Literature DB >> 26596400

Postoperative Complications in the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study During Five Years of Follow-up.

Donald L Budenz1, William J Feuer2, Keith Barton3, Joyce Schiffman2, Vital P Costa4, David G Godfrey5, Yvonne M Buys6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the late complications in the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study during 5 years of follow-up.
DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: setting: Sixteen international clinical centers. STUDY POPULATION: Two hundred seventy-six subjects aged 18-85 years with previous intraocular surgery or refractory glaucoma with intraocular pressure of >18 mm Hg.
INTERVENTIONS: Ahmed Glaucoma Valve FP7 or Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant BG 101-350. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Late postoperative complications (beyond 3 months), reoperations for complications, and decreased vision from complications.
RESULTS: Late complications developed in 56 subjects (46.8 ± 4.8 5-year cumulative % ± SE) in the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve group and 67 (56.3 ± 4.7 5-year cumulative % ± SE) in the Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant group (P = .082). The cumulative rates of serious complications were 15.9% and 24.7% in the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve and Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant groups, respectively (P = .034), although this was largely driven by subjects who had tube occlusions in the 2 groups (0.8% in the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve group and 5.7% in the Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant group, P = .037). Both groups had a relatively high incidence of persistent diplopia (12%) and corneal edema (20%), although half of the corneal edema cases were likely due to pre-existing causes other than the aqueous shunt. The incidence of tube erosion was 1% and 3% in the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve and Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant groups, respectively (P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term rates of vision-threatening complications and complications resulting in reoperation were higher in the Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant than in the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve group over 5 years of follow-up.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26596400      PMCID: PMC4901387          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  28 in total

1.  The Ahmed Versus Baerveldt study: one-year treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Panos G Christakis; Jeffrey W Kalenak; David Zurakowski; James C Tsai; Jeffrey A Kammer; Paul J Harasymowycz; Iqbal I K Ahmed
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  A comparison of glaucoma drainage implant tube coverage.

Authors:  M Fran Smith; J William Doyle; John W Ticrney
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The Ahmed versus Baerveldt study: three-year treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Panos G Christakis; James C Tsai; Jeffrey W Kalenak; David Zurakowski; Louis B Cantor; Jeffrey A Kammer; Iqbal I K Ahmed
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Late endophthalmitis associated with glaucoma drainage implants.

Authors:  S J Gedde; I U Scott; H Tabandeh; K K Luu; D L Budenz; D S Greenfield; H W Flynn
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Use of Various Glaucoma Surgeries and Procedures in Medicare Beneficiaries from 1994 to 2012.

Authors:  Karun S Arora; Alan L Robin; Kevin J Corcoran; Suzanne L Corcoran; Pradeep Y Ramulu
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study after 1 year of follow-up.

Authors:  Donald L Budenz; Keith Barton; William J Feuer; Joyce Schiffman; Vital P Costa; David G Godfrey; Yvonne M Buys
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 7.  Glaucoma drainage devices: a systematic literature review and current controversies.

Authors:  Chian-Huey Hong; Analisa Arosemena; David Zurakowski; Ramesh S Ayyala
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  Experience with the use of Baerveldt and Ahmed glaucoma drainage implants in an Asian population.

Authors:  Jenn-C Wang; Jovina L S See; Paul T K Chew
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Motility disturbances in the tube versus trabeculectomy study during the first year of follow-up.

Authors:  Frederick M Rauscher; Steven J Gedde; Joyce C Schiffman; William J Feuer; Keith Barton; Richard K Lee
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Risk factors of implant exposure outside the conjunctiva after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation.

Authors:  Yong Soo Byun; Na Young Lee; Chan Kee Park
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 2.447

View more
  34 in total

1.  Measurement of Gamma-Irradiated Corneal Patch Graft Thickness After Aqueous Drainage Device Surgery.

Authors:  Regina A de Luna; Ameera Moledina; Jiangxia Wang; Henry D Jampel
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Baerveldt® glaucoma implant surgery with the double scleral flap technique to prevent Hoffman elbow exposure.

Authors:  Naoki Tojo; Tomoko Ueda-Consolvo; Shuichiro Yanagisawa; Atsushi Hayashi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Aqueous shunts for glaucoma.

Authors:  Victoria L Tseng; Anne L Coleman; Melinda Y Chang; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-28

4.  The Choice of Drainage Device in Complicated Glaucomas: Comparing Ahmed and Baerveldt Implants.

Authors:  Marilita M Moschos; Eirini Nitoda; Nikolaos Gouliopoulos; Sophia Androudi; Christos Damaskos; Konstantinos Laios; Eleni Bagkli; Nikolaos Garmpis; George Kitsos
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Comparison of complications after Ahmed versus Baerveldt implant in glaucoma patients: one year follow-up.

Authors:  Sara Listyani Koentjoro; Widya Artini; Iwan Soebijantoro; Vira Wardhana Istiantoro; Emma Rusmayani; Rini Sulastiwaty; Zeiras Eka Djamal; Arini Safira Nurul Akbar; Muhammad Yoserizal
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Effectiveness and safety of sulcus fixation of Baerveldt glaucoma implants in glaucomatous eyes in patients who underwent multiple intraocular surgeries.

Authors:  Sotaro Mori; Mari Sakamoto; Takuji Kurimoto; Akiyasu Kanamori; Kaori Ueda; Yukako Inoue; Yuko Yamada; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Effect of shunt type on rates of tube-cornea touch and corneal decompensation after tube shunt surgery in uveitic glaucoma.

Authors:  Sapna Sinha; Allen Y Ganjei; Melih Ustaoglu; Zeba A Syed; Daniel Lee; Jonathan S Myers; Scott J Fudemberg; Reza Razeghinejad
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Short-term Postoperative Visual Acuity Decrease and Recovery after Ahmed Tube Shunt Procedure for Glaucoma.

Authors:  Yingna Liu; Lijuan Huang; Qian Zhao; Qian Liu; Robert L Stamper; Ying Han
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2020-04-22

9.  Long-term results of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in Egyptian population.

Authors:  Eman Elhefney; Tharwat Mokbel; Waleed Abou Samra; Hanem Kishk; Tarek Mohsen; Amr El-Kannishy
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Metabolomics in Glaucoma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Xiao-Wen Hou; Gang Liang; Chen-Wei Pan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.