Literature DB >> 26589950

New-onset rectoanal intussusception may not result in symptomatic improvement after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse.

A Tsunoda1, T Takahashi2, T Ohta2, W Fujii2, H Kusanagi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess defecatory function in patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) for external rectal prolapse (ERP).
METHODS: Thirty-one patients who underwent evacuation proctography 6 months postoperatively were assessed. Preoperative proctography had been performed in 21 patients of these patients. Defecatory function was evaluated using the constipation scoring system (CSS) and fecal incontinence severity index (FISI).
RESULTS: The findings of postoperative proctography revealed no full-thickness ERP in any patient, although in 10 patients the ERP was replaced by rectoanal intussusception (RAI). Of the 31 patients, 30 presented with fecal incontinence preoperatively. Ten of 30 had new-onset RAI. Six months postoperatively, a reduction of at least 50 % in the FISI score of the patients with new-onset RAI tended to be significantly smaller than in the patients without RAI (6/10 vs. 18/20, p = 0.141). Seventeen patients presented with obstructed defecation preoperatively. Seven of them had new-onset RAI. Six months postoperatively, a reduction of at least 50 % in their CSS score in the patients with new-onset RAI was significantly smaller than in patients without RAI (0/7 vs. 8/10, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Evacuation proctography showed new-onset RAI in some patients with ERP who underwent LVR, which was associated with a lack of symptomatic improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evacuation proctography; External rectal prolapse; Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26589950     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-015-1395-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  27 in total

1.  Fecal incontinence: etiology, evaluation, and treatment.

Authors:  Dana M Hayden; Eric G Weiss
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-03

2.  Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications.

Authors:  P J Shorvon; S McHugh; N E Diamant; S Somers; G W Stevenson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Technical and functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy to the promontory for complete rectal prolapse. Prospective study in 54 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Thomas Auguste; Alain Dubreuil; Richard Bost; Bruno Bonaz; Jean-Luc Faucheron
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  2006-05

4.  Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectoanal intussusception: postoperative evaluation with proctography.

Authors:  Akira Tsunoda; Tomoyuki Ohta; Yoshiyuki Kiyasu; Hiroshi Kusanagi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  Anterior rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: Technical and functional results.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Faucheron; Bertrand Trilling; Edouard Girard; Pierre-Yves Sage; Sandrine Barbois; Fabian Reche
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse.

Authors:  A D'Hoore; R Cadoni; F Penninckx
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and symptomatic rectocele: an analysis of 245 consecutive patients.

Authors:  H A Formijne Jonkers; N Poierrié; W A Draaisma; I A M J Broeders; E C J Consten
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 9.  Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients.

Authors:  A Mellgren; S Bremmer; C Johansson; A Dolk; R Udén; S O Ahlbäck; B Holmström
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Defecography: a practical approach.

Authors:  Niccoló Faccioli; Alessio Comai; Paride Mainardi; Simone Perandini; Farah Moore; Roberto Pozzi-Mucelli
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 2.630

View more
  5 in total

1.  High take-off intussusception or prolapse may have a poor outcome after standard ventral mesh rectopexy-a tailored approach is required.

Authors:  P J Tozer; C J Vaizey; J Grainger; J H Warusavitarne
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  New-onset rectoanal intussusceptions after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a normal image?

Authors:  B Trilling; J-L Faucheron
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Jan J van Iersel; Tim J C Paulides; Paul M Verheijen; John W Lumley; Ivo A M J Broeders; Esther C J Consten
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Cost-analysis and quality of life after laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for posterior compartment prolapse: a randomized trial.

Authors:  J Mäkelä-Kaikkonen; T Rautio; A Ohinmaa; S Koivurova; P Ohtonen; H Sintonen; J Mäkelä
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Midterm functional outcome after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Akira Tsunoda; Tomoko Takahashi; Satoshi Matsuda; Naoki Oka; Hiroshi Kusanagi
Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg       Date:  2019-03-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.