Literature DB >> 26595281

Effects of presentation duration on measures of complexity in affective environmental scenes and representational paintings.

Manuela M Marin1, Helmut Leder2.   

Abstract

Complexity constitutes an integral part of humans' environment and is inherent to information processing. However, little is known about the dynamics of visual complexity perception of affective environmental scenes (IAPS pictures) and artworks, such as affective representational paintings. In three experiments, we studied the time course of visual complexity perception by varying presentation duration and comparing subjective ratings with objective measures of complexity. In Experiment 1, 60 females rated 96 IAPS pictures, presented either for 1, 5, or 25s, for familiarity, complexity, pleasantness and arousal. In Experiment 2, another 60 females rated 96 representational paintings. Mean ratings of complexity and pleasantness changed according to presentation duration in a similar vein in both experiments, suggesting an inverted U-shape. No common pattern of results was observed for arousal and familiarity ratings across the two picture sets. The correlations between subjective and objective measures of complexity increased with longer exposure durations for IAPS pictures, but results were more ambiguous for paintings. Experiment 3 explored the time course of the multidimensionality of visual complexity perception. Another 109 females rated the number of objects, their disorganization and the differentiation between a figure-ground vs. complex scene composition of pictures presented for 1 and 5s. The multidimensionality of visual complexity only clearly emerged in the 5-s condition. In both picture sets, the strength of the correlations with objective measures depended on the type of subdimension of complexity and was less affected by presentation duration than correlations with general complexity in Experiments 1 and 2. These results have clear implications for perceptual and cognitive theories, especially for those of esthetic experiences, in which the dynamical changes of complexity perception need to be integrated.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complexity; Empirical esthetics; Exposure time; IAPS; Objective measures; Visual arts

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26595281     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  8 in total

1.  Beauty at a glance: The feeling of beauty and the amplitude of pleasure are independent of stimulus duration.

Authors:  Aenne A Brielmann; Lauren Vale; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Predicting perceived visual complexity of abstract patterns using computational measures: The influence of mirror symmetry on complexity perception.

Authors:  Andreas Gartus; Helmut Leder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Visual Complexity and Affect: Ratings Reflect More Than Meets the Eye.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan; Janine Bayer; Matthias Gamer; Tina B Lonsdorf; Tobias Sommer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-18

4.  Berlyne Revisited: Evidence for the Multifaceted Nature of Hedonic Tone in the Appreciation of Paintings and Music.

Authors:  Manuela M Marin; Allegra Lampatz; Michaela Wandl; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  The Ambiguity of Artworks -A Guideline for Empirical Aesthetics Research with Artworks as Stimuli.

Authors:  Gregor U Hayn-Leichsenring
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-24

6.  Better memory for intrinsic versus extrinsic details underlies the enhanced recollective experience of negative events.

Authors:  Mariela Mihaylova; Patrik Vuilleumier; Ulrike Rimmele
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Liking versus Complexity: Decomposing the Inverted U-curve.

Authors:  Yağmur Güçlütürk; Richard H A H Jacobs; Rob van Lier
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Tracking two pleasures.

Authors:  Aenne A Brielmann; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.