Literature DB >> 11495834

Specificity of task constraints and effects of visual demonstrations and verbal instructions in directing learners' search during skill acquisition.

S A Al-Abood1, K F Davids, S J Bennett.   

Abstract

In the present study, the efficacy of visual demonstrations and verbal instructions as instructional constraints on the acquisition of movement coordination was investigated. Fifteen participants performed an aiming task on 100 acquisition and 20 retention trials, under 1 of 3 conditions: a modeling group (MG), a verbally directed group (VDG), and a control group (CG). The MG observed a model intermittently throughout acquisition, whereas the VDG was verbally instructed to use the model's movement pattern. Participants in the CG received neither form of instruction. Kinematic analysis revealed that compared with verbal instructions or no instructions, visual demonstrations significantly improved participants' approximation of the model's coordination pattern. No differences were found in movement outcomes. Coordination data supported the visual perception perspective on observational learning, whereas outcome data suggested that the modeling effect is mainly a function of task constraints, that is, the novelty of a movement pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11495834     DOI: 10.1080/00222890109601915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  15 in total

1.  Learning through observation: a combination of expert and novice models favors learning.

Authors:  Hassan Rohbanfard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Observation and physical practice: different practice contexts lead to similar outcomes for the acquisition of kinematic information.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Inchon Park
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-11-19

3.  Observation learning of a motor task: who and when?

Authors:  Mathieu Andrieux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Specificity in practice benefits learning in novice models and variability in demonstration benefits observational practice.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Noah J Dean
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-09-02

5.  Mixed observation favors motor learning through better estimation of the model's performance.

Authors:  Mathieu Andrieux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Adoption of a toothbrushing technique: a controlled, randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  N Schlueter; J Klimek; G Saleschke; C Ganss
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  The effect of different imitation models on theaccuracy and speed of imitation of movement.

Authors:  Hitomi Nishizawa; Teiji Kimura; Ah-Cheng Goh
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-11-30

8.  How can ten fingers shape a pot? Evidence for equivalent function in culturally distinct motor skills.

Authors:  Enora Gandon; Reinoud J Bootsma; John A Endler; Leore Grosman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Observational Learning: Tell Beginners What They Are about to Watch and They Will Learn Better.

Authors:  Mathieu Andrieux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-29

10.  Effects of proprioception training with exercise imagery on balance ability of stroke patients.

Authors:  Hyungjin Lee; Heesoo Kim; Myunghwan Ahn; Youngyoul You
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-01-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.