Literature DB >> 2658883

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of bile duct calculi. An interim report of the Dornier U.S. Bile Duct Lithotripsy Prospective Study.

K I Bland1, R S Jones, J W Maher, P B Cotton, T C Pennell, J R Amerson, J L Munson, G Berci, G J Fuchs, L W Way.   

Abstract

A multi-institutional study to evaluate the efficacy, clinical application, and safety of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with the Dornier HM-3 or HM-4 lithotripter for bile duct calculi (BDC) was initiated in September, 1987. Symptomatic patients who entered into this prospective trial had BDC in the common bile duct and/or the intrahepatic, cystic or lobar ducts of the liver that were inaccessible or untreatable by papillotomy or percutaneous stone extraction. The study excluded gallbladder stones. Nasobiliary (54.4%) or transhepatic catheters (10.5%) and T-tube or cholecystostomy tubes (17.5%) or combinations (14.0%) permitted access for radiographic contrast to allow fluoroscopic monitoring of stone position and fragmentation. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, failure to localize the stone, disturbances of coagulation, pacemakers, or vascular aneurysms or large bones that lie in the focal axis of the shock waves. Eleven institutions treated 42 patients (23 male, 19 female) with BDC; age range was 25 to 95 years (mean +/- SD, 73.5 +/- 13.8) and ASA risk category was 1 to 4 (mean, 2.3 +/- 0.8). Fourteen patients (33.3%) had a single BDC; 28 had 2 to 8 stones (mean, 2.7 +/- 1.8) ranging in size from 6 mm to 30 mm (mean, 18.5 +/- 6.4). The majority (66.7%) of patients were postcholecystectomy. The 42 patients received 57 ESWL treatments consisting of 600 to 2400 shocks per treatment (mean, 1924 +/- 289) at 12 to 22 kV (mean, 18.5 +/- 1.9) administered over 20 to 125 minutes (mean, 52.9 +/- 20.8). General anesthesia was used in 32% of the treatments; the majority were treated with epidural or regional block (42.1%), local infiltration (28.1%), or intravenous sedation (38.6%). Fifteen patients (35.7%) required two ESWL treatments. Stone fragmentation occurred in 94.6% of evaluable patients and in 90.4% of ESWL treatments, respectively; however, BDC fragments remained in 59.5% of patients 24 hours after treatment (diameter less than or to 3 mm, 12%; 4 to 9 mm, 16%; greater than or equal to 10 mm, 68%). Some patients (50%) required adjunctive procedures to achieve stone removal that included endoscopic extraction (n = 10; 47.6%), biliary lavage (n = 8; 38.1%), endoscopic bile duct prosthesis (n = 1; 4.8%), and operation (n = 2; 9.5%). ESWL treatment complications during hospitalization were observed in 15 patients (35.7%) and were present in four (9.5%) at discharge. Complications included macrohematuria (5%), biliary pain (15%), biliary sepsis (5%), hemobilia (10%), ileus (2.5%), and adverse pulmonary changes (7.5%). One patient developed pancreatitis before ESWL at ERCP that resolved prior to discharge.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2658883      PMCID: PMC1494134          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198906000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  33 in total

1.  Endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy for the treatment of common bile duct stone. Experience with the improved double sheath basket catheter.

Authors:  T Higuchi; Y Kon
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Treatment of retained cystic duct stones using extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  C D Becker; J S Fache; R G Gibney; J L Stoller; H J Burhenne
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  G W Drach; S Dretler; W Fair; B Finlayson; J Gillenwater; D Griffith; J Lingeman; D Newman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the management of complex biliary tract stone disease.

Authors:  M C Taylor; J C Marshall; L A Fried; G P LeBrun; R W Norman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of gallstones without general anesthesia: first clinical experience.

Authors:  M Sackmann; W Weber; M Delius; J Holl; U Hagelauer; T Sauerbruch; W Brendel; G Paumgartner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Choledocholithiasis: treatment with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  C D Becker; J S Fache; R G Gibney; C H Scudamore; H J Burhenne
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Biological effects of shock waves: lung hemorrhage by shock waves in dogs--pressure dependence.

Authors:  M Delius; G Enders; G Heine; J Stark; K Remberger; W Brendel
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of intrahepatic stones during choledochoscopy.

Authors:  S Matsumoto; M Tanaka; H Yoshimoto; K Miyazaki; S Ikeda; F Nakayama
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Obstructive jaundice and cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis: treatment by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  C D Becker; A G Nagy; J S Fache; R G Gibney; H J Burhenne
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  In vitro cholesterol gallstone dissolution after fragmentation with shock waves.

Authors:  M Neubrand; T Sauerbruch; F Stellaard; G Paumgartner
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.216

View more
  13 in total

1.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of bile duct stones: a single institution experience.

Authors:  E Lindström; K Borch; E P Kullman; H G Tiselius; I Ihse
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Successful shock-wave lithotripsy of bile duct stones using ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  S J Gordon; D A Stampfl; I S Grimm; W Dahnert; B B Goldberg; G Taglienti
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Open common bile duct exploration--end of an epoch?

Authors:  S T O'Sullivan; D J Hehir; G C O'Sullivan; W O Kirwan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Gall bladder lithotripsy.

Authors:  G Matthews
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-10-28

5.  Role of biliary stenting in the management of bile duct stones in the elderly.

Authors:  H R Dalton; R W Chapman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  R L van der Hul; P W Plaisier; O T Terpstra; H A Bruining
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Efficacy of percutaneous treatment of biliary tract calculi using the holmium:YAG laser.

Authors:  J W Hazey; M McCreary; G Guy; W S Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Biliary lithotripsy with a new electromagnetic shock wave source. A 2-year clinical experience.

Authors:  T Wehrmann; A Hurst; B Lembcke; M Jung; W Caspary
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and endoscopy: combined therapy for problematic bile duct stones.

Authors:  C Harz; T O Henkel; K U Köhrmann; F Pimentel; P Alken; B C Manegold
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laser lithotripsy of difficult bile duct stones under direct visual control.

Authors:  H Neuhaus; W Hoffmann; C Zillinger; M Classen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.