Literature DB >> 26587552

Matching methods evaluation framework for stereoscopic breast x-ray images.

Johanna Rousson1, Mathieu Naudin1, Cédric Marchessoux1.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3-D) imaging has been intensively studied in the past few decades. Depth information is an important added value of 3-D systems over two-dimensional systems. Special focuses were devoted to the development of stereo matching methods for the generation of disparity maps (i.e., depth information within a 3-D scene). Dedicated frameworks were designed to evaluate and rank the performance of different stereo matching methods but never considering x-ray medical images. Yet, 3-D x-ray acquisition systems and 3-D medical displays have already been introduced into the diagnostic market. To access the depth information within x-ray stereoscopic images, computing accurate disparity maps is essential. We aimed at developing a framework dedicated to x-ray stereoscopic breast images used to evaluate and rank several stereo matching methods. A multiresolution pyramid optimization approach was integrated to the framework to increase the accuracy and the efficiency of the stereo matching techniques. Finally, a metric was designed to score the results of the stereo matching compared with the ground truth. Eight methods were evaluated and four of them [locally scaled sum of absolute differences (LSAD), zero mean sum of absolute differences, zero mean sum of squared differences, and locally scaled mean sum of squared differences] appeared to perform equally good with an average error score of 0.04 (0 is the perfect matching). LSAD was selected for generating the disparity maps.

Keywords:  computer vision; displays; image quality; medical imaging; stereoscopy; three dimensions

Year:  2015        PMID: 26587552      PMCID: PMC4650965          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.1.011007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  8 in total

1.  Effects of quantum noise and binocular summation on dose requirements in stereoradiography.

Authors:  Andrew D A Maidment; Predrag R Bakic; Michael Albert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Mammogram synthesis using a three-dimensional simulation. III. Modeling and evaluation of the breast ductal network.

Authors:  Predrag R Bakic; Michael Albert; Dragana Brzakovic; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Evaluation of stereo matching costs on images with radiometric differences.

Authors:  Heiko Hirschmüller; Daniel Scharstein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Authors:  L T Niklason; B T Christian; L E Niklason; D B Kopans; D E Castleberry; B H Opsahl-Ong; C E Landberg; P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; R Moore; D Albagli; M C DeJule; P F Fitzgerald; D F Fobare; B W Giambattista; R F Kwasnick; J Liu; S J Lubowski; G E Possin; J F Richotte; C Y Wei; R F Wirth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.

Authors:  Afsaneh Jalalian; Syamsiah B T Mashohor; Hajjah Rozi Mahmud; M Iqbal B Saripan; Abdul Rahman B Ramli; Babak Karasfi
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 1.605

6.  Stereoscopic digital mammography: improved specificity and reduced rate of recall in a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Carl J D'Orsi; David J Getty; Ronald M Pickett; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Mary S Newell; Kathleen R Gundry; Sandra R Bates; Robert M Nishikawa; Edward A Sickles; Andrew Karellas; Ellen M D'Orsi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Detection of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Ryusuke Murakami; Shinichiro Kumita; Hitomi Tani; Tamiko Yoshida; Kenichi Sugizaki; Tomoyuki Kuwako; Tomonari Kiriyama; Kenta Hakozaki; Emi Okazaki; Keiko Yanagihara; Shinya Iida; Shunsuke Haga; Shinichi Tsuchiya
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Computer aided detection (CAD): an overview.

Authors:  Ronald A Castellino
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 3.909

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.