Literature DB >> 26588353

A High Amount of Local Adipose Tissue Is Associated With High Cortical Porosity and Low Bone Material Strength in Older Women.

Daniel Sundh1,2, Robert Rudäng1,2, Michail Zoulakis1,2, Anna G Nilsson1,2, Anna Darelid1,2, Mattias Lorentzon1,2.   

Abstract

Obesity is associated with increased risk of fractures, especially at skeletal sites with a large proportion of cortical bone, such as the humerus and ankle. Obesity increases fracture risk independently of BMD, indicating that increased adipose tissue could have negative effects on bone quality. Microindentation assesses bone material strength index (BMSi) in vivo in humans. The aim of this study was to investigate if different depots of adipose tissue were associated with BMSi and cortical bone microstructure in a population based group of 202 women, 78.2 ± 1.1 (mean ± SD) years old. Bone parameters and subcutaneous (s.c.) fat were measured at the tibia with an XtremeCT device. BMSi was assessed using the OsteoProbe device, and based on at least 11 valid reference point indentations at the mid-tibia. Body composition was measured with dual X-ray absorptiometry. BMSi was inversely correlated to body mass index (BMI) (r = -0.17, p = 0.01), whole body fat mass (r = -0.16,p = 0.02), and, in particular, to tibia s.c. fat (r = -0.33, p < 0.001). Tibia s.c. fat was also correlated to cortical porosity (Ct.Po; r = 0.19, p = 0.01) and cortical volumetric BMD (Ct.vBMD; r = -0.23, p = 0.001). Using linear regression analyses, tibia s.c. fat was found to be independent of covariates (age, height, log weight, bisphosphonates or glucocorticoid use, smoking, calcium intake, walking speed, and BMSi operator) and associated with BMSi (β = -0.34,p < 0.001), Ct.Po (β = 0.18, p = 0.01), and Ct.vBMD (β = -0.32, p < 0.001). BMSi was independent of covariates associated with cortical porosity (β = -0.14, p = 0.04) and cortical volumetric BMD (β = 0.21, p = 0.02) at the distal tibia, but these bone parameters could only explain 3.3% and 5.1% of the variation in BMSi, respectively. In conclusion, fat mass was independently and inversely associated with BMSi and Ct.vBMD, but positively associated with Ct.Po, indicating a possible adverse effect of adipose tissue on bone quality and bone microstructure. Local s.c. fat in tibia was most strongly associated with these bone traits, suggesting a local or paracrine, rather than systemic, negative effect of fat on bone.
© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADIPOSE TISSUE; BONE MATERIAL STRENGTH; CORTICAL POROSITY; OSTEOPOROSIS; WOMEN

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26588353     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of the diagnostic performance of CT Hounsfield unit histogram analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in predicting osteoporosis of the femur.

Authors:  Hyun Kyung Lim; Hong Il Ha; Sun-Young Park; Kwanseop Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: aetiology, epidemiology and treatment strategies.

Authors:  John A Batsis; Dennis T Villareal
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  BMI, Waist Circumference, and Risk of Incident Vertebral Fracture in Women.

Authors:  Julie M Paik; Harold N Rosen; Jeffrey N Katz; Bernard A Rosner; Eric B Rimm; Catherine M Gordon; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 5.002

4.  3D UTE bicomponent imaging of cortical bone using a soft-hard composite pulse for excitation.

Authors:  Liang Li; Yanjun Chen; Zhao Wei; Zhenyu Cai; Saeed Jerban; Yunfei Zha; Ya-Jun Ma
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Advanced Glycation Endproducts and Bone Material Strength in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Jessica R Furst; Leonardo C Bandeira; Wen-Wei Fan; Sanchita Agarwal; Kyle K Nishiyama; Donald J McMahon; Elzbieta Dworakowski; Hongfeng Jiang; Shonni J Silverberg; Mishaela R Rubin
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Correlations of cortical bone microstructural and mechanical properties with water proton fractions obtained from ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI tricomponent T2* model.

Authors:  Saeed Jerban; Xing Lu; Erik W Dorthe; Salem Alenezi; Yajun Ma; Lena Kakos; Hyungseok Jang; Robert L Sah; Eric Y Chang; Darryl D'Lima; Jiang Du
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Differences in sensitivity to microstructure between cyclic- and impact-based microindentation of human cortical bone.

Authors:  Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mathilde Granke; Mary Kate Manhard; Mark D Does; Daniel S Perrien; Donald H Lee; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Transwomen and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study in Brazilian population.

Authors:  Kadija Rahal Chrisostomo; Thelma L Skare; Henrique Rahal Chrisostomo; Edna J Litenski Barbosa; Renato Nisihara
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  BMI and BMD: The Potential Interplay between Obesity and Bone Fragility.

Authors:  Andrea Palermo; Dario Tuccinardi; Giuseppe Defeudis; Mikiko Watanabe; Luca D'Onofrio; Angelo Lauria Pantano; Nicola Napoli; Paolo Pozzilli; Silvia Manfrini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Association between Visceral and Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue and Bone Quality in Sedentary and Physically Active Ovariectomized Wistar Rats.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Andrea Bezerra; Ana Coelho; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.