenalidomide alone). Median follow-up was 52·0 months (IQR 30·4-57·6). Progression-free survival during consolidation was significantly shorter with chemotherapy plus lenalidomide compared with high-dose melphalan and ASCT (median 28·6 months [95% CI 20·6-36·7] vs 43·3 months [33·2-52·2]; hazard ratio [HR] for the first 24 months 2·51, 95% CI 1·60-3·94; p<0·0001). Progression-free survival did not differ between maintenance treatments (median 37·5 months [95% CI 27·8-not evaluable] with lenalidomide plus prednisone vs 28·5 months [22·5-46·5] with lenalidomide alone; HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·59-1·20; p=0·34). Fewer grade 3 or 4 adverse events were recorded with chemotherapy plus lenalidomide than with high-dose melphalan and ASCT; the most frequent were haematological (34 [26%] of 129 patients vs 107 [84%] of 127 patients), gastrointestinal (six [5%] vs 25 [20%]), and infection (seven [5%] vs 24 [19%]). Haematological serious adverse events were reported in two (2%) patients assigned chemotherapy plus lenalidomide and no patients allocated high-dose melphalan and ASCT. Non-haematological serious adverse events were reported in 13 (10%) patients assigned chemotherapy plus lenalidomide and nine (7%) allocated high-dose melphalan and ASCT. During maintenance, adverse events did not differ between groups. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (nine [8%] of 117 patients assigned lenalidomide plus prednisone vs 14 [13%] of 106 allocated lenalidomide alone), infection (eight [8%] vs five [5%]), and systemic toxicities (seven [6%] vs two [2%]). Non-haematological serious adverse events were reported in 13 (11%) patients assigned lenalidomide plus prednisone versus ten (9%) allocated lenalidomide alone. Four patients died because of adverse events, three from infections (two during induction and one during consolidation) and one because of cardiac toxic effects. INTERPRETATION: Consolidation with high-dose melphalan and ASCT remains the preferred option in transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma, despite a better toxicity profile with chemotherapy plus lenalidomide. FUNDING: Celgene.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: High-dose melphalan plus autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard approach in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Our aims were to compare consolidation with high-dose melphalan plus ASCT versus chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone) plus lenalidomide, and maintenance with lenalidomide plus prednisone versus lenalidomide alone. METHODS: We did an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 study at 59 centres in Australia, Czech Republic, and Italy. We enrolled transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed myeloma aged 65 years or younger. Patients received a common induction with four 28-day cycles of lenalidomide (25 mg, days 1-21) and dexamethasone (40 mg, days 1, 8, 15, and 22) and subsequent chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (3 g/m(2)) followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for stem-cell mobilisation and collection. Using a 2 × 2 partial factorial design, we randomised patients to consolidation with either chemotherapy plus lenalidomide (six cycles of cyclophosphamide [300 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, and 15], dexamethasone [40 mg, days 1, 8, 15, and 22], and lenalidomide [25 mg, days 1-21]) or two courses of high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m(2)) and ASCT. We also randomised patients to maintenance with lenalidomide (10 mg, days 1-21) plus prednisone (50 mg, every other day) or lenalidomide alone. A simple randomisation sequence was used to assign patients at enrolment into one of the four groups (1:1:1:1 ratio), but the treatment allocation was disclosed only when the patient reached the end of the induction and confirmed their eligibility for consolidation. Both the patient and the treating clinician did not know the consolidation and maintenance arm until that time. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by intention-to-treat. The trial is ongoing and some patients are still receiving maintenance. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01091831. FINDINGS: 389 patients were enrolled between July 6, 2009, and May 6, 2011, with 256 eligible for consolidation (127 high-dose melphalan and ASCT and 129 chemotherapy plus lenalidomide) and 223 eligible for maintenance (117 lenalidomide plus prednisone and 106 lenalidomide alone). Median follow-up was 52·0 months (IQR 30·4-57·6). Progression-free survival during consolidation was significantly shorter with chemotherapy plus lenalidomide compared with high-dose melphalan and ASCT (median 28·6 months [95% CI 20·6-36·7] vs 43·3 months [33·2-52·2]; hazard ratio [HR] for the first 24 months 2·51, 95% CI 1·60-3·94; p<0·0001). Progression-free survival did not differ between maintenance treatments (median 37·5 months [95% CI 27·8-not evaluable] with lenalidomide plus prednisone vs 28·5 months [22·5-46·5] with lenalidomide alone; HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·59-1·20; p=0·34). Fewer grade 3 or 4 adverse events were recorded with chemotherapy plus lenalidomide than with high-dose melphalan and ASCT; the most frequent were haematological (34 [26%] of 129 patients vs 107 [84%] of 127 patients), gastrointestinal (six [5%] vs 25 [20%]), and infection (seven [5%] vs 24 [19%]). Haematological serious adverse events were reported in two (2%) patients assigned chemotherapy plus lenalidomide and no patients allocated high-dose melphalan and ASCT. Non-haematological serious adverse events were reported in 13 (10%) patients assigned chemotherapy plus lenalidomide and nine (7%) allocated high-dose melphalan and ASCT. During maintenance, adverse events did not differ between groups. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (nine [8%] of 117 patients assigned lenalidomide plus prednisone vs 14 [13%] of 106 allocated lenalidomide alone), infection (eight [8%] vs five [5%]), and systemic toxicities (seven [6%] vs two [2%]). Non-haematological serious adverse events were reported in 13 (11%) patients assigned lenalidomide plus prednisone versus ten (9%) allocated lenalidomide alone. Four patients died because of adverse events, three from infections (two during induction and one during consolidation) and one because of cardiac toxic effects. INTERPRETATION: Consolidation with high-dose melphalan and ASCT remains the preferred option in transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma, despite a better toxicity profile with chemotherapy plus lenalidomide. FUNDING: Celgene.
Authors: Lindsay M Morton; Wael Saber; K Scott Baker; A John Barrett; Smita Bhatia; Eric A Engels; Shahinaz M Gadalla; David E Kleiner; Steven Pavletic; Linda J Burns Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Francesca Gay; Graham Jackson; Laura Rosiñol; Sarah A Holstein; Philippe Moreau; Stefano Spada; Faith Davies; Juan José Lahuerta; Xavier Leleu; Sara Bringhen; Andrea Evangelista; Cyrille Hulin; Ugo Panzani; David A Cairns; Francesco Di Raimondo; Margaret Macro; Anna Marina Liberati; Charlotte Pawlyn; Massimo Offidani; Andrew Spencer; Roman Hájek; Evangelos Terpos; Gareth J Morgan; Joan Bladé; Pieter Sonneveld; Jesús San-Miguel; Philip L McCarthy; Heinz Ludwig; Mario Boccadoro; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Michel Attal Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Nils Winkelmann; Max Desole; Inken Hilgendorf; Thomas Ernst; Herbert G Sayer; Christa Kunert; Lars-Olof Mügge; Andreas Hochhaus; Sebastian Scholl Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2016-09-17 Impact factor: 4.553