Literature DB >> 27640002

Comparison of two dose levels of cyclophosphamide for successful stem cell mobilization in myeloma patients.

Nils Winkelmann1, Max Desole1,2, Inken Hilgendorf1, Thomas Ernst1, Herbert G Sayer1,3, Christa Kunert1, Lars-Olof Mügge1, Andreas Hochhaus1, Sebastian Scholl4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Even in the era of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs, the autologous stem cell transplantation after high-dose melphalan continues to represent a standard approach for myeloma patients in first-line therapy. Different mobilization chemotherapies before stem cell apheresis have been published while cyclophosphamide at a dose level of up to 4 g/m2 has been evaluated and is commonly applied. In contrast, lower dose levels of cyclophosphamide (e.g., 1.5 g/m2) did not result in a sufficient collection of stem cells.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the impact of "intermediate-dose" (ID-CY, 2.5 g/m2) versus "high-dose" (HD-CY, 4 g/m2) cyclophosphamide in 101 (48 vs. 53) consecutively evaluable myeloma patients (median age 59 years, range 32-72 years) who underwent stem cell mobilization after induction chemotherapy. Successful stem cell harvest was defined as a stem cell yield of at least 5 million CD34 cells per kg bodyweight. Evaluation of toxicity especially considered infectious complications and hematological toxicity in both subgroups.
RESULTS: Successful stem cell mobilization was achieved in 40 of 48 (83 %) and 44 of 53 (83 %) patients, respectively. The median time to apheresis (11 vs. 12 days) and the median CD34 content of stem cell harvest (8.3 vs. 7.6 million CD34 cells per kg bodyweight) did not differ significantly between both groups. There was a significant difference of WBC nadir in favor of the cyclophosphamide regimen with 2.5 g/m2 (0.8 vs. 0.3 Gpt/L, p = 0.021), and neutropenic fever was more often observed in patients who received 4 g/m2 cyclophosphamide (34 vs. 15 %, p = 0.078). Importantly, after induction chemotherapy using the VCD regimen (bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone), successful stem cell mobilization was achieved in 26 of 29 (90 %) patients treated with 2.5 g/m2 and 21 of 25 (84 %) patients receiving 4 g/m2 cyclophosphamide, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: ID-CY is safe and highly effective for stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma and associated with a reduced toxicity compared to HD-CY.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cyclophosphamide; Myeloma; Stem cell mobilization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27640002     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-016-2270-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  32 in total

1.  Stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after lenalidomide induction therapy.

Authors:  F Cavallo; S Bringhen; G Milone; D Ben-Yehuda; A Nagler; E Calabrese; N Cascavilla; V Montefusco; B Lupo; A M Liberati; C Crippa; F Rossini; R Passera; F Patriarca; A M Cafro; P Omedè; A M Carella; J Peccatori; L Catalano; T Caravita; P Musto; M T Petrucci; M Boccadoro; A Palumbo
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Harvesting of autologous blood stem cells after a mobilising regimen with low-dose cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Giorgio Lambertenghi Deliliers; Claudio Annaloro; Maurizio Marconi; Davide Soligo; Paolo Morandi; Camilla Luchesini; Elena Tagliaferri; Aldo Della Volpe
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2002-10

3.  European Myeloma Network guidelines for the management of multiple myeloma-related complications.

Authors:  Evangelos Terpos; Martina Kleber; Monika Engelhardt; Sonja Zweegman; Francesca Gay; Efstathios Kastritis; Niels W C J van de Donk; Benedetto Bruno; Orhan Sezer; Annemiek Broijl; Sara Bringhen; Meral Beksac; Alessandra Larocca; Roman Hajek; Pellegrino Musto; Hans Erik Johnsen; Fortunato Morabito; Heinz Ludwig; Michele Cavo; Hermann Einsele; Pieter Sonneveld; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Antonio Palumbo
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Predictive factors for a successful mobilization of peripheral blood CD34+ cells in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  G Perea; A Sureda; R Martino; A Altés; C Martínez; E Cabezudo; B Amill; G A Martín-Henao; Y González; L Muñoz; M Peyret; S Brunet; J Sierra
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.673

5.  Cyclophosphamide-based hematopoietic stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sascha A Tuchman; Wendi A Bacon; Li-Wen Huang; Gwynn Long; David Rizzieri; Mitchell Horwitz; John P Chute; Keith Sullivan; Ashley Morris Engemann; Amanda Yopp; Zhiguo Li; Kelly Corbet; Nelson Chao; Cristina Gasparetto
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.821

Review 6.  Indications for allo- and auto-SCT for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in Europe, 2015.

Authors:  A Sureda; P Bader; S Cesaro; P Dreger; R F Duarte; C Dufour; J H F Falkenburg; D Farge-Bancel; A Gennery; N Kröger; F Lanza; J C Marsh; A Nagler; C Peters; A Velardi; M Mohty; A Madrigal
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Comparable efficacy and lower cost of PBSC mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF compared with plerixafor and G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel therapies.

Authors:  F Awan; S T Kochuparambil; D E Falconer; A Cumpston; S Leadmon; K Watkins; D Deremer; A Jillella; M Craig; M Hamadani
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  VTD is superior to VCD prior to intensive therapy in multiple myeloma: results of the prospective IFM2013-04 trial.

Authors:  Philippe Moreau; Cyrille Hulin; Margaret Macro; Denis Caillot; Carine Chaleteix; Murielle Roussel; Laurent Garderet; Bruno Royer; Sabine Brechignac; Mourad Tiab; Mathieu Puyade; Martine Escoffre; Anne-Marie Stoppa; Thierry Facon; Brigitte Pegourie; Driss Chaoui; Arnaud Jaccard; Borhane Slama; Gerald Marit; Karim Laribi; Pascal Godmer; Odile Luycx; Jean-Claude Eisenmann; Olivier Allangba; Mamoun Dib; Carla Araujo; Jean Fontan; Karim Belhadj; Marc Wetterwald; Véronique Dorvaux; Jean-Paul Fermand; Philippe Rodon; Brigitte Kolb; Sylvie Glaisner; Jean-Valere Malfuson; Pascal Lenain; Laetitia Biron; Lucie Planche; Helene Caillon; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Thomas Dejoie; Michel Attal
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Infectious complications in patients receiving mobilization chemotherapy for autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection.

Authors:  Anand P Jillella; Celalettin Ustun; Eric Robach; Durdu Sertkaya; Cecily DiPiro; Andre M Kallab; Wendy G Brick; Paul M Dainer; Abdullah Kutlar; Andrea R Townsend; Russell E Burgess
Journal:  J Hematother Stem Cell Res       Date:  2003-04

10.  DSMM XI study: dose definition for intravenous cyclophosphamide in combination with bortezomib/dexamethasone for remission induction in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma.

Authors:  Martin Kropff; Peter Liebisch; Stefan Knop; Katja Weisel; Hannes Wand; Claudia-Nanette Gann; Wolfgang E Berdel; Herrmann Einsele
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.673

View more
  2 in total

1.  Improved progression-free and event-free survival in myeloma patients undergoing PBSCH receiving a cyclophosphamide + G-CSF regimen than G-CSF alone.

Authors:  Akira Tanimura; Risen Hirai; Miki Nakamura; Masataka Takeshita; Shotaro Hagiwara; Akiyoshi Miwa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  [Effect of cyclophosphamide on hematopoietic stem cells in mice with iron overload].

Authors:  Yanjun Xu; Tiantian Yi; Xiaoxiao Xu; Fuyu Pei; Yuelin He; Xuedong Wu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2020-01-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.