Literature DB >> 26587886

Timing of HPV vaccine intervals among United States teens with consideration to the current ACIP schedule and the WHO 2-dose schedule.

Emily A Cloessner1, Shannon Stokley2, David Yankey2, Lauri E Markowitz2.   

Abstract

The current recommendation for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in the United States is for 3 doses to be administered over a 6 month period. In April 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended adoption of a 2-dose schedule, with doses spaced a minimum of 6 months apart, for teens who begin the series before age 15. We analyzed data from the 2013 National Immunization Survey-Teen to examine the timing of second and third dose receipt among US adolescents. All analyses were restricted to adolescents age 13-17 y who had adequate provider data. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test measured differences in time to receive vaccine doses among demographic and socioeconomic groups. Logistic regression identified socioeconomic characteristics associated with receiving the second dose of HPV vaccine at least 6 months after the first dose. The median time for teens to receive the second dose of HPV vaccine was 2.6 months after the first dose, and the median time to receive the third dose was 4.9 months after the second dose. Minority teens and teens living below the poverty level took significantly longer to receive doses. Among teens that initiated the HPV vaccine series before age 15 y, 28.6% received the second dose at least 6 months after the first dose. If these teens, who met the WHO criteria for up-to-date HPV vaccination, were classified as having completed the vaccination series, overall coverage in the US would increase 3.9 percentage points, with African American and Hispanic teens having the greatest increases in coverage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPV; adolescent vaccination; vaccination schedules

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26587886      PMCID: PMC4964644          DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1110659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


  19 in total

1.  Parent-reported reasons for nonreceipt of recommended adolescent vaccinations, national immunization survey: teen, 2009.

Authors:  Christina Dorell; David Yankey; Sheryl Strasser
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 1.168

2.  National human papillomavirus vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13-17 years-National Immunization Survey--teen, United States, 2011.

Authors:  C Robinette Curtis; Christina Dorell; David Yankey; Jenny Jeyarajah; Harrell Chesson; Mona Saraiya; Rebecca Gold; Eileen F Dunne; Shannon Stokley
Journal:  MMWR Suppl       Date:  2014-09-12

3.  Meeting of the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on immunization, April 2014 –- conclusions and recommendations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Wkly Epidemiol Rec       Date:  2014-05-23

4.  Overcoming barriers to HPV vaccination: non-inferiority of antibody response to human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine in adolescents vaccinated with a two-dose vs. a three-dose schedule at 21 months.

Authors:  Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Margaret Stanley; Nubia Muñoz; Leticia Torres; Aurelio Cruz-Valdez; Jorge Salmerón; Rosalba Rojas; Rolando Herrero; Mauricio Hernández-Ávila
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Dose-Related Differences in Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Against Genital Warts: A Nationwide Study of 550,000 Young Girls.

Authors:  Maria Blomberg; Christian Dehlendorff; Carsten Sand; Susanne K Kjaer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Provider recommendation mediates the relationship between parental human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine awareness and HPV vaccine initiation and completion among 13- to 17-year-old U.S. adolescent children.

Authors:  Mahbubur Rahman; Tabassum H Laz; Christine J McGrath; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 1.168

7.  Comparing the cost-effectiveness of two- and three-dose schedules of human papillomavirus vaccination: a transmission-dynamic modelling study.

Authors:  Jean-François Laprise; Mélanie Drolet; Marie-Claude Boily; Mark Jit; Chantal Sauvageau; Eduardo L Franco; Philippe Lemieux-Mellouki; Talía Malagón; Marc Brisson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Two-dose strategies for human papillomavirus vaccination: how well do they need to protect?

Authors:  Mark Jit; Yoon Hong Choi; Jean-François Laprise; Marie-Claude Boily; Mélanie Drolet; Marc Brisson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  An extension of the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test for complex sample survey data.

Authors:  Sundar Natarajan; Stuart R Lipsitz; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Debajyoti Sinha; Joseph G Ibrahim; Jennifer Haas; Walid Gellad
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.864

10.  National, Regional, State, and Selected Local Area Vaccination Coverage Among Adolescents Aged 13-17 Years--United States, 2014.

Authors:  Sarah Reagan-Steiner; David Yankey; Jenny Jeyarajah; Laurie D Elam-Evans; James A Singleton; C Robinette Curtis; Jessica MacNeil; Lauri E Markowitz; Shannon Stokley
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  2 in total

1.  Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage using two-dose or three-dose schedule criteria.

Authors:  Xia Lin; Loren Rodgers; Liping Zhu; Shannon Stokley; Elissa Meites; Lauri E Markowitz
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Missed Opportunities for Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Initiation in an Insured Adolescent Female Population.

Authors:  Claudia M Espinosa; Gary S Marshall; Charles R Woods; Qianli Ma; Derek Ems; Irene Nsiah; Laura E Happe; Michael J Smith
Journal:  J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.164

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.