Literature DB >> 26593960

Impairments in precision, rather than spatial strategy, characterize performance on the virtual Morris Water Maze: A case study.

Branden S Kolarik1, Kiarash Shahlaie2, Abdul Hassan3, Alyssa A Borders4, Kyle C Kaufman3, Gene Gurkoff2, Andy P Yonelinas4, Arne D Ekstrom5.   

Abstract

Damage to the medial temporal lobes produces profound amnesia, greatly impairing the ability of patients to learn about new associations and events. While studies in rodents suggest a strong link between damage to the hippocampus and the ability to navigate using distal landmarks in a spatial environment, the connection between navigation and memory in humans remains less clear. Past studies on human navigation have provided mixed findings about whether patients with damage to the medial temporal lobes can successfully acquire and navigate new spatial environments, possibly due, in part, to issues related to patient demographics and characterization of medial temporal lobe damage. Here, we report findings from a young, high functioning patient who suffered severe medial temporal lobe damage. Although the patient is densely amnestic, her ability to acquire and utilize new, but coarse, spatial "maps" appears largely intact. Specifically, a novel computational analysis focused on the precision of her spatial search revealed a significant deficit in spatial precision rather than spatial search strategy. These findings argue that an intact hippocampus in humans is not necessary for representing multiple external landmarks during spatial navigation of new environments. We suggest instead that the human hippocampus may store and represent complex high-resolution bindings of features in the environment as part of a larger role in perception, memory, and navigation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allocentric cognitive map; Hippocampus; MTL lesion; Memory; Morris Water Maze; Spatial memory

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26593960      PMCID: PMC4698252          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  61 in total

1.  Remembering our past: functional neuroanatomy of recollection of recent and very remote personal events.

Authors:  Asaf Gilboa; Gordon Winocur; Cheryl L Grady; Stephanie J Hevenor; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Functional neuroanatomy of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory: a unified account based on multiple trace theory.

Authors:  Morris Moscovitch; R Shayna Rosenbaum; Asaf Gilboa; Donna Rose Addis; Robyn Westmacott; Cheryl Grady; Mary Pat McAndrews; Brian Levine; Sandra Black; Gordon Winocur; Lynn Nadel
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Memory formation and long-term retention in humans and animals: convergence towards a transformation account of hippocampal-neocortical interactions.

Authors:  Gordon Winocur; Morris Moscovitch; Bruno Bontempi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory.

Authors:  R D'Hooge; P P De Deyn
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2001-08

Review 6.  Are the dorsal and ventral hippocampus functionally distinct structures?

Authors:  Michael S Fanselow; Hong-Wei Dong
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Humans with hippocampus damage display severe spatial memory impairments in a virtual Morris water task.

Authors:  Robert S Astur; Laughlin B Taylor; Adam N Mamelak; Linda Philpott; Robert J Sutherland
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Age differences in the neural systems supporting human allocentric spatial navigation.

Authors:  Scott D Moffat; Wendy Elkins; Susan M Resnick
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2005-06-27       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 9.  The medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; Craig E L Stark; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Spatial deficits in a virtual water maze in amnesic participants with hippocampal damage.

Authors:  Naomi J Goodrich-Hunsaker; Sharon A Livingstone; Ronald W Skelton; Ramona O Hopkins
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.899

View more
  32 in total

1.  Visual working memory impairments for single items following medial temporal lobe damage.

Authors:  Robin I Goodrich; Trevor L Baer; Jörn A Quent; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Hippocampal CA1 gamma power predicts the precision of spatial memory judgments.

Authors:  Rebecca F Stevenson; Jie Zheng; Lilit Mnatsakanyan; Sumeet Vadera; Robert T Knight; Jack J Lin; Michael A Yassa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The medial temporal lobe supports sensing-based visual working memory.

Authors:  Robin I Goodrich; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Visual short-term memory for high resolution associations is impaired in patients with medial temporal lobe damage.

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Alyssa A Borders; Michael T Petzold; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 5.  Interacting networks of brain regions underlie human spatial navigation: a review and novel synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Arne D Ekstrom; Derek J Huffman; Michael Starrett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Reconstructing relational information.

Authors:  Kevin M Horecka; Michael R Dulas; Hillary Schwarb; Heather D Lucas; Melissa Duff; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  The hippocampus is particularly important for building associations across stimulus domains.

Authors:  Alyssa A Borders; Mariam Aly; Colleen M Parks; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  A virtual water maze revisited: Two-year changes in navigation performance and their neural correlates in healthy adults.

Authors:  Ana M Daugherty; Naftali Raz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Distinguishing the precision of spatial recollection from its success: Evidence from healthy aging and unilateral mesial temporal lobe resection.

Authors:  Aneesha S Nilakantan; Donna J Bridge; Stephen VanHaerents; Joel L Voss
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 10.  The cognitive map in humans: spatial navigation and beyond.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Eva Zita Patai; Joshua B Julian; Hugo J Spiers
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.