Literature DB >> 29228142

Beauty at a glance: The feeling of beauty and the amplitude of pleasure are independent of stimulus duration.

Aenne A Brielmann1, Lauren Vale1, Denis G Pelli2.   

Abstract

Over time, how does beauty develop and decay? Common sense suggests that beauty is intensely felt only after prolonged experience of the object. Here, we present one of various stimuli for a variable duration (1-30 s), measure the observers' pleasure over time, and, finally, ask whether they felt beauty. On each trial, participants (N = 21) either see an image that they had chosen as "movingly beautiful," see an image with prerated valence, or suck a candy. During the stimulus and a further 60 s, participants rate pleasure continuously using a custom touchscreen web app, EmotionTracker.com. After each trial, participants judge whether they felt beauty. Across all stimulus kinds, durations, and beauty responses, the dynamic pleasure rating has a stereotypical time course that is well fit by a one-parameter model with a brief exponential onset (roughly 2.5 s), a sustained plateau during stimulus presentation, and a long exponential decay (roughly 70 s). Across conditions, only the plateau amplitude varies. Beauty and pleasure amplitude are nearly independent of stimulus duration. The final beauty rating is positively correlated with pleasure amplitude (r = 0.60), and nearly independent of duration (r = 0.10). Beauty's independence from duration is unlike Bentham's 18th-century notion of value (utility), which he supposed to depend on the product of pleasure amplitude and duration. Participants report having felt pleasure as strongly after a mere 1 s stimulus as after longer durations, up to 30 s. Thus, we find that amplitude of pleasure is independent of stimulus duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29228142      PMCID: PMC6894407          DOI: 10.1167/17.14.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  27 in total

1.  Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence.

Authors:  I Aharon; N Etcoff; D Ariely; C F Chabris; E O'Connor; H C Breiter
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Wanting, liking, and preference construction.

Authors:  Xianchi Dai; C Miguel Brendl; Dan Ariely
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2010-06

3.  Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty.

Authors:  Thomas Jacobsen; Ricarda I Schubotz; Lea Höfel; D Yves V Cramon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Origins of a stereotype: categorization of facial attractiveness by 6-month-old infants.

Authors:  Jennifer L Ramsey; Judith H Langlois; Rebecca A Hoss; Adam J Rubenstein; Angela M Griffin
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2004-04

5.  Using an oculomotor signature as an indicator of aesthetic preference.

Authors:  Tim Holmes; Johannes M Zanker
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-07-05

6.  Visualizing the Impact of Art: An Update and Comparison of Current Psychological Models of Art Experience.

Authors:  Matthew Pelowski; Patrick S Markey; Jon O Lauring; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Aesthetic and incentive salience of cute infant faces: studies of observer sex, oral contraception and menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Reiner Sprengelmeyer; Jennifer Lewis; Amanda Hahn; David I Perrett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Everything's Relative? Relative Differences in Processing Fluency and the Effects on Liking.

Authors:  Michael Forster; Gernot Gerger; Helmut Leder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Your Brain on Art: Emergent Cortical Dynamics During Aesthetic Experiences.

Authors:  Kimberly L Kontson; Murad Megjhani; Justin A Brantley; Jesus G Cruz-Garza; Sho Nakagome; Dario Robleto; Michelle White; Eugene Civillico; Jose L Contreras-Vidal
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Art in time and space: context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time.

Authors:  David Brieber; Marcos Nadal; Helmut Leder; Raphael Rosenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Feeling moved by music: Investigating continuous ratings and acoustic correlates.

Authors:  Jonna K Vuoskoski; Janis H Zickfeld; Vinoo Alluri; Vishnu Moorthigari; Beate Seibt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  e-Nature Positive Emotions Photography Database (e-NatPOEM): affectively rated nature images promoting positive emotions.

Authors:  Daniela Dal Fabbro; Giulia Catissi; Gustavo Borba; Luciano Lima; Erika Hingst-Zaher; João Rosa; Elivane Victor; Letícia Bernardes; Tinely Souza; Eliseth Leão
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Intense Beauty Requires Intense Pleasure.

Authors:  Aenne A Brielmann; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-05

4.  Similarity of gaze patterns across physical and virtual versions of an installation artwork.

Authors:  Doga Gulhan; Szonya Durant; Johannes M Zanker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Does art reduce pain and stress? A registered report protocol of investigating autonomic and endocrine markers of music, visual art, and multimodal aesthetic experience.

Authors:  Anna Fekete; Rosa M Maidhof; Eva Specker; Urs M Nater; Helmut Leder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.